Literature DB >> 1862399

The effect of decompression on the natural course of spinal stenosis. A comparison of surgically treated and untreated patients.

K E Johnsson1, A Udén, I Rosén.   

Abstract

The clinical course of 19 untreated patients with spinal stenosis (mean age, 60 years) was compared with that of 44 patients treated surgically (mean age, 65 years). The time of follow-up was 31 and 53 months, respectively. About 80% of the patients had neurogenic intermittent claudication. In the follow-up, one third of the treated and one half of the untreated patients still had neurogenic claudication. By visual analogue-scale estimation, 60% of those treated surgically and 33% of the untreated patients felt better. Fifty-eight percent of the untreated patients were unchanged. Neurophysiologic changes showed progression in almost all cases; it was more pronounced in the treated patients. No proof of severe deterioration was found in the untreated patients, and observation for 2-3 years seems to be a good alternative to surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1862399     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199106000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  29 in total

1.  Elective lumbar spinal decompression in the elderly: is it a high-risk operation?

Authors:  Rudolf Reindl; Thomas Steffen; Lara Cohen; Max Aebi
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis four-year results of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial.

Authors:  James N Weinstein; Tor D Tosteson; Jon D Lurie; Anna Tosteson; Emily Blood; Harry Herkowitz; Frank Cammisa; Todd Albert; Scott D Boden; Alan Hilibrand; Harley Goldberg; Sigurd Berven; Howard An
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Spinal stenosis re-operation rate in Sweden is 11% at 10 years--a national analysis of 9,664 operations.

Authors:  Karl-Ake Jansson; Gunnar Németh; F Granath; P Blomqvist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Insertion loads of the X STOP interspinous process distraction system designed to treat neurogenic intermittent claudication.

Authors:  Vikram Talwar; Derek P Lindsey; Amy Fredrick; Ken Y Hsu; James F Zucherman; Scott A Yerby
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-05-31       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  [Spinal surgery in the elderly: does age have an influence on the complication rate?].

Authors:  R Sobottke; G Csécsei; T Kaulhausen; S Delank; J Franklin; E Aghayev; T Zweig; P Eysel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  James N Weinstein; Tor D Tosteson; Jon D Lurie; Anna N A Tosteson; Emily Blood; Brett Hanscom; Harry Herkowitz; Frank Cammisa; Todd Albert; Scott D Boden; Alan Hilibrand; Harley Goldberg; Sigurd Berven; Howard An
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  The who, what and when of surgery for the degenerative lumbar spine: a population-based study of surgeon factors, surgical procedures, recent trends and reoperation rates.

Authors:  S Samuel Bederman; Hans J Kreder; Iris Weller; Joel A Finkelstein; Michael H Ford; Albert J M Yee
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  Decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: long-term results.

Authors:  Ioannis D Gelalis; Kosmas S Stafilas; Anastasios V Korompilias; Konstantinos C Zacharis; Alexandros E Beris; Theodoros A Xenakis
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2005-11-25       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Can decompression surgery relieve low back pain in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis combined with degenerative lumbar scoliosis?

Authors:  Shunji Tsutsui; Ryohei Kagotani; Hiroshi Yamada; Hiroshi Hashizume; Akihito Minamide; Yukihiro Nakagawa; Hiroshi Iwasaki; Munehito Yoshida
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  The efficacy of physical therapy and physical therapy plus calcitonin in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Fusun Sahin; Figen Yilmaz; Nurdan Kotevoglu; Banu Kuran
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 2.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.