Literature DB >> 12094877

New occurrence and recurrence of neoplasms within 5 years of a screening colonoscopy.

Benjamin Avidan1, Amnon Sonnenberg, Thomas G Schnell, Jack Leya, Adrienne Metz, Stephen J Sontag.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The fear that colorectal adenomas were missed on initial colonoscopy or that new adenomas have developed is often a rationale for repeating a colonoscopic examination. The aim of this study was to delineate risk factors associated with recurrence of colorectal adenomas after an initial baseline screening colonoscopy.
METHODS: The study population comprised 875 subjects who underwent a baseline screening colonoscopy followed by a second examination 1-5 yr later. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess the influence of potential risk factors on the occurrence or recurrence of colorectal adenomas, the strength of the influence being expressed as an OR with a 95% CI.
RESULTS: Colorectal adenomas were detected in 484 of all patients (55%) at baseline colonoscopy. Within a 1- to 5-yr time interval, 181 patients (37%) had recurrent adenomas (adenomas were removed during the first colonoscopy) and 73 patients (19%) had newly developed adenomas (adenomas were absent on the first colonoscopy). The occurrence of adenomas at baseline screening colonoscopy was the only factor associated with an increased risk for the recurrence of adenomas at follow-up (OR = 2.51, 95% CI = 1.77-3.55). Recurrence was associated with multiple baseline adenomas (4.45, 2.98-6.64) and baseline adenomas larger than 1 cm (2.62, 1.99-3.11). Recurrence was not associated with histology type or family history of colorectal cancer. There was a significant trend for adenomas to recur in the same proximal or distal segment as the baseline adenomas (p = 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: Colon adenomas tend to recur with greater frequency if the adenomas removed at baseline were either large or multiple. Although patients with large adenomas or multiple adenomas at baseline screening colonoscopy are at a 2.6- to 4.5-fold risk for recurrence of adenomas, the rate of de novo adenoma formation in patients without baseline adenomas may be large enough to warrant repeat colonoscopy at some time in the future. The exact timing of the follow-up colonoscopy needs to be determined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12094877     DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05801.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  21 in total

1.  Expert commentary--virtual colonoscopy: utility as a screening test for colorectal cancer?

Authors:  Michael L Kochman; Bernard Levin
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2004-01-26

2.  Probability of high-risk colorectal neoplasm recurrence based on the results of two previous colonoscopies.

Authors:  Hye Won Park; Seungbong Han; Ji Young Lee; Hye-Sook Chang; Jaewon Choe; Yunsik Choi; Hoonsub So; Dong-Hoon Yang; Seung-Jae Myung; Suk-Kyun Yang; Jin-Ho Kim; Jeong-Sik Byeon
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-08-24       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  Accuracy of fecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Lee; Elizabeth G Liles; Stephen Bent; Theodore R Levin; Douglas A Corley
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Gender disparities in colorectal cancer screening: true or false?

Authors:  Rachel A Callcut; Stephanie Kaufman; Robert Stone-Newsom; Patrick Remington; David Mahvi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 5.  [Early diagnosis of colorectal tumors].

Authors:  C Lamberti; T Sauerbruch
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 0.743

6.  One year recurrence of aberrant crypt foci.

Authors:  Paul F Pinsky; James Fleshman; Matt Mutch; Christopher Rall; Aline Charabaty; David Seligson; Sarah Dry; Asad Umar; Robert E Schoen
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2010-06-22

7.  Cost-benefit analysis of screening colonoscopy in 40- to 50-year-old first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Markus Menges; Barbara Gärtner; Thomas Georg; Johannes Fischinger; Martin Zeitz
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-11-12       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Polyp surveillance.

Authors:  W Donald Buie; Anthony R MacLean
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-11

9.  Consumption of trans-fatty acid and its association with colorectal adenomas.

Authors:  Lisa C Vinikoor; Jane C Schroeder; Robert C Millikan; Jessie A Satia; Christopher F Martin; Joseph Ibrahim; Joseph A Galanko; Robert S Sandler
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Endoscopic and histopathologic predictors of recurrence of colorectal adenoma on lowering the miss rate.

Authors:  Jeong-Seon Ji; Kyu-Yong Choi; Won-Chul Lee; Bo-In Lee; Soo-Heon Park; Hwang Choi; Byung-Wook Kim; Hiun-Suk Chae; Yong-Moon Park; Young-Jun Park
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 3.165

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.