Literature DB >> 12913691

Hand assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: comparison with open radical nephrectomy.

Sang Eun Lee1, Ja Hyeon Ku, Cheol Kwak, Hyeon Hoe Kim, Sung Hyun Paick.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We compared the results of hand assisted laparoscopic and conventional open radical nephrectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical data on 54 hand assisted and 50 open radical nephrectomies performed at our hospital from September 1999 to October 2002 were reviewed.
RESULTS: Mean operative time in the laparoscopic and open groups was similar (194.9 and 180.7 minutes, respectively, p = 0.087). However, estimated mean blood loss (182.8 vs 262.8 ml, p <0.001), mean days to oral intake (2.6 vs 3.7 days, p <0.001) mean duration of an indwelling drain (2.6 vs 3.2 days, p <0.001) and mean hospital stay (6.8 vs 8.9 days, p <0.001) were significantly less in the laparoscopic group. In the laparoscopic group no conversions or re-explorations were required and no major complications occurred.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that hand assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy represents an effective, minimally invasive treatment option in patients with suspected renal cell carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12913691     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000080537.28752.aa

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  5 in total

Review 1.  Current Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Critical Evaluation.

Authors:  Aristotle Bamias; Bernard Escudier; Cora N Sternberg; Flora Zagouri; Athanasios Dellis; Bob Djavan; Kimon Tzannis; Loukas Kontovinis; Konstantinos Stravodimos; Athanasios Papatsoris; Dionysios Mitropoulos; Charalampos Deliveliotis; Meletios-Athanasios Dimopoulos; Constantine A Constantinides
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-06-07

2.  Health-related quality of life after hand-assisted laparoscopic and open radical nephrectomies of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jianping Jiang; Xiangyi Zheng; Jie Qin; Mingzhi Zheng; Qiqi Mao; Zhigen Zhang; Songliang Cai; Liping Xie
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Prospective evaluation of complications in laparoscopic urology at a mid-volume institution using standardized criteria: Experience of 1023 cases including learning curve in 9 years.

Authors:  Oner Sanli; Tzevat Tefik; Selcuk Erdem; Mazhar Ortac; Emre Salabas; Serkan Karakus; Baris Yucel; Abubekir Boyuk; Tayfun Oktar; Faruk Ozcan; Necdet Aras; Murat Tunc; Ismet Nane
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.407

4.  Laparoscopic Versus Open Radical Nephrectomy for Renal Cell Carcinoma: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Gang Liu; Yulei Ma; Shouhua Wang; Xiancheng Han; Dianjun Gao
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 4.243

Review 5.  Surgical complications of laparoscopic urological surgery.

Authors:  Michael S Lasser; Reza Ghavamian
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2012-01-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.