Literature DB >> 18605475

The Prep statistic as a measure of confidence in model fitting.

F Gregory Ashby1, Jeffrey B O'Brien.   

Abstract

In traditional statistical methodology (e.g., the ANOVA), confidence in the observed results is often assessed by computing thep value or the power of the test. In most cases, adding more participants to a study will improve these measures more than will increasing the amount of data collected from each participant. Thus, traditional statistical methods are biased in favor of experiments with large numbers of participants. This article proposes a method for computing confidence in the results of experiments in which data are collected from a few participants over many trials. In such experiments, it is common to fit a series of mathematical models to the resulting data and to conclude that the best-fitting model is superior. The probability of replicating this result (i.e., Prep) is derived for any two nested models. Simulations and empirical applications of this new statistic confirm its utility in studies in which data are collected from a few participants over many trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18605475     DOI: 10.3758/pbr.15.1.16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  20 in total

1.  Statistical Tests for Comparing Possibly Misspecified and Nonnested Models.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.223

2.  Information-accumulation theory of speeded categorization.

Authors:  K Lamberts
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Toward an explanation of the power law artifact: insights from response surface analysis.

Authors:  I J Myung; C Kim; M A Pitt
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-07

4.  Attention orienting and the time course of perceptual decisions: response time distributions with masked and unmasked displays.

Authors:  Philip L Smith; Roger Ratcliff; Bradley J Wolfgang
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Probability of replication revisited: comment on "An alternative to Null-Hypothesis Significance Tests.".

Authors:  Gheorghe Doros; Andrew B Geier
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-12

6.  Understanding the average probability of replication: comment on Killeen (2005).

Authors:  Geoff Cumming
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-12

7.  The effect of stimulus strength on the speed and accuracy of a perceptual decision.

Authors:  John Palmer; Alexander C Huk; Michael N Shadlen
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-05-02       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1986-03

9.  Array models for category learning.

Authors:  W K Estes
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning.

Authors:  F G Ashby; L A Alfonso-Reese; A U Turken; E M Waldron
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  5 in total

1.  Replication is not coincidence: reply to Iverson, Lee, and Wagenmakers (2009).

Authors:  Bruno Lecoutre; Peter R Killeen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-04

2.  Markov model of smoking cessation.

Authors:  Peter R Killeen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Initial training with difficult items facilitates information integration, but not rule-based category learning.

Authors:  Brian J Spiering; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-11

4.  The dynamics of conditioning and extinction.

Authors:  Peter R Killeen; Federico Sanabria; Igor Dolgov
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2009-10

5.  Evidence for impulsivity in the Spontaneously Hypertensive Rat drawn from complementary response-withholding tasks.

Authors:  Federico Sanabria; Peter R Killeen
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 3.759

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.