Literature DB >> 1862424

Triangulation of pedicular instrumentation. A biomechanical analysis.

C M Ruland1, P C McAfee, K E Warden, B W Cunningham.   

Abstract

Tensile load-to-failure pullout tests were performed on 54 cadaveric spinal segments. The vertebrae were grouped by adjacent levels and matched for bone mineral density (g/cm2), which was measured by dual-photon absorptiometry. Triangulation of Steffee screws and CD pedicle screws was accomplished by transverse plates specifically designed to increase fixation within the same vertebra before the longitudinal Steffee plate or CD rod was applied. A transverse plate with adjustable length was also tested to accommodate variable interpedicular distances. Comparative pullout load-to-failures were as follows: laminar hook, 809 SE 99.4 N; single CD pedicular screws, 863 SE 108 N; single Steffee pedicular screw, 1245 SE 75.3 N; adjustable transverse plate, 1341 SE 114; triangulated Steffee pedicle screws with a transverse plate, 1701 SE 151 N; and triangulated CD pedicle screws with a transverse plate, 2096 SE 115 N. Three triangulated constructs with pedicle screws and a transverse plate (CD, Steffee, and Kirschner) provided significantly greater fixation than conventional pedicular or laminar hook based instrumentation systems (P less than 0.05). Improved treatment of spinal deformities in the elderly and osteoporotic population is dependent on improving the fixation at the metal-bone interface of spinal implants Particularly in osteoporotic vertebrae, the strength of fixation of two triangulated pedicle screws is better than either laminar hooks or single pedicle screws. The strength of fixation of triangulated pedicle screws connected by a transverse plate is superior to a single pedicle screw because it is dependent on the mass of bone between the screws rather than simply the amount of bone within the screw thread.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1862424     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199106001-00019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  13 in total

1.  Biomechanical evaluation of a bipedicular spinal fixation device: three different strength tests.

Authors:  Laurent Balabaud; Emeric Gallard; Wafa Skalli; Bernard Dupas; Robert Roger; François Lavaste; Jean-Paul Steib
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-04-05       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Experimental in vivo acute and chronic biomechanical and histomorphometrical comparison of self-drilling and self-tapping anterior cervical screws.

Authors:  Maximiliano Aguiar Porto; Patrícia Silva; Rodrigo Rosa; José Batista Volpon; Antônio Carlos Shimano; Francisco José Albuquerque de Paula; Helton Luiz Aparecido Defino
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Biomechanical analysis of differing pedicle screw insertion angles.

Authors:  William Sterba; Do-Gyoon Kim; David P Fyhrie; Yener N Yeni; Rahul Vaidya
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2007-01-08       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  Neurovascular risks of sacral screws with bicortical purchase: an anatomical study.

Authors:  Ipek Ergur; Omer Akcali; Amac Kiray; Can Kosay; Hamid Tayefi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  New means in spinal pedicle hook fixation. A biomechanical evaluation.

Authors:  U Berlemann; P Cripton; L P Nolte; K Lippuner; F Schläpfer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Reduction of lumbar spondylolisthesis using a CDI pedicle screw system.

Authors:  Y Aota; K Kumano; S Hirabayashi; Y Ogawa
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  Can intermuscular cleavage planes provide proper transverse screw angle? Comparison of two paraspinal approaches.

Authors:  Xiaofei Cheng; Bin Ni; Qi Liu; Jinshui Chen; Huapeng Guan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  [Trajectory of lumbar and sacral pedicular screws: Comparison between midline versus wiltse approach].

Authors:  Martín Gagliardi; Alfredo Guiroy; Federico Fernández Molina; Francisco Fasano; Alejandro Morales Ciancio; Juan José Mezzadri; Pablo Jalón
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2017-10-24

Review 9.  Designs and techniques that improve the pullout strength of pedicle screws in osteoporotic vertebrae: current status.

Authors:  Thomas M Shea; Jake Laun; Sabrina A Gonzalez-Blohm; James J Doulgeris; William E Lee; Kamran Aghayev; Frank D Vrionis
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  The Effects of Spinopelvic Parameters and Paraspinal Muscle Degeneration on S1 Screw Loosening.

Authors:  Jin-Bum Kim; Seung-Won Park; Young-Seok Lee; Taek-Kyun Nam; Yong-Sook Park; Young-Baeg Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2015-10-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.