Literature DB >> 31776230

British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland/Public Health England post-polypectomy and post-colorectal cancer resection surveillance guidelines.

Matthew D Rutter1,2, James East3, Colin J Rees2,4, Neil Cripps5, James Docherty6, Sunil Dolwani7, Philip V Kaye8, Kevin J Monahan9,10, Marco R Novelli11, Andrew Plumb12, Brian P Saunders13, Siwan Thomas-Gibson14, Damian J M Tolan15, Sophie Whyte16, Stewart Bonnington17, Alison Scope16, Ruth Wong16, Barbara Hibbert18, John Marsh18, Billie Moores19, Amanda Cross20, Linda Sharp21.   

Abstract

These consensus guidelines were jointly commissioned by the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG), the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) and Public Health England (PHE). They provide an evidence-based framework for the use of surveillance colonoscopy and non-colonoscopic colorectal imaging in people aged 18 years and over. They are the first guidelines that take into account the introduction of national bowel cancer screening. For the first time, they also incorporate surveillance of patients following resection of either adenomatous or serrated polyps and also post-colorectal cancer resection. They are primarily aimed at healthcare professionals, and aim to address:Which patients should commence surveillance post-polypectomy and post-cancer resection?What is the appropriate surveillance interval?When can surveillance be stopped? two or more premalignant polyps including at least one advanced colorectal polyp (defined as a serrated polyp of at least 10 mm in size or containing any grade of dysplasia, or an adenoma of at least 10 mm in size or containing high-grade dysplasia); or five or more premalignant polyps The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument provided a methodological framework for the guidelines. The BSG's guideline development process was used, which is National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) compliant.two or more premalignant polyps including at least one advanced colorectal polyp (defined as a serrated polyp of at least 10 mm in size or containing any grade of dysplasia, or an adenoma of at least 10 mm in size or containing high-grade dysplasia); or five or more premalignant polyps The key recommendations are that the high-risk criteria for future colorectal cancer (CRC) following polypectomy comprise either:two or more premalignant polyps including at least one advanced colorectal polyp (defined as a serrated polyp of at least 10 mm in size or containing any grade of dysplasia, or an adenoma of at least 10 mm in size or containing high-grade dysplasia); or five or more premalignant polyps This cohort should undergo a one-off surveillance colonoscopy at 3 years. Post-CRC resection patients should undergo a 1 year clearance colonoscopy, then a surveillance colonoscopy after 3 more years. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  colonic polyps; colonoscopy; colorectal adenomas; colorectal cancer; surveillance

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31776230      PMCID: PMC6984062          DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319858

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   31.793


  154 in total

Review 1.  Colonoscopy perforation rate, mechanisms and outcome: from diagnostic to therapeutic colonoscopy.

Authors:  V Panteris; J Haringsma; E J Kuipers
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 10.093

2.  Colorectal cancer screening for average-risk adults: 2018 guideline update from the American Cancer Society.

Authors:  Andrew M D Wolf; Elizabeth T H Fontham; Timothy R Church; Christopher R Flowers; Carmen E Guerra; Samuel J LaMonte; Ruth Etzioni; Matthew T McKenna; Kevin C Oeffinger; Ya-Chen Tina Shih; Louise C Walter; Kimberly S Andrews; Otis W Brawley; Durado Brooks; Stacey A Fedewa; Deana Manassaram-Baptiste; Rebecca L Siegel; Richard C Wender; Robert A Smith
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 508.702

3.  Is forceps more useful than visualization for measurement of colon polyp size?

Authors:  Jae Hyun Kim; Seun Ja Park; Jong Hoon Lee; Tae Oh Kim; Hyun Jin Kim; Hyung Wook Kim; Sang Heon Lee; Dong Hoon Baek; Busan Ulsan Gyeongnam Intestinal Study Group Society Bigs
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Colorectal cancer in patients under close colonoscopic surveillance.

Authors:  Douglas J Robertson; E Robert Greenberg; Michael Beach; Robert S Sandler; Dennis Ahnen; Robert W Haile; Carol A Burke; Dale C Snover; Robert S Bresalier; Gail McKeown-Eyssen; Jack S Mandel; John H Bond; Rosalind U Van Stolk; Robert W Summers; Richard Rothstein; Timothy R Church; Bernard F Cole; Tim Byers; Leila Mott; John A Baron
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Correction: Advanced imaging for detection and differentiation of colorectal neoplasia: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2019.

Authors:  Raf Bisschops; James E East; Cesare Hassan; Yark Hazewinkel; Michał F Kamiński; Helmut Neumann; Maria Pellisé; Giulio Antonelli; Marco Bustamante Balen; Emmanuel Coron; Georges Cortas; Marietta Iacucci; Mori Yuichi; Gaius Longcroft-Wheaton; Serguei Mouzyka; Nastazja Pilonis; Ignasi Puig; Jeanin E van Hooft; Evelien Dekker
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 10.093

6.  Variation in polyp size estimation among endoscopists and impact on surveillance intervals.

Authors:  Louis Chaptini; Adib Chaaya; Fedele Depalma; Krystal Hunter; Steven Peikin; Loren Laine
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Adenoma recurrence after piecemeal colonic EMR is predictable: the Sydney EMR recurrence tool.

Authors:  David J Tate; Lobke Desomer; Amir Klein; Gregor Brown; Luke F Hourigan; Eric Y T Lee; Alan Moss; Donald Ormonde; Spiro Raftopoulos; Rajvinder Singh; Stephen J Williams; Simon Zanati; Karen Byth; Michael J Bourke
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Surveillance after positive colonoscopy based on adenoma characteristics.

Authors:  Ido Laish; Ilia Seregeev; Timna Naftali; Fred M Konikoff
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 4.088

9.  Risk Factors for Recurrent High-Risk Polyps after the Removal of High-Risk Polyps at Initial Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Hui Won Jang; Soo Jung Park; Sung Pil Hong; Jae Hee Cheon; Won Ho Kim; Tae Il Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.759

Review 10.  What do patients want from their endoscopy experience? The importance of measuring and understanding patient attitudes to their care.

Authors:  M Tierney; R Bevan; C J Rees; T M Trebble
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-06-03
View more
  40 in total

1.  Colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy for follow-up of patients with left-sided diverticulitis.

Authors:  Z Abdulazeez; N Kukreja; N Qureshi; S Lascelles
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Real-life cost savings and capacity improvements on implementation of the new BSG post-polypectomy surveillance guideline.

Authors:  Benjamin Shandro; Vincent Chang; Jai Mathur; Parker O'Neill; Christopher Groves; Gareth Sadler; Andrew Poullis
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.659

3.  UEG Week 2020 Poster Presentations.

Authors: 
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 4.  Exploring polyps to colon carcinoma voyage: can blocking the crossroad halt the sequence?

Authors:  Abdul Arif Khan
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Restarting gastrointestinal endoscopy in the deceleration and early recovery phases of COVID-19 pandemic: Guidance from the British Society of Gastroenterology.

Authors:  Colin J Rees; James E East; Kofi Oppong; Andrew Veitch; Mark McAlindon; John Anderson; Bu Hayee; Cathryn Edwards; Alastair McKinlay; Ian Penman
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 2.659

6.  5-Aminosalicylic acid inhibits stem cell function in human adenoma-derived cells: implications for chemoprophylaxis in colorectal tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Tom Julian Creed; Ann Caroline Williams; Steven William Dixon; Tracey Jane Collard; Eleanor May Harrisdotter Mortensson; Danny Nigel Legge; Adam Christian Chambers; Alexander Greenhough
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 9.075

7.  Randomised comparison of postpolypectomy surveillance intervals following a two-round baseline colonoscopy: the Japan Polyp Study Workgroup.

Authors:  Takahisa Matsuda; Takahiro Fujii; Yasushi Sano; Shin-Ei Kudo; Yasushi Oda; Kinichi Hotta; Tadakazu Shimoda; Yutaka Saito; Nozomu Kobayashi; Masau Sekiguchi; Kazuo Konishi; Hiroaki Ikematsu; Hiroyasu Iishi; Yoji Takeuchi; Masahiro Igarashi; Kiyonori Kobayashi; Miwa Sada; Yuichiro Yamaguchi; Kiwamu Hasuda; Tomoaki Shinohara; Hideki Ishikawa; Yoshitaka Murakami; Hirokazu Taniguchi; Takahiro Fujimori; Yoichi Ajioka; Shigeaki Yoshida
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 8.  Post-polypectomy surveillance colonoscopy: Comparison of the updated guidelines.

Authors:  Naim Abu-Freha; Lior H Katz; Revital Kariv; Elez Vainer; Ido Laish; Nathan Gluck; Elizabeth E Half; Zohar Levi
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 4.623

9.  Metachronous neoplasms in patients with laterally spreading tumours during surveillance.

Authors:  Roel M M Bogie; Bjorn Winkens; Sean J J Retra; Chantal M C le Clercq; Mariëlle W Bouwens; Eveline J A Rondagh; Li-Chun Chang; Rogier de Ridder; Chantal Hoge; Jan-Willem Straathof; Danny Goudkade; Silvia Sanduleanu-Dascalescu; Ad A M Masclee
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 4.623

10.  The Fast Track FIT study: diagnostic accuracy of faecal immunochemical test for haemoglobin in patients with suspected colorectal cancer.

Authors:  James L Turvill; Daniel Turnock; Dan Cottingham; Monica Haritakis; Laura Jeffery; Annabelle Girdwood; Tom Hearfield; Alex Mitchell; Ada Keding
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 6.302

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.