Literature DB >> 18633726

Health-related quality of life after hand-assisted laparoscopic and open radical nephrectomies of renal cell carcinoma.

Jianping Jiang1, Xiangyi Zheng, Jie Qin, Mingzhi Zheng, Qiqi Mao, Zhigen Zhang, Songliang Cai, Liping Xie.   

Abstract

AIM: To compare the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in contemporaneous groups of patients undergoing hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (HALRN) or open radical nephrectomy (ORN) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The clinical data of 20 cases receiving hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (the HALRN group) and 51 cases receiving open radical nephrectomy (the ORN group) were analyzed retrospectively and health questionnaires were mailed to these patients at 1 year postoperatively. The two groups were compared in terms of general surgery-related information, tumor characteristics, days to return to work or routine daily activities, and health-related quality-of-life scales.
RESULTS: Patients in the HALRN group had significantly less mean incision length (6.25 versus 17.8 cm), faster return to work or routine daily activities (5.3 versus 8.6 weeks), and earlier out-of-bed activity (4.76 versus 6.59 days) compared with those in the ORN group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in HRQOL scales at 1 year between the both groups (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The results showed that hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery is a minimally invasive surgical technique for RCC offering earlier recovery and similar long-term HRQOL compared with open surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18633726     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-008-9429-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  16 in total

1.  Live donor nephrectomy and return to work: does the operative technique matter?

Authors:  M Y Lind; Y S Liem; W A Bemelman; P M M Dooper; W C J Hop; W Weimar; J N M Ijzermans
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-02-17       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Hand assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: comparison with open radical nephrectomy.

Authors:  Sang Eun Lee; Ja Hyeon Ku; Cheol Kwak; Hyeon Hoe Kim; Sung Hyun Paick
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Chinese SF-36 Health Survey: translation, cultural adaptation, validation, and normalisation.

Authors:  L Li; H M Wang; Y Shen
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  A pilot study of the assessment of the quality of life, functional results, and complications in patients with an ileal neobladder for invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Masahiko Harano; Masatoshi Eto; Motonobu Nakamura; Yoshihiro Hasegawa; Motonori Kano; Akito Yamaguchi; Seiji Naito
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.369

5.  Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report.

Authors:  R V Clayman; L R Kavoussi; N J Soper; S M Dierks; S Meretyk; M D Darcy; F D Roemer; E D Pingleton; P G Thomson; S R Long
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Health-related quality of life after retroperitoneoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy.

Authors:  A Patel; L Wilson; C Blick; R Gurajala; A Rané
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Quality of life and psychological adaptation after surgical treatment for localized renal cell carcinoma: impact of the amount of remaining renal tissue.

Authors:  P E Clark; L R Schover; R G Uzzo; K S Hafez; L A Rybicki; A C Novick
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Hand-assisted laparoscopic vs the open (flank incision) approach to radical nephrectomy.

Authors:  E Busby; S Das; H S G Rao Tunuguntla; C P Evans
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy.

Authors:  M Tanaka; N Tokuda; S Naito
Journal:  Aktuelle Urol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 0.658

10.  Quality of life after surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma: comparison between radical nephrectomy and nephron-sparing surgery.

Authors:  Vassilis Poulakis; Ulrich Witzsch; Rachelle de Vries; Matthias Moeckel; Eduard Becht
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  6 in total

1.  Camera and trocar placement for robot-assisted radical and partial nephrectomy: which configuration provides optimal visualization and instrument mobility?

Authors:  Jose M Cabello; Sam B Bhayani; Robert S Figenshau; Brian M Benway
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2009-08-04

2.  Comprehensive assessment of quality of life and psychosocial adjustment in patients with renal tumors undergoing open, laparoscopic and nephron sparing surgery.

Authors:  Patricia A Parker; Richard Swartz; Bryan Fellman; Diana Urbauer; Yisheng Li; Louis L Pisters; Charles J Rosser; Christopher G Wood; Surena F Matin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  Pushing the Envelope: Laparoscopic Nephrectomy as Outpatient Surgery.

Authors:  Nessn H Azawi; Tom Christensen; Claus Dahl; Lars Lund
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-01-27       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Cost-utility analysis of radical nephrectomy versus partial nephrectomy in the management of small renal masses: Adjusting for the burden of ensuing chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Zachary Klinghoffer; Jean-Eric Tarride; Giacomo Novara; Vincenzo Ficarra; Anil Kapoor; Bobby Shayegan; Luis H Braga
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for clinical T1 renal masses: no impact of surgical approach on perioperative complications and long-term postoperative quality of life.

Authors:  Andreas Becker; Lea Pradel; Luis Kluth; Marianne Schmid; Christian Eichelberg; Sascha Ahyai; Quoc Trinh; Daniel Seiler; Roland Dahlem; Jens Hansen; Michael Rink; Mario Zacharias; Anja Mehnert; Corinna Bergelt; Margit Fisch; Felix K H Chun
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-05-31       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  Interventions to enhance return-to-work for cancer patients.

Authors:  Angela G E M de Boer; Tyna K Taskila; Sietske J Tamminga; Michael Feuerstein; Monique H W Frings-Dresen; Jos H Verbeek
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-09-25
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.