Literature DB >> 27638371

Camera and trocar placement for robot-assisted radical and partial nephrectomy: which configuration provides optimal visualization and instrument mobility?

Jose M Cabello1, Sam B Bhayani1, Robert S Figenshau1, Brian M Benway2.   

Abstract

Proper camera and trocar placement is critical to the success of minimally invasive procedures. For robot-assisted renal surgery, two basic trocar configurations have been described. The medial approach, using a 30° downward-angled lens mimics a traditional transperitoneal laparoscopic configuration. An alternative configuration, using a 0° or 30° upward-angled lens approach locates the camera laterally, evoking a position sense similar to a retroperitoneal approach. Our objective is to compare the differences between these two standard approaches for robot-assisted renal surgery. After performing a review and analysis of available literature, our group tested both the medial and lateral camera approaches during robotic renal surgery performed in human patients. The medial approach provides a wide field of view, because of the relatively greater distance to the target structures and a horizon line closer to the patient's midline. The lateral configuration offers significantly different visualization. The relative proximity to the target structures and a higher horizon line results in a comparatively restricted field of vision. Instrument mobility is comparable between the two approaches. Meta-analysis of the literature reveals that both approaches provide comparable overall operative times for both radical and partial nephrectomy, though there is a trend towards shorter overall operative times for partial nephrectomy performed through a medial approach. The medial trocar configuration provides a familiar working environment for both surgeon and assistant; the wide-angle view enables enhanced visualization of surrounding structures and tracking of the instruments inserted by the assistant. The lateral approach offers the potential advantage of a closer view of the kidney, but does so at the expense of a significantly restricted field of view. In our experience, a medial trocar configuration offers significant advantages over the lateral trocar configuration, and is, therefore, the standard approach at our high-volume center.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Camera configuration; RAPN; Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy; Robot-assisted radical nephrectomy; Robot-assisted renal surgery, renal cell carcinoma; Technique; Trocar placement

Year:  2009        PMID: 27638371     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-009-0152-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  31 in total

1.  Robot assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: initial experience.

Authors:  Robert P Caruso; Courtney K Phillips; Eric Kau; Samir S Taneja; Michael D Stifelman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: the NYU technique.

Authors:  Courtney K Phillips; Samir S Taneja; Michael D Stifelman
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 3.  Robotic pyeloplasty: a critical appraisal.

Authors:  K Badwan; S Bhayani
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.547

4.  Clinical experience with laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Masao Tsujihata; Norio Nonomura; Chikahiro Momohara; Kazuo Nishimura; Akira Tsujimura; Akihiko Okuyama
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy: a 9-year experience.

Authors:  M D Dunn; A J Portis; A L Shalhav; A M Elbahnasy; C Heidorn; E M McDougall; R V Clayman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: technique and initial clinical experience with DaVinci robotic system.

Authors:  Matthew T Gettman; Michael L Blute; George K Chow; Richard Neururer; Georg Bartsch; Reinhard Peschel
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  National utilization trends of partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a case of underutilization?

Authors:  Brent K Hollenbeck; David A Taub; David C Miller; Rodney L Dunn; John T Wei
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Feasibility of robotic radical nephrectomy--initial results of single-institution pilot study.

Authors:  Douglas W Klingler; George P Hemstreet; K C Balaji
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Robotic partial nephrectomy with sliding-clip renorrhaphy: technique and outcomes.

Authors:  Brian M Benway; Agnes J Wang; Jose M Cabello; Sam B Bhayani
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Robotic assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for suspected renal cell carcinoma: retrospective review of surgical outcomes of 35 cases.

Authors:  Sam B Bhayani; Nitin Das
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.