Literature DB >> 4054062

Follow-up of patients with colorectal adenomas.

W Matek, I Guggenmoos-Holzmann, L Demling.   

Abstract

With the aim of establishing suitable follow-up intervals, we examined the probability for the recurrence of relevant adenomas in the colorectum. A total of 592 adenoma patients in whom colonoscopy up to the caecum had reliably excluded relevant findings, were admitted to the study. Relevant findings were considered to be 1) colorectal carcinoma, 2) an adenoma with severe cellular atypia, 3) an adenoma of at least 5 mm in diameter, 4) a histologically unclassified polyp of at least 5 mm in diameter. We were able to show that the use of a dose-effect relationship is statistically justified for the follow-up results of the 592 patients. Thus, the probability for renewed relevant findings at any given time can be computed on the basis of the follow-up results. Renewed relevant findings were presented by 6.0% of patients with single adenomas after 4 years (confidence level 4.8-7.3%), while 5.7% of patients with multiple adenomas had relevant findings after 2 years (confidence level 4.5-7.0%). These follow-up intervals are, thanks to the adequate detection rate, economical and, at the same time, safeguard adenoma patients with a high level of reliability, against cancer of the colorectum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4054062     DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1018494

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  19 in total

1.  Large bowel adenomas containing carcinoma--a diagnostic and therapeutic approach.

Authors:  F P Rossini; A Ferrari; S Coverlizza; M Spandre; M Risio; C Gemme; M Cavallero
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Risk and surveillance of individuals with colorectal polyps. Who Collaborating Centre for the Prevention of Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  S J Winawer; M J O'Brien; J D Waye; O Kronborg; J Bond; P Frühmorgen; L H Sobin; R Burt; A Zauber; B Morson
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 3.  Cost-effective management of colon and rectal cancer.

Authors:  J A Heine; D A Rothenberger
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Rate and Risk Factors of the Advanced Adenomas Among Diminutive Colorectal Polyps.

Authors:  Ali Aktekin; Nil Comunoglu; Mehmet Odabasi; Tolga Muftuoglu; Gunay Gurleyik; Gul Babacan Abanonu
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 0.656

5.  Associations between tumor markers and the risk of colorectal polyp recurrence in Chinese people.

Authors:  Jing Tong; Ying Wang; Bing Chang; Dai Zhang; Bingyuan Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-04-15

6.  Rectal epithelial cell proliferation patterns as predictors of adenomatous colorectal polyp recurrence.

Authors:  M Anti; G Marra; F Armelao; A Percesepe; R Ficarelli; G M Ricciuto; A Valenti; G L Rapaccini; I De Vitis; G D'Agostino
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Risk related surveillance following colorectal polypectomy.

Authors:  G Nusko; U Mansmann; Th Kirchner; E G Hahn
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Computed tomography colonography for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Virendra Tewari; Deepali Tewari; Frank G Gress
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2013-03

9.  Risk of advanced metachronous colorectal adenoma during long-term follow-up.

Authors:  G Nusko; E G Hahn; U Mansmann
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Endoscopic and histopathologic predictors of recurrence of colorectal adenoma on lowering the miss rate.

Authors:  Jeong-Seon Ji; Kyu-Yong Choi; Won-Chul Lee; Bo-In Lee; Soo-Heon Park; Hwang Choi; Byung-Wook Kim; Hiun-Suk Chae; Yong-Moon Park; Young-Jun Park
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 3.165

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.