Literature DB >> 18621074

Retinotopic encoding of the direction aftereffect.

Peter Wenderoth1, Mark Wiese.   

Abstract

Kohn and Movshon [Kohn, A., & Movshon, J. (2003). Neuronal adaptation to visual motion in area MT of the macaque. Neuron, 39, 681-691; Kohn, A., & Movshon, J. A. (2004). Adaptation changes the direction tuning of macaque MT neurons. Nature Neuroscience, 7(7), 764-772] measured the contrast response functions of single neurons in MT (V5) before and after adaptation to high contrast gratings. They found that when gratings were smaller than the MT receptive field, so that adapting and test regions could be either co-localised or non-overlapping, adaptation was spatially specific. This led to the hypothesis that grating adaptation occurs in V1, where receptive fields are small and retinotopically organized, and that MT merely inherits this adaptation. We predicted that spatial specificity would be less for dot stimuli that probably adapt MT cells directly. Also, given recent contradictory claims that hMT primarily exhibits both spatiotopy [d'Avossa, G., Tosetti, M., Crespi, S., Biagi, L., Burr, D., & Morrone, M. (2006). Spatiotopic selectivity of BOLD responses to visual motion in human area MT. Nature Neuroscience, 10, 249-255] and retinotopy [Gardner, J. L., Merriam, E. P., Movshon, J. A., & Heeger, D. J. (2008). Maps of visual space in human occipital cortex are retinotopic, not spatiotopic. The Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 3988-3999], we were interested in producing relevant psychophysical evidence using the direction aftereffect. In three experiments, we measured direction aftereffects (DAEs) induced and tested either with drifting gratings or drifting dots when stimulus location was changed both retinotopically and spatiotopically between adaptation and test; when retinotopic location only was changed; and when spatiotopic location only was changed. We predicted and found that spatial specificity was greater for gratings than for dots. We also found very small spatiotopic effects that call into question some recent claims that area MT exhibits a high degree of spatiotopicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18621074     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.06.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  25 in total

1.  Remapping of the line motion illusion across eye movements.

Authors:  David Melcher; Alessio Fracasso
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-04       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Visual attention and stability.

Authors:  Sebastiaan Mathôt; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Spatiotopic coding and remapping in humans.

Authors:  David C Burr; Maria Concetta Morrone
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Adaptation aftereffects reveal that tactile distance is a basic somatosensory feature.

Authors:  Elena Calzolari; Elena Azañón; Matthew Danvers; Giuseppe Vallar; Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Object-location binding across a saccade: A retinotopic spatial congruency bias.

Authors:  Anna Shafer-Skelton; Colin N Kupitz; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 6.  A review of visual aftereffects in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Katharine N Thakkar; Steven M Silverstein; Jan W Brascamp
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  Attentional load interferes with target localization across saccades.

Authors:  W Joseph MacInnes; Amelia R Hunt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  Visual perception and saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Michael Ibbotson; Bart Krekelberg
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 6.627

9.  A (fascinating) litmus test for human retino- vs. non-retinotopic processing.

Authors:  Marco Boi; Haluk Oğmen; Joseph Krummenacher; Thomas U Otto; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Visual stability and the motion aftereffect: a psychophysical study revealing spatial updating.

Authors:  Ulrich Biber; Uwe J Ilg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.