Literature DB >> 18621959

Do consequences of a given pattern of drinking vary by socioeconomic status? A mortality and hospitalisation follow-up for alcohol-related causes of the Finnish Drinking Habits Surveys.

P Mäkelä1, T Paljärvi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic differences in alcohol-related mortality and hospitalisations, as based on register data, are larger than socioeconomic differences in various types of harmful drinking, as based on survey data.
OBJECTIVE: The aim was to use a follow-up study to examine whether differential drinking patterns between socioeconomic groups explain the observed differences in alcohol-related mortality and hospitalisations, or whether similar drinking patterns predict higher mortality among lower socioeconomic groups.
METHOD: The study population included Finns who participated in cross-sectional surveys on drinking habits in 1969, 1976 or 1984 when aged 25-69 (n = 6406). They were followed up for alcohol-related mortality and hospitalisations (n = 180) for 16 years. Drinking patterns were measured by total consumption, frequency of subjective intoxication and of drinking different amounts of alcohol at a time, and by volume of consumption that was drunk in heavy drinking occasions and non-heavy drinking occasions.
RESULTS: Compared with non-manual workers, manual workers had a 2.06-fold hazard of alcohol-related death or hospitalisation. Adjustment for drinking patterns explained only a small fraction of the excess hazard among manual workers. Additionally, in each category of total consumption and in each level of the volume drunk in heavy drinking occasions, the risk of alcohol-related death and hospitalisation was higher for manual than for non-manual workers.
CONCLUSIONS: Consequences of similar drinking patterns are more severe for those with lower socioeconomic status. Future studies are needed to explain how higher socioeconomic groups manage to escape the consequences of drinking that others have to face.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18621959     DOI: 10.1136/jech.2007.065672

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  42 in total

1.  Smoking and Physical Inactivity as Predictors of Mobility Impairment During Late Life: Exploring Differential Vulnerability Across Education Level in Sweden.

Authors:  Neda Agahi; Stefan Fors; Johan Fritzell; Benjamin A Shaw
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 4.077

Review 2.  Socioeconomic differences in alcohol-attributable mortality compared with all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Charlotte Probst; Michael Roerecke; Silke Behrendt; Jürgen Rehm
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 7.196

3.  The Future of Research on Alcohol-Related Disparities Across U.S. Racial/Ethnic Groups: A Plan of Attack.

Authors:  Sarah E Zemore; Katherine J Karriker-Jaffe; Nina Mulia; William C Kerr; Cindy L Ehlers; Won Kim Cook; Priscilla Martinez; Camillia Lui; Thomas K Greenfield
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.582

4.  High alcohol consumption in middle-aged adults is associated with poorer cognitive performance only in the low socio-economic group. Results from the GAZEL cohort study.

Authors:  Séverine Sabia; Alice Guéguen; Claudine Berr; Lisa Berkman; Joël Ankri; Marcel Goldberg; Marie Zins; Archana Singh-Manoux
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 6.526

5.  Social inequalities and gender differences in the experience of alcohol-related problems.

Authors:  Ulrike Grittner; Sandra Kuntsche; Kathryn Graham; Kim Bloomfield
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 2.826

6.  Correlation between the prevalence of T-cell lymphomas and alcohol consumption.

Authors:  Minodora Desmirean; Cedric Richlitzki; Sergiu Pasca; Patric Teodorescu; Bobe Petrushev; Sebastian Rauch; Jacob Steinheber; Sabina Iluta; Jiaxin Liu; Delia Dima; Ravnit Grewal; Weina Ma; Liren Qian; Ciprian Tomuleasa
Journal:  Med Pharm Rep       Date:  2021-07-29

7.  Social disparities in hazardous alcohol use: self-report bias may lead to incorrect estimates.

Authors:  Marion Devaux; Franco Sassi
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 3.367

8.  Trends in alcohol-related mortality by educational attainment in the U.S., 2000-2017.

Authors:  Yana C Vierboom
Journal:  Popul Res Policy Rev       Date:  2019-04-05

Review 9.  Beyond Behaviour: How Health Inequality Theory Can Enhance Our Understanding of the 'Alcohol-Harm Paradox'.

Authors:  Jennifer Boyd; Clare Bambra; Robin C Purshouse; John Holmes
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 4.614

10.  Use of record-linkage to handle non-response and improve alcohol consumption estimates in health survey data: a study protocol.

Authors:  Linsay Gray; Gerry McCartney; Ian R White; Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi; Lisa Rutherford; Emma Gorman; Alastair H Leyland
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.