Literature DB >> 21836639

Renegotiating GM crop regulation. Targeted gene-modification technology raises new issues for the oversight of genetically modified crops.

Jennifer Kuzma1, Adam Kokotovich.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21836639      PMCID: PMC3166464          DOI: 10.1038/embor.2011.160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO Rep        ISSN: 1469-221X            Impact factor:   8.807


× No keyword cloud information.
  15 in total

1.  Coordinated framework for regulation of biotechnology; announcement of policy; notice for public comment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  1986-06-26

2.  Plant pests; introduction of organisms and products altered or produced through genetic engineering; proposed rule and notice of public hearings; Advanced notice of proposed guidelines for biotechnology research.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  1986-06-26

3.  Cisgenic plants are similar to traditionally bred plants: international regulations for genetically modified organisms should be altered to exempt cisgenesis.

Authors:  Henk J Schouten; Frans A Krens; Evert Jacobsen
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 4.  US regulatory system for genetically modified [genetically modified organism (GMO), rDNA or transgenic] crop cultivars.

Authors:  Alan McHughen; Stuart Smyth
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 9.803

5.  Upstream oversight assessment for agrifood nanotechnology: a case studies approach.

Authors:  Jennifer Kuzma; James Romanchek; Adam Kokotovich
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2008-07-04       Impact factor: 4.000

6.  An integrated approach to oversight assessment for emerging technologies.

Authors:  Jennifer Kuzma; Jordan Paradise; Gurumurthy Ramachandran; Jee-Ae Kim; Adam Kokotovich; Susan M Wolf
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 4.000

Review 7.  Risk assessment of genetically modified crops for nutrition and health.

Authors:  Javier A Magaña-Gómez; Ana M Calderón de la Barca
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 7.110

8.  Evaluating oversight systems for emerging technologies: a case study of genetically engineered organisms.

Authors:  Jennifer Kuzma; Pouya Najmaie; Joel Larson
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.718

9.  Field testing genetically modified organisms: framework for decisions. National Research Council executive summary.

Authors: 
Journal:  Recomb DNA Tech Bull       Date:  1989-09

10.  Heritable targeted mutagenesis in maize using a designed endonuclease.

Authors:  Huirong Gao; Jeff Smith; Meizhu Yang; Spencer Jones; Vesna Djukanovic; Michael G Nicholson; Ande West; Dennis Bidney; S Carl Falco; Derek Jantz; L Alexander Lyznik
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 6.417

View more
  12 in total

1.  Tiptoeing around transgenics.

Authors:  Emily Waltz
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 2.  Not all GMOs are crop plants: non-plant GMO applications in agriculture.

Authors:  K E Hokanson; W O Dawson; A M Handler; M F Schetelig; R J St Leger
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2013-11-17       Impact factor: 2.788

3.  Design for controllability.

Authors:  Hirokazu Tsukaya
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 8.807

4.  Transgenic or not? No simple answer! New biotechnology-based plant breeding techniques and the regulatory landscape.

Authors:  Nancy Podevin; Yann Devos; Howard Vivian Davies; Kaare Magne Nielsen
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 8.807

5.  Plant genome editing made easy: targeted mutagenesis in model and crop plants using the CRISPR/Cas system.

Authors:  Khaoula Belhaj; Angela Chaparro-Garcia; Sophien Kamoun; Vladimir Nekrasov
Journal:  Plant Methods       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 4.993

6.  Is biotechnology (more) acceptable when it enables a reduction in phytosanitary treatments? A European comparison of the acceptability of transgenesis and cisgenesis.

Authors:  Damien Rousselière; Samira Rousselière
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Is it only the regulatory status? Broadening the debate on cisgenic plants.

Authors:  Lilian van Hove; Frøydis Gillund
Journal:  Environ Sci Eur       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 5.893

8.  Essential Features of Responsible Governance of Agricultural Biotechnology.

Authors:  Sarah Hartley; Frøydis Gillund; Lilian van Hove; Fern Wickson
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 9.  The Regulatory Status of Genome-edited Crops.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Wolt; Kan Wang; Bing Yang
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 9.803

Review 10.  Towards inclusive social appraisal: risk, participation and democracy in governance of synthetic biology.

Authors:  Andrew Stirling; K R Hayes; Jason Delborne
Journal:  BMC Proc       Date:  2018-07-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.