Literature DB >> 18605873

Investigating linguistic relativity through bilingualism: the case of grammatical gender.

Stavroula-Thaleia Kousta1, David P Vinson, Gabriella Vigliocco.   

Abstract

The authors investigated linguistic relativity effects by examining the semantic effects of grammatical gender (present in Italian but absent in English) in fluent bilingual speakers as compared with monolingual speakers. In an error-induction experiment, they used responses by monolingual speakers to establish a baseline for bilingual speakers and show that gender affects the semantic substitution errors made by monolingual Italian speakers compared with monolingual English speakers. They then showed that Italian-English bilingual speakers behave like monolingual English speakers when the task is in English and like monolingual Italian speakers when the task is in Italian, hence exhibiting appropriate semantic representations for each language. These results show that for bilingual speakers there is intraspeaker relativity in semantic representations and, therefore, that gender does not have a conceptual, nonlinguistic effect. The results also have implications for models of bilingual semantic memory and processing. (c) 2008 APA

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18605873     DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.843

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  9 in total

1.  Lexical factors in conceptual processes: The relationship between semantic representations and their corresponding phonological and orthographic lexical forms.

Authors:  Orna Peleg; Lee Edelist; Zohar Eviatar; Dafna Bergerbest
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-05

2.  Potential differences between monolingual and bilingual patients in approach and outcome after awake brain surgery.

Authors:  Karim ReFaey; Shashwat Tripathi; Adip G Bhargav; Sanjeet S Grewal; Erik H Middlebrooks; David S Sabsevitz; Mark Jentoft; Peter Brunner; Adela Wu; William O Tatum; Anthony Ritaccio; Kaisorn L Chaichana; Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  How Persistent are Grammatical Gender Effects? The Case of German and Tamil.

Authors:  Peter Sedlmeier; Arun Tipandjan; Anastasia Jänchen
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2016-04

4.  Grammatical gender and linguistic relativity: A systematic review.

Authors:  Steven Samuel; Geoff Cole; Madeline J Eacott
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-12

5.  Grammatical Gender and Mental Representation of Object: The Case of Musical Instruments.

Authors:  Jasmina Vuksanović; Jovana Bjekić; Natalija Radivojević
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2015-08

6.  Do grammatical-gender distinctions learned in the second language influence native-language lexical processing?

Authors:  Margarita Kaushanskaya; Samantha Smith
Journal:  Int J Billing       Date:  2015-03-30

7.  Grammatical Gender Influences Semantic Categorization and Implicit Cognition in Polish.

Authors:  Józef Maciuszek; Mateusz Polak; Natalia Świa Tkowska
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-10-04

8.  Linguistic features of fragrances: The role of grammatical gender and gender associations.

Authors:  Laura J Speed; Asifa Majid
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Mental Representations of Time in English Monolinguals, Mandarin Monolinguals, and Mandarin-English Bilinguals.

Authors:  Wenxing Yang; Yiting Gu; Ying Fang; Ying Sun
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-02-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.