Literature DB >> 29749573

Tone-Evoked Acoustic Change Complex (ACC) Recorded in a Sedated Animal Model.

Alessandro Presacco1,2, John C Middlebrooks3,4,5,6,7.   

Abstract

The acoustic change complex (ACC) is a scalp-recorded cortical evoked potential complex generated in response to changes (e.g., frequency, amplitude) in an auditory stimulus. The ACC has been well studied in humans, but to our knowledge, no animal model has been evaluated. In particular, it was not known whether the ACC could be recorded under the conditions of sedation that likely would be necessary for recordings from animals. For that reason, we tested the feasibility of recording ACC from sedated cats in response to changes of frequency and amplitude of pure-tone stimuli. Cats were sedated with ketamine and acepromazine, and subdermal needle electrodes were used to record electroencephalographic (EEG) activity. Tones were presented from a small loudspeaker located near the right ear. Continuous tones alternated at 500-ms intervals between two frequencies or two levels. Neurometric functions were created by recording neural response amplitudes while systematically varying the magnitude of steps in frequency centered in octave frequency around 2, 4, 8, and 16 kHz, all at 75 dB SPL, or in decibel level around 75 dB SPL tested at 4 and 8 kHz. The ACC could be recorded readily under this ketamine/azepromazine sedation. In contrast, ACC could not be recorded reliably under any level of isoflurane anesthesia that was tested. The minimum frequency (expressed as Weber fractions (df/f)) or level steps (expressed in dB) needed to elicit ACC fell in the range of previous thresholds reported in animal psychophysical tests of discrimination. The success in recording ACC in sedated animals suggests that the ACC will be a useful tool for evaluation of other aspects of auditory acuity in normal hearing and, presumably, in electrical cochlear stimulation, especially for novel stimulation modes that are not yet feasible in humans.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory-evoked potential; cat; frequency acuity; frequency change; level acuity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29749573      PMCID: PMC6081888          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-018-0673-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  42 in total

1.  Right hemispheric laterality of human 40 Hz auditory steady-state responses.

Authors:  B Ross; A T Herdman; C Pantev
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2005-03-16       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Slow evoked cortical responses to linear frequency ramps of a continuous pure tone.

Authors:  S D Arlinger; L B Jerlvall; T Ahrén; E C Holmgren
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  1976-12

3.  Stimulus presentation strategies for eliciting the acoustic change complex: increasing efficiency.

Authors:  Brett A Martin; Arthur Boothroyd; Dassan Ali; Tiffany Leach-Berth
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Results of psychoacoustic and cortical evoked potential experiments using frequency and amplitude modulated stimuli.

Authors:  S D Arlinger; L B Jerlvall
Journal:  Scand Audiol Suppl       Date:  1979

5.  Frequency discrimination in noise: comparison of cat performances with auditory-nerve models.

Authors:  R D Hienz; M B Sachs; C M Aleszczyk
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Behavioral auditory function after transection of crossed olivo-cochlear bundle in the cat. IV. Study on pure-tone frequency discrimination.

Authors:  M Igarashi; J L Cranford; Y Nakai; B R Alford
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1979 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.494

7.  Auditory discrimination: the relationship between psychophysical and electrophysiological measures.

Authors:  Shuman He; John H Grose; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.117

8.  Selective electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve activates a pathway specialized for high temporal acuity.

Authors:  John C Middlebrooks; Russell L Snyder
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Contributions from the auditory nerve to the brain-stem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs): results of intracranial recording in man.

Authors:  A R Møller; P J Jannetta; L N Sekhar
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1988 May-Jun

10.  Propofol infusion and auditory evoked potentials.

Authors:  G Savoia; C Esposito; F Belfiore; B Amantea; R Cuocolo
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 6.955

View more
  5 in total

1.  Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials in Response to Frequency Changes with Varied Magnitude, Rate, and Direction.

Authors:  Bernard M D Vonck; Marc J W Lammers; Marjolijn van der Waals; Gijsbert A van Zanten; Huib Versnel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-06-05

2.  Frequency following responses and rate change complexes in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Robin Gransier; Franҫois Guérit; Robert P Carlyon; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 3.  Cochlear Implant Research and Development in the Twenty-first Century: A Critical Update.

Authors:  Robert P Carlyon; Tobias Goehring
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-08-25

4.  Temporal Pitch Sensitivity in an Animal Model: Psychophysics and Scalp Recordings : Temporal Pitch Sensitivity in Cat.

Authors:  Matthew L Richardson; François Guérit; Robin Gransier; Jan Wouters; Robert P Carlyon; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-06-06

5.  Tonotopic Selectivity in Cats and Humans: Electrophysiology and Psychophysics.

Authors:  Francois Guérit; John C Middlebrooks; Matthew L Richardson; Akshat Arneja; Andrew J Harland; Robin Gransier; Jan Wouters; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-06-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.