Literature DB >> 9659136

Evaluation of peripheral dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: comparison with single photon absorptiometry of the forearm and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the spine or femur.

P A Mole1, M E McMurdo, C R Paterson.   

Abstract

An evaluation of the Osteoscan peripheral dual energy X-ray absorptiometer (pDXA) was carried out to compare its performance with those of a single photon absorptiometer (SPA) (Molsgaard Medical ND1100A) and a dual energy X-ray absorptiometer (DXA) (Lunar DPX alpha) of the spine or femur. In 57 patients, correlation between bone mineral content (BMC) of the forearm at the ultradistal (UD) site by pDXA and by SPA was high (r = 0.94). Comparisons were also made with spine and femur bone mineral density (BMD) DXA measurements. The correlation of z-scores of UD BMD with z-scores for lumbar spine L2-L4 was r = 0.63 (n = 73 patients); and with z-scores for neck of femur was r = 0.72 (n = 33). With the Osteoscan the measurement error coefficient of variation in vivo was 2.6% for BMC, 1.8% for BMD at the ultradistal site; 2.1% for BMC and 1.9% for BMD at the mid-distal site. Repeat measurements were made of the European forearm phantom; precision for SPA was slightly better than either pDXA or Lunar DXA. The Osteoscan has the potential for a rapid throughput of patients and is not affected by calcification and degenerative changes that can corrupt DXA measurements on the anteroposterior spine in older women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9659136     DOI: 10.1259/bjr.71.844.9659136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  4 in total

1.  Five-year follow-up study of a kidney-tonifying herbal Fufang for prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis and fragility fractures.

Authors:  Wei-Min Deng; Peng Zhang; Hai Huang; You-Gao Shen; Qin-Hua Yang; Wei-Li Cui; Yang-Shu He; Song Wei; Zhu Ye; Fang Liu; Ling Qin
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Differences in precision in bone mineral density measured by SXA and DXA: the NOREPOS study.

Authors:  Lisa Forsén; Gro K Rosvold Berntsen; Haakon E Meyer; Grethe S Tell; Vinjar Fønnebø
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Bone loss. Quantitative imaging techniques for assessing bone mass in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  C F Njeh; H K Genant
Journal:  Arthritis Res       Date:  2000-08-03

4.  Preoperative measures of bone mineral density from digital wrist radiographs.

Authors:  Greg Robertson; Robert Wallace; A Hamish R W Simpson; Sarah P Dawson
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 5.853

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.