Literature DB >> 18596630

Doubt and belief in physicians' ability to prognosticate during critical illness: the perspective of surrogate decision makers.

Lucas S Zier1, Jeffrey H Burack, Guy Micco, Anne K Chipman, James A Frank, John M Luce, Douglas B White.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Although discussing a prognosis is a duty of physicians caring for critically ill patients, little is known about surrogate decision-makers' beliefs about physicians' ability to prognosticate. We sought to determine: 1) surrogates' beliefs about whether physicians can accurately prognosticate for critically ill patients; and 2) how individuals use prognostic information in their role as surrogate decision-makers. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Multicenter study in intensive care units of a public hospital, a tertiary care hospital, and a veterans' hospital. We conducted semistructured interviews with 50 surrogate decision-makers of critically ill patients. We analyzed the interview transcripts using grounded theory methods to inductively develop a framework to describe surrogates' beliefs about physicians' ability to prognosticate. Validation methods included triangulation by multidisciplinary analysis and member checking.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Overall, 88% (44 of 50) of surrogates expressed doubt about physicians' ability to prognosticate for critically ill patients. Four distinct themes emerged that explained surrogates' doubts about prognostic accuracy: a belief that God could alter the course of the illness, a belief that predicting the future is inherently uncertain, prior experiences where physicians' prognostications were inaccurate, and experiences with prognostication during the patient's intensive care unit stay. Participants also identified several factors that led to belief in physicians' prognostications, such as receiving similar prognostic estimates from multiple physicians and prior experiences with accurate prognostication. Surrogates' doubts about prognostic accuracy did not prevent them from wanting prognostic information. Instead, most surrogate decision-makers view physicians' prognostications as rough estimates that are valuable in informing decisions, but are not determinative. Surrogates identified the act of prognostic disclosure as a key step in preparing emotionally and practically for the possibility that a patient may not survive.
CONCLUSIONS: Although many surrogate decision-makers harbor some doubt about the accuracy of physicians' prognostications, they highly value discussions about prognosis and use the information for multiple purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18596630      PMCID: PMC2628287          DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318180ddf9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  25 in total

Review 1.  What do we mean by partnership in making decisions about treatment?

Authors:  C Charles; T Whelan; A Gafni
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-18

2.  Simple tools for understanding risks: from innumeracy to insight.

Authors:  Gerd Gigerenzer; Adrian Edwards
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-09-27

3.  Communication of end-of-life decisions in European intensive care units.

Authors:  Simon Cohen; Charles Sprung; Peter Sjokvist; Anne Lippert; Bara Ricou; Mario Baras; Seppo Hovilehto; Paulo Maia; Dermot Phelan; Konrad Reinhart; Karl Werdan; Hans-Henrik Bulow; Tom Woodcock
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-07-22       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Families looking back: one year after discussion of withdrawal or withholding of life-sustaining support.

Authors:  K H Abbott; J G Sago; C M Breen; A P Abernethy; J A Tulsky
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Family perceptions of prognosis, silence, and the "suddenness" of death.

Authors:  Ann J Russ; Sharon R Kaufman
Journal:  Cult Med Psychiatry       Date:  2005-03

6.  What is wrong with end-of-life care? Opinions of bereaved family members.

Authors:  L C Hanson; M Danis; J Garrett
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  Psychiatric disorders among bereaved persons: the role of perceived circumstances of death and preparedness for death.

Authors:  Lisa C Barry; Stanislav V Kasl; Holly G Prigerson
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.105

8.  Use of intensive care at the end of life in the United States: an epidemiologic study.

Authors:  Derek C Angus; Amber E Barnato; Walter T Linde-Zwirble; Lisa A Weissfeld; R Scott Watson; Tim Rickert; Gordon D Rubenfeld
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Impact of a proactive approach to improve end-of-life care in a medical ICU.

Authors:  Margaret L Campbell; Jorge A Guzman
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Effect of ethics consultations on nonbeneficial life-sustaining treatments in the intensive care setting: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Lawrence J Schneiderman; Todd Gilmer; Holly D Teetzel; Daniel O Dugan; Jeffrey Blustein; Ronald Cranford; Kathleen B Briggs; Glen I Komatsu; Paula Goodman-Crews; Felicia Cohn; Ernlé W D Young
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-09-03       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  42 in total

1.  A randomized trial of two methods to disclose prognosis to surrogate decision makers in intensive care units.

Authors:  Susan J Lee Char; Leah R Evans; Grace L Malvar; Douglas B White
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 21.405

2.  Do-not-hospitalize orders for individuals with advanced dementia: healthcare proxies' perspectives.

Authors:  Elizabeth Mann; Sarah L Goff; Wanda Colon-Cartagena; Sandra Bellantonio; Michael B Rothberg
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 3.  Communicating Uncertainty: a Narrative Review and Framework for Future Research.

Authors:  Arabella L Simpkin; Katrina A Armstrong
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  How clinicians discuss critically ill patients' preferences and values with surrogates: an empirical analysis.

Authors:  Leslie P Scheunemann; Thomas V Cunningham; Robert M Arnold; Praewpannarai Buddadhumaruk; Douglas B White
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Numeracy and Interpretation of Prognostic Estimates in Intracerebral Hemorrhage Among Surrogate Decision Makers in the Neurologic ICU.

Authors:  Nikita Leiter; Melissa Motta; Robert M Reed; Temitope Adeyeye; Debra L Wiegand; Nirav G Shah; Avelino C Verceles; Giora Netzer
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  Patient and family members' perceptions of palliative care in heart failure.

Authors:  Maureen Metzger; Sally A Norton; Jill R Quinn; Robert Gramling
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 2.210

7.  Institutional futility policies are inherently unfair.

Authors:  Philip M Rosoff
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2013-09

Review 8.  Clinical nihilism in neuroemergencies.

Authors:  J Claude Hemphill; Douglas B White
Journal:  Emerg Med Clin North Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.264

9.  Relationship between the prognostic expectations of seriously ill patients undergoing hemodialysis and their nephrologists.

Authors:  Melissa W Wachterman; Edward R Marcantonio; Roger B Davis; Robert A Cohen; Sushrut S Waikar; Russell S Phillips; Ellen P McCarthy
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 21.873

10.  A simple clinical predictive index for objective estimates of mortality in acute lung injury.

Authors:  Colin R Cooke; Chirag V Shah; Robert Gallop; Scarlett Bellamy; Marek Ancukiewicz; Mark D Eisner; Paul N Lanken; A Russell Localio; Jason D Christie
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 7.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.