Literature DB >> 18596695

What process attributes of clinical genetics services could maximise patient benefits?

Marion McAllister1, Katherine Payne, Rhona Macleod, Stuart Nicholls, Dian Donnai, Linda Davies.   

Abstract

There is limited evidence about what process attributes of clinical genetics services may be highly valued by patients and service providers. The aim in this qualitative grounded theory study was to explore what process attributes may be highly valued by those stakeholders. Seven focus groups (n=33) and nineteen one-to-one interviews were conducted (total sample size=52). Five process attributes were identified as highly valued by patients and health professionals: (1) local and accessible services (2) open access and follow-up, (3) coordinated, tailored family care, (4) quality of the patient-clinician relationship and (5) time to talk. These findings will be useful in designing models of service delivery that could be tested in intervention studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18596695     DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2008.121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  21 in total

1.  Empowerment: qualitative underpinning of a new clinical genetics-specific patient-reported outcome.

Authors:  Marion McAllister; Graham Dunn; Chris Todd
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Roles of genetic counselors in South Africa.

Authors:  Jennifer G R Kromberg; Tina-Marié Wessels; Amanda Krause
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Fair allocation of health-care resources: finding a model that does not disenfranchise users of genetic services. A commentary on Rogowski et al....

Authors:  Heather Skirton
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Identifying outcomes of clinical genetic services: qualitative evidence and methodological considerations.

Authors:  Christalla Pithara
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Explaining Mendelian inheritance in genetic consultations: an IPR study of counselor and counselee experiences.

Authors:  Theodora Gale; Sara Pasalodos-Sanchez; Lauren Kerzin-Storrar; Georgina Hall; Rhona MacLeod
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Grounded theory in genetic counseling research: an interpretive perspective.

Authors:  Robin E Grubs; Maria Piantanida
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Communicating microarray results of uncertain clinical significance in consultation summary letters and implications for practice.

Authors:  Jean Lillian Paul; Rachel Pope-Couston; Samantha Wake; Trent Burgess; Tiong Yang Tan
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  The perceived impact of the European registration system for genetic counsellors and nurses.

Authors:  Milena Paneque; Ramona Moldovan; Christophe Cordier; Clara Serra-Juhé; Irene Feroce; Sara Pasalodos; Emmanuelle Haquet; Debby Lambert; Inga Bjørnevoll; Heather Skirton
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  What counts as effective genetic counselling for presymptomatic testing in late-onset disorders? A study of the consultand's perspective.

Authors:  Lídia Guimarães; Jorge Sequeiros; Heather Skirton; Milena Paneque
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Complementarity between medical geneticists and genetic counsellors: its added value in genetic services in Europe.

Authors:  Milena Paneque; Clara Serra-Juhé; Rebecka Pestoff; Christophe Cordier; João Silva; Ramona Moldovan; Charlotta Ingvoldstad
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 4.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.