Literature DB >> 18612817

Are 12 nodes needed to accurately stage T1 and T2 colon cancers?

Melinda A Maggard1, Irina Yermilov, James S Tomlinson, Clifford Y Ko.   

Abstract

Evaluation of 12 lymph nodes has been mandated to prevent colon cancer understaging. Given that the probability of node metastases is largely associated with T-stage, are <12 nodes substandard for T1 and T2 lesions? We evaluated if survival for T1 and T2 tumors varies by nodes examined. In SEER, 61,237 patients undergoing colon cancer resection were identified. For each T-stage, 5-year survival rates were compared for node-negative cancers by using stepwise node cut-point comparisons (4 nodes, <4, etc.). Survival impact was determined by log-rank test and hazard regression. For T1 tumors, 4 nodes had 24% lower hazard of death compared to <4. For T2 tumors, 10 nodes had the biggest survival impact, 15% lower hazard of death. In conclusion, the number of nodes to stage T1 and T2 lesions may be <12.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18612817     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-008-0373-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  26 in total

1.  Comparative efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with Dukes' B versus Dukes' C colon cancer: results from four National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project adjuvant studies (C-01, C-02, C-03, and C-04)

Authors:  E Mamounas; S Wieand; N Wolmark; H D Bear; J N Atkins; K Song; J Jones; H Rockette
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Is there a minimum number of lymph nodes that should be histologically assessed for a reliable nodal staging of T3N0M0 colorectal carcinomas?

Authors:  Gábor Cserni; Vincent Vinh-Hung; Tomasz Burzykowski
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  Clinicopathological staging for colorectal cancer: an International Documentation System (IDS) and an International Comprehensive Anatomical Terminology (ICAT).

Authors:  L P Fielding; P A Arsenault; P H Chapuis; O Dent; B Gathright; J D Hardcastle; P Hermanek; J R Jass; R C Newland
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.029

4.  Impact of number of nodes retrieved on outcome in patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  J E Tepper; M J O'Connell; D Niedzwiecki; D Hollis; C Compton; A B Benson; B Cummings; L Gunderson; J S Macdonald; R J Mayer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Lymph node recovery from colorectal resection specimens removed for adenocarcinoma. Trends over time and a recommendation for a minimum number of lymph nodes to be recovered.

Authors:  N S Goldstein; W Sanford; M Coffey; L J Layfield
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.493

6.  Number of nodes examined and staging accuracy in colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  J H Wong; R Severino; M B Honnebier; P Tom; T S Namiki
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  College of American Pathologists Conference XXXV: solid tumor prognostic factors-which, how and so what? Summary document and recommendations for implementation. Cancer Committee and Conference Participants.

Authors:  M E Hammond; P L Fitzgibbons; C C Compton; D J Grignon; D L Page; L P Fielding; D Bostwick; T F Pajak
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.534

8.  For patients with Dukes' B (TNM Stage II) colorectal carcinoma, examination of six or fewer lymph nodes is related to poor prognosis.

Authors:  S Caplin; J P Cerottini; F T Bosman; M T Constanda; J C Givel
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1998-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Can depth of tumour invasion predict lymph node positivity in patients undergoing resection for early rectal cancer? A comparative study between T1 and T2 cancers.

Authors:  S Rasheed; D M Bowley; O Aziz; P P Tekkis; A E Sadat; T Guenther; M L Boello; P J McDonald; I C Talbot; J M A Northover
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.788

10.  Adequacy of nodal harvest in colorectal cancer: a consecutive cohort study.

Authors:  Paul M Johnson; Dickram Malatjalian; Geoff A Porter
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.267

View more
  5 in total

1.  Is there a reliable minimum number of lymph nodes for T1 and T2 colon cancer?

Authors:  Konradin Metze; Randall L Adam
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Additional colectomy after colonoscopic polypectomy for T1 colon cancer: a fine balance between oncologic benefit and operative risk.

Authors:  Emmanuel I Benizri; Jean-Marc Bereder; Amine Rahili; Jean-Louis Bernard; Geoffroy Vanbiervliet; Jérôme Filippi; Xavier Hébuterne; Daniel Benchimol
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Influence of extent of lymph node dissection on survival for patients with pT2 colon cancer.

Authors:  Kenjiro Kotake; Hirotoshi Kobayashi; Michio Asano; Heita Ozawa; Kenichi Sugihara
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Stage migration vs immunology: The lymph node count story in colon cancer.

Authors:  Bruno Märkl
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  The prognostic value of lymph node yield in the earliest stage of colorectal cancer: a multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  Yara Backes; Sjoerd G Elias; Bibie S Bhoelan; John N Groen; Jeroen van Bergeijk; Tom C J Seerden; Hendrikus J M Pullens; Bernhard W M Spanier; Joost M J Geesing; Koen Kessels; Marjon Kerkhof; Peter D Siersema; Wouter H de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel; Niels van Lelyveld; Frank H J Wolfhagen; Frank Ter Borg; G Johan A Offerhaus; Miangela M Lacle; Leon M G Moons
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 8.775

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.