Literature DB >> 20012456

Litigation following groin hernia repair in England.

B Alkhaffaf1, B Decadt.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Since 1995, litigation following surgical procedures has cost the National Health Service (NHS) over 1.3 billion GBP (Great British Pounds)/2.1 billion USD (United States Dollars)/1.4 billion Euros. Despite it being the most commonly undertaken general surgical operation, no study has examined clinical negligence claims in England following groin hernia repairs.
METHODS: Data from the NHS Litigation Authority of all claims made from 1995 to 2009 was obtained and interrogated.
RESULTS: In total, 398 claims were made. Of these, 209 cases had been settled, of which 144 (46.6%) were in favour of the claimant to a cost of 7.35 million GBP/12 million USD/7.93 million Euros. Testicular injury and chronic pain featured in 40% of all claims. Visceral injuries and injuries requiring corrective procedures were the only predictors of a successful claim (P = 0.015 and P = 0.002, respectively). Claims associated with visceral and vascular injuries were more likely to occur in laparoscopic than in open repairs. Sexual dysfunction and chronic pain resulted in the highest average payouts of 85,467 GBP/140,565 USD/92,177 Euros and 81,288 GBP/133,693 USD/87,674 Euros, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Patients should be fully informed of the incidence of testicular injury and chronic pain during the consent process. Approaches minimising visceral and vascular injury particularly in laparoscopic repair should be adopted to reduce litigation and improve patient care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20012456     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-009-0595-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  26 in total

Review 1.  Male genital tract injuries after contemporary inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  P F Ridgway; J Shah; A W Darzi
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Risk management observations from litigation involving laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Thomas R McLean
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2006-07

3.  Prevention of ischemic orchitis during inguinal hernioplasty.

Authors:  Y Fong; G E Wantz
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1992-05

4.  Physician-patient communication. The relationship with malpractice claims among primary care physicians and surgeons.

Authors:  W Levinson; D L Roter; J P Mullooly; V T Dull; R M Frankel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-02-19       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Microsurgical repair of iatrogenic injury to the vas deferens.

Authors:  Y R Sheynkin; B N Hendin; P N Schlegel; M Goldstein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Cooperative hernia study. Pain in the postrepair patient.

Authors:  J Cunningham; W J Temple; P Mitchell; J A Nixon; R M Preshaw; N A Hagen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Chronic pain after open mesh and sutured repair of indirect inguinal hernia in young males.

Authors:  M Bay-Nielsen; E Nilsson; P Nordin; H Kehlet
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Influence of mesh materials on the integrity of the vas deferens following Lichtenstein hernioplasty: an experimental model.

Authors:  K Junge; M Binnebösel; R Rosch; A Ottinger; M Stumpf; G Mühlenbruch; V Schumpelick; U Klinge
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  Physician scores on a national clinical skills examination as predictors of complaints to medical regulatory authorities.

Authors:  Robyn Tamblyn; Michal Abrahamowicz; Dale Dauphinee; Elizabeth Wenghofer; André Jacques; Daniel Klass; Sydney Smee; David Blackmore; Nancy Winslade; Nadyne Girard; Roxane Du Berger; Ilona Bartman; David L Buckeridge; James A Hanley
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Why do people sue doctors? A study of patients and relatives taking legal action.

Authors:  C Vincent; M Young; A Phillips
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-06-25       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  7 in total

1.  Pre-made consent for elective inguinal hernia repair: the need for standardisation-a survey of all UK NHS Trusts.

Authors:  M J Courtney; T J Royle
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Patient perception of laparoscopic versus open mesh repair of inguinal hernia, the hard sell.

Authors:  M Patel; G Garcea; K Fairhurst; A R Dennison
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  NICE guidance and current practise of recurrent and bilateral groin hernia repair by Scottish surgeons.

Authors:  I Shaikh; B Olabi; V M Y Wong; S J Nixon; S Kumar
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2011-02-05       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Chronic groin pain following open inguinal hernia repair: has consenting practice improved?

Authors:  V Sivarajah; Bjm Farquharson; S Mahdi; P Cathcart; S Jeyarajah
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 5.  Comparison of Porcine Small Intestinal Submucosa versus Polypropylene in Open Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xin Nie; Dongdong Xiao; Wenyue Wang; Zhicheng Song; Zhi Yang; Yuanwen Chen; Yan Gu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Patient's views of the consent process for groin hernia repair: Use of consent template improves compliance with best practice (Original research).

Authors:  Saad U Khan; David J Bowrey; Robert N Williams; Jun Yi Soh; Aikaterini Peleki; Nazli Muhibullah; Peter W Waterland
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2018-09-25

7.  Litigation claims following laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repairs.

Authors:  R Varley; C Lo; B Alkhaffaf
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 4.739

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.