Literature DB >> 21626458

Corporate social responsibility for nanotechnology oversight.

Jennifer Kuzma1, Aliya Kuzhabekova.   

Abstract

Growing public concern and uncertainties surrounding emerging technologies suggest the need for socially-responsible behavior of companies in the development and implementation of oversight systems for them. In this paper, we argue that corporate social responsibility (CSR) is an important aspect of nanotechnology oversight given the role of trust in shaping public attitudes about nanotechnology and the lack of data about the health and environmental risks of nanoproducts. We argue that CSR is strengthened by the adoption of stakeholder-driven models and attention to moral principles in policies and programs. In this context, we examine drivers of CSR, contextual and leadership factors that influence CSR, and strategies for CSR. To illustrate these concepts, we discuss existing cases of CSR-like behavior in nanotechnology companies, and then provide examples of how companies producing nanomedicines can exhibit morally-driven CSR behavior.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21626458     DOI: 10.1007/s11019-011-9330-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Health Care Philos        ISSN: 1386-7423


  14 in total

1.  The influence of trust and perceptions of risks and benefits on the acceptance of gene technology.

Authors:  M Siegrist
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  The path to corporate responsibility.

Authors:  Simon Zadek
Journal:  Harv Bus Rev       Date:  2004-12

3.  Development of a preliminary framework for informing the risk analysis and risk management of nanoparticles.

Authors:  Kara Morgan
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.000

4.  Nanomedicine-emerging or re-emerging ethical issues? A discussion of four ethical themes.

Authors:  Christian Lenk; Nikola Biller-Andorno
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2006-08-30

5.  Upstream oversight assessment for agrifood nanotechnology: a case studies approach.

Authors:  Jennifer Kuzma; James Romanchek; Adam Kokotovich
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2008-07-04       Impact factor: 4.000

6.  An integrated approach to oversight assessment for emerging technologies.

Authors:  Jennifer Kuzma; Jordan Paradise; Gurumurthy Ramachandran; Jee-Ae Kim; Adam Kokotovich; Susan M Wolf
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 4.000

7.  Anticipating the perceived risk of nanotechnologies.

Authors:  Terre Satterfield; Milind Kandlikar; Christian E H Beaudrie; Joseph Conti; Barbara Herr Harthorn
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 39.213

8.  Review of the OSHA framework for oversight of occupational environments.

Authors:  Jae-Young Choi; Gurumurthy Ramachandran
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.718

9.  Evaluating oversight systems for emerging technologies: a case study of genetically engineered organisms.

Authors:  Jennifer Kuzma; Pouya Najmaie; Joel Larson
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.718

10.  Gene therapy oversight: lessons for nanobiotechnology.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf; Rishi Gupta; Peter Kohlhepp
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.718

View more
  1 in total

1.  From Nano Backlash to Public Indifference: Some Reflections on French Public Dialogues on Nanotechnology.

Authors:  Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent
Journal:  Nanoethics       Date:  2021-09-06       Impact factor: 0.917

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.