Literature DB >> 10525892

Comparative reject analysis in conventional film-screen and digital storage phosphor radiography.

S Peer1, R Peer, M Walcher, M Pohl, W Jaschke.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was comparative analysis of rejected radiographs in conventional and digital radiology under the aspects number of rejected images and reasons for rejection. During 2 months waste films of conventional radiography were collected; in digital radiography each image-delete command at the postprocessing workstation was documented. Rejected images were analysed and assigned to four categories. The overall reject rate was 27.6% in the conventional and 2.3% in the digital department. Whereas in the conventional department the main reason for rejection was "exposure" and "others" (i.e. problems related to film handling), the main reason in the digital environment was "positioning". The high exposure tolerance of digital systems markedly reduces the amount of faulty images. This is not only economically rewarding, but may also reduce unnecessary X-ray exposure of patients due to image retake.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10525892     DOI: 10.1007/s003300050911

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  8 in total

1.  Digital repeat analysis; setup and operation.

Authors:  J Nol; G Isouard; J Mirecki
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Image retake analysis in digital radiography using DICOM header information.

Authors:  C Prieto; E Vano; J I Ten; J M Fernandez; A I Iñiguez; N Arevalo; A Litcheva; E Crespo; A Floriano; D Martinez
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Managing repeat digital radiography images-a systematic approach and improvement.

Authors:  Wen-Sheng Tzeng; Kuang-Ming Kuo; Chung-Feng Liu; Huan-Chung Yao; Chin-Yu Chen; Huang-Wei Lin
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  One year's results from a server-based system for performing reject analysis and exposure analysis in computed radiography.

Authors:  A Kyle Jones; Raimund Polman; Charles E Willis; S Jeff Shepard
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Clinical utility of ultra-low-dose pre-test exposure to avoid unnecessary patient exposure due to positioning errors: a simulation study.

Authors:  Hideo Nose; Junji Shiraishi
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2017-09-11

Review 6.  Patient-based radiographic exposure factor selection: a systematic review.

Authors:  William Ching; John Robinson; Mark McEntee
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2014-08-07

7.  Image rejects in general direct digital radiography.

Authors:  Bjørn Hofmann; Tine Blomberg Rosanowsky; Camilla Jensen; Kenneth Hong Ching Wah
Journal:  Acta Radiol Open       Date:  2015-10-08

8.  Repeat analysis of intraoral digital imaging performed by undergraduate students using a complementary metal oxide semiconductor sensor: An institutional case study.

Authors:  Mohd Yusmiaidil Putera Mohd Yusof; Nur Liyana Abdul Rahman; Amiza Aqiela Ahmad Asri; Noor Ilyani Othman; Ilham Wan Mokhtar
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2017-12-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.