Literature DB >> 18627547

Upstream oversight assessment for agrifood nanotechnology: a case studies approach.

Jennifer Kuzma1, James Romanchek, Adam Kokotovich.   

Abstract

Although nanotechnology is broadly receiving attention in public and academic circles, oversight issues associated with applications for agriculture and food remain largely unexplored. Agrifood nanotechnology is at a critical stage in which informed analysis can help shape funding priorities, risk assessment, and oversight activities. This analysis is designed to help society and policymakers anticipate and prepare for challenges posed by complicated, convergent applications of agrifood nanotechnology. The goal is to identify data, risk assessment, regulatory policy, and engagement needs for overseeing these products so they can be addressed prior to market entry. Our approach, termed upstream oversight assessment (UOA), has potential as a key element of anticipatory governance. It relies on distinct case studies of proposed applications of agrifood nanotechnology to highlight areas that need study and attention. As a tool for preparation, UOA anticipates the types and features of emerging applications; their endpoints of use in society; the extent to which users, workers, ecosystems, or consumers will be exposed; the nature of the material and its safety; whether and where the technologies might fit into current regulatory system(s); the strengths and weaknesses of the system(s) in light of these novel applications; and the possible social concerns related to oversight for them.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18627547     DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01071.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  5 in total

1.  The communication challenges presented by nanofoods.

Authors:  Timothy V Duncan
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2011-10-30       Impact factor: 39.213

2.  Corporate social responsibility for nanotechnology oversight.

Authors:  Jennifer Kuzma; Aliya Kuzhabekova
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2011-11

3.  Renegotiating GM crop regulation. Targeted gene-modification technology raises new issues for the oversight of genetically modified crops.

Authors:  Jennifer Kuzma; Adam Kokotovich
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 8.807

4.  Nanotechnology in meat processing and packaging: potential applications - a review.

Authors:  Karna Ramachandraiah; Sung Gu Han; Koo Bok Chin
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.509

5.  Societal Risk Evaluation Scheme (SRES): Scenario-Based Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Synthetic Biology Applications.

Authors:  Christopher L Cummings; Jennifer Kuzma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.