Literature DB >> 17846804

Neurovascular risks of sacral screws with bicortical purchase: an anatomical study.

Ipek Ergur1, Omer Akcali, Amac Kiray, Can Kosay, Hamid Tayefi.   

Abstract

The aim of this cadaver study is to define the anatomic structures on anterior sacrum, which are under the risk of injury during bicortical screw application to the S1 and S2 pedicles. Thirty formaldehyde-preserved human male cadavers were studied. Posterior midline incision was performed, and soft tissues and muscles were dissected from the posterior part of the lumbosacral region. A 6 mm pedicle screw was inserted between the superior facet of S1 and the S1 foramen. The entry point of the S2 pedicle screw was located between S1 and S2 foramina. S1 and S2 screws were placed on both right and the left sides of all cadavers. Then, all cadavers were turned into supine position. All abdominal and pelvic organs were moved away and carefully observed for any injury. The tips of the sacral screws were marked and the relations with the anatomic structures were defined. The position of the sacral screws relative to the middle and lateral sacral arteries and veins, and the sacral sympathetic trunk were measured. There was no injury to the visceral organs. In four cases, S1 screw tip was in direct contact with middle sacral artery. In two cases, S1 screw tip was in direct contact with middle sacral vein. It was observed that the S1 screw tips were in close proximity to sacral sympathetic trunk on both right and the left sides. The tip of the S2 screw was in contact with middle sacral artery on the left side only in one case. It is found that the tip of the S2 screw was closely located with the middle sacral vein in two cases. The tip of the S2 pedicle screw was in contact with the sacral sympathetic trunk in eight cases on the right side and seven cases on the left side. Lateral sacral vein was also observed to be disturbed by the S1 and S2 screws. As a conclusion, anterior cortical penetration during sacral screw insertion carries a risk of neurovascular injury. The risk of sacral sympathetic trunk and minor vascular structures together with the major neurovascular structures and viscera should be kept in mind.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17846804      PMCID: PMC2200745          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-007-0326-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  20 in total

1.  Pitfalls of pedicle screw fixation in the sacrum. A cadaver model.

Authors:  N J Licht; D E Rowe; L M Ross
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Biomechanics of thoracolumbar spinal fixation. A review.

Authors:  M H Krag
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Surgical anatomy of the sacrum. A guide for rational screw fixation.

Authors:  S I Esses; D J Botsford; R J Huler; W Rauschning
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Anatomic considerations of the second sacral vertebra and dorsal screw placement.

Authors:  N A Ebraheim; J Lu; H Yang; B E Heck; R A Yeasting
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  Fusion of the lumbar and sacral spine by internal fixation with screw plates.

Authors:  R Louis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Preoperative CT determination of angles for sacral screw placement.

Authors:  B J Morse; N A Ebraheim; W T Jackson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Morphometric evaluation of the first sacral vertebra and the projection of its pedicle on the posterior aspect of the sacrum.

Authors:  R Xu; N A Ebraheim; R A Yeasting; F Y Wong; W T Jackson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Anatomic consideration for sacral screw placement.

Authors:  S Mirkovic; J J Abitbol; J Steinman; C C Edwards; M Schaffler; J Massie; S R Garfin
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Triangulation of pedicular instrumentation. A biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  C M Ruland; P C McAfee; K E Warden; B W Cunningham
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Internal fixation of the lumbar spine with pedicle screw plating.

Authors:  R Roy-Camille; G Saillant; C Mazel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  13 in total

1.  A study of sacral anthropometry to determine S1 screw placement for spinal lumbosacral fixation in the Korean population.

Authors:  Young-Yul Kim; Kee-Yong Ha; Sang-Il Kim; In-Soo Oh
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Awareness of the median sacral artery during lumbosacral spinal surgery: an anatomic cadaveric study of its relationship to the lumbosacral spine.

Authors:  Surachai Sae-Jung; Kimaporn Khamanarong; Worawut Woraputtaporn; Pattama Amarttayakong
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  The contribution of the cortical shell to pedicle screw fixation.

Authors:  Matthew Henry Pelletier; Nicky Bertollo; Darweesh Al-Khawaja; William Robert Walsh
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-06

4.  Primary Endovascular Repair of Ilio-Caval Injury Encountered during Anterior Exposure Spine Surgery: Evolution of the Paradigm.

Authors:  Patrick C Bonasso; Brandon P Lucke-Wold; Alexandre d'Audiffret; Lakshmikumar Pillai
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 1.466

5.  Morphometry of the iliolumbar artery and the iliolumbar veins and their correlations with the lumbosacral trunk and the obturator nerve.

Authors:  Chandrika Gurulingappa Teli; Nilesh Netaji Kate; Usha Kothandaraman
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-03-01

6.  L5 nerve root injury caused by anterolateral malpositioning of loosened S1 pedicle screws: illustrative cases.

Authors:  Shota Tamagawa; Takatoshi Okuda; Hidetoshi Nojiri; Rei Momomura; Muneaki Ishijima
Journal:  J Neurosurg Case Lessons       Date:  2021-06-21

7.  Comparative Radiographic Analyses and Clinical Outcomes Between O-Arm Navigated and Fluoroscopic-Guided Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Weerasak Singhatanadgige; Phattareeya Pholprajug; Kittisak Songthong; Wicharn Yingsakmongkol; Chanonta Triganjananun; Vit Kotheeranurak; Worawat Limthongkul
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2022-02-17

8.  L5 spinal nerve injury caused by misplacement of outwardly-inserted S1 pedicle screws.

Authors:  Masahiro Inoue; Gen Inoue; Tomoyuki Ozawa; Masayuki Miyagi; Hiroto Kamoda; Tetsuhiro Ishikawa; Miyako Suzuki; Yoshihiro Sakuma; Yasuhiro Oikawa; Kazuyo Yamauchi; Sumihisa Orita; Masashi Takaso; Tomoaki Toyone; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Seiji Ohtori
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Three-dimensional fluoroscopic navigation versus fluoroscopy-guided placement of pedicle screws in L4-L5-S1 fixation: single-centre experience of pedicular accuracy and S1 cortical fixation of 810 screws.

Authors:  Manuel García-Fantini; Ricardo De Casas
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-12

10.  Anatomical Location of the Common Iliac Veins at the Level of the Sacrum: Relationship between Perforation Risk and the Trajectory Angle of the Screw.

Authors:  Javid Akhgar; Hidetomi Terai; Mohammad Suhrab Rahmani; Koji Tamai; Akinobu Suzuki; Hiromitsu Toyoda; Masatoshi Hoshino; Sayed Abdullah Ahmadi; Kazunori Hayashi; Hiroaki Nakamura
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.