Literature DB >> 18594757

Influence of mesh materials on the integrity of the vas deferens following Lichtenstein hernioplasty: an experimental model.

K Junge1, M Binnebösel, R Rosch, A Ottinger, M Stumpf, G Mühlenbruch, V Schumpelick, U Klinge.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The utilization of mesh reinforcement of the inguinal area with polypropylene mesh has increased drastically over the last decade. Infertility due to obstructive azoospermia is a rare but serious complication following inguinal hernia repair, especially in young patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different mesh structures on integrity of the vas deferens.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty male Chinchilla rabbits were used. The spermatic cord was dissected free and a Lichtenstein repair was performed with a low-weight polypropylene mesh (UltraPro) and a heavy-weight polypropylene mesh (Prolene) on the contralateral side. A vasography was performed after six months in order to investigate obstructions of the vas deferens. Light microscopy of the mesh host tissue interface was also performed and the foreign body reaction analyzed. Spermatogenesis was evaluated using the Johnsen score.
RESULTS: Vasography revealed relevant obstructions (>75% of lumen diameter) located at the mesh margins (50% of Prolene and 22.2% of UltraPro mesh samples). Microscopic investigation of the mesh-host tissue interface showed typical formation of foreign body granulomas. The diameters of the foreign body granulomas were significantly reduced in the UltraPro mesh group (41.7 +/- 5.5 microm) compared to the Prolene mesh group (48.7 +/- 7.7 microm). Upon investigating the percentages of apoptotic (TUNEL) and proliferating (Ki67) cells, no significant differences were found. Following Prolene mesh implantation, a mean Johnsen score of 9.1 +/- 1.2 was estimated, which was not significantly different from the UltraPro mesh samples (8.9 +/- 1.4, P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: If a mesh material is needed for inguinal hernia repair in young patients, the use of modern low-weight large porous and elastic samples appears to have a beneficial effect on integrity of the vas deferens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18594757     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-008-0400-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  17 in total

1.  Comparative study of inflammatory response and adhesions formation after fixation of different meshes for inguinal hernia repair in rabbits.

Authors:  Alberto Goldenberg; Jacques Matone; Wagner Marcondes; Fernando Augusto Mardiros Herbella; José Francisco de Mattos Farah
Journal:  Acta Cir Bras       Date:  2005-09-05       Impact factor: 1.388

2.  Testicular biopsy score count--a method for registration of spermatogenesis in human testes: normal values and results in 335 hypogonadal males.

Authors:  S G Johnsen
Journal:  Hormones       Date:  1970

3.  Herniorrhaphy with polypropylene mesh causing inguinal vasal obstruction: a preventable cause of obstructive azoospermia.

Authors:  David Shin; Larry I Lipshultz; Marc Goldstein; Gregory A Barmé; Eugene F Fuchs; Harris M Nagler; Stewart W McCallum; Craig S Niederberger; Richard A Schoor; Victor M Brugh; Stanton C Honig
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Functional and morphologic properties of a modified mesh for inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  Karsten Junge; Uwe Klinge; Raphael Rosch; Bernd Klosterhalfen; Volker Schumpelick
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2002-09-26       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  The influence of inguinal mesh repair on the spermatic cord: a pilot study in the rabbit.

Authors:  Christian Peiper; Karsten Junge; Uwe Klinge; Eva Strehlau; Carsten Krones; A Ottinger; Volker Schumpelick
Journal:  J Invest Surg       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.533

6.  Impact of polypropylene amount on functional outcome and quality of life after inguinal hernia repair by the TAPP procedure using pure, mixed, and titanium-coated meshes.

Authors:  Ruediger Horstmann; Matthias Hellwig; Claus Classen; Susanne Röttgermann; Daniel Palmes
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Randomized clinical trial assessing impact of a lightweight or heavyweight mesh on chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  P J O'Dwyer; A N Kingsnorth; R G Molloy; P K Small; B Lammers; G Horeyseck
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Modified mesh for hernia repair that is adapted to the physiology of the abdominal wall.

Authors:  U Klinge; B Klosterhalfen; J Conze; W Limberg; B Obolenski; A P Ottinger; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1998-12

9.  Demographic, classificatory, and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States.

Authors:  I M Rutkow; A W Robbins
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.741

10.  Functional and morphological evaluation of different polypropylene-mesh modifications for abdominal wall repair.

Authors:  B Klosterhalfen; U Klinge; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 12.479

View more
  17 in total

1.  Damage to the spermatic cord by the Lichtenstein and TAPP procedures in a pig model.

Authors:  Karsten Junge; Marcel Binnebösel; Caroline Kauffmann; Raphael Rosch; Christian Klink; Klaus von Trotha; Felix Schoth; Volker Schumpelick; Uwe Klinge
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Bioabsorbable Gore BIO-A plug and patch hernia repair in young adults.

Authors:  P Negro; F Gossetti; M R Dassatti; J Andreuccetti; L D'Amore
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 3.  Physical deformities relevant to male infertility.

Authors:  Rajender Singh; Alaa J Hamada; Laura Bukavina; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Bilateral endoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair does not induce obstructive azoospermia: data of a retrospective and prospective trial.

Authors:  S Skawran; D Weyhe; B Schmitz; O Belyaev; K H Bauer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Current options in inguinal hernia repair in adult patients.

Authors:  H Kulacoglu
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 0.471

6.  The effects of polypropylene mesh on femoral artery and femoral vein in mesh repair.

Authors:  M Sulaimanov; V Genc; A Cakmak; E Orozakunov; S Akkus; S Hazinedaroglu; E Kuterdem
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2010-09-12       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 7.  [Hernia surgery: minimization of complications by selection of the "correct mesh"].

Authors:  U Klinge; D Weyhe
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 0.955

8.  Litigation following groin hernia repair in England.

Authors:  B Alkhaffaf; B Decadt
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  Lower reoperation rates with the use of fibrin sealant versus tacks for mesh fixation.

Authors:  Neel Maria Helvind; Kristoffer Andresen; Jacob Rosenberg
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Antisperm antibodies and testicular blood flow after inguinal hernia mesh repair.

Authors:  Ivana Štula; Nikica Družijanić; Ada Sapunar; Zdravko Perko; Nada Bošnjak; Damir Kraljević
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.