PURPOSE: To compare the initial biomechanical properties of zone I flexor tendon to bone repairs performed using pull-out and anchor techniques and to investigate the effect of bone quality and suture materials on the strength of anchor repairs. METHODS: Using computed tomography, we measured bone mineral density and cortical thickness of the distal phalanx of 60 cadaver fingers (mean age, 77 years). Flexor digitorum profundus tendons were then transected at their insertion sites and repaired using a 4-strand grasping suture and either pull-out or anchor fixation. For pull-out repair (n = 20), the suture strands (Supramid 3-0; S. Jackson, Inc., Alexandria, VA) were passed through the distal phalanx and tied over a dorsal button. For anchor repair, 2 bone anchors were inserted into the distal phalanx, and tendons were grasped using either Supramid (n = 21), Ethibond (Ethicon, Inc., Somerville, NJ; n = 10), or FiberWire suture (Arthrex Inc., Naples, FL; n = 9) (all 3-0). Mechanical properties of the repaired tendon-bone constructs were determined in linear, load-to-failure loading and correlated with bone characteristics. RESULTS: The FiberWire-anchor repair group had the best combination of mechanical properties, with ultimate force to failure no different from the pull-out repairs but with greater stiffness and reduced displacement. Pull-out suture repairs had significantly higher ultimate force-to-failure values than did Ethibond-anchor and Supramid-anchor repairs (p < .01). However, pull-out repairs had significantly reduced stiffness and greater displacement at 20 N force than did anchor repairs from all groups (p < .05). Both bone mineral density and cortical thickness correlated significantly with ultimate force (p < .01). Almost all anchors pulled out for bone mineral density below 420 mg/cm(3) or cortical thickness less than 0.31 mm, which occurred only for specimens aged greater than 75 years. CONCLUSIONS: The mechanical properties of the double Mitek bone anchors were sensitive to both suture material and bone quality. FiberWire-anchor repairs provided the best combination of mechanical properties. Pull-out suture repairs had good strength but poor stiffness. Anchor fixation may be contraindicated in patients greater than 75 years because of poor bone quality.
PURPOSE: To compare the initial biomechanical properties of zone I flexor tendon to bone repairs performed using pull-out and anchor techniques and to investigate the effect of bone quality and suture materials on the strength of anchor repairs. METHODS: Using computed tomography, we measured bone mineral density and cortical thickness of the distal phalanx of 60 cadaver fingers (mean age, 77 years). Flexor digitorum profundus tendons were then transected at their insertion sites and repaired using a 4-strand grasping suture and either pull-out or anchor fixation. For pull-out repair (n = 20), the suture strands (Supramid 3-0; S. Jackson, Inc., Alexandria, VA) were passed through the distal phalanx and tied over a dorsal button. For anchor repair, 2 bone anchors were inserted into the distal phalanx, and tendons were grasped using either Supramid (n = 21), Ethibond (Ethicon, Inc., Somerville, NJ; n = 10), or FiberWire suture (Arthrex Inc., Naples, FL; n = 9) (all 3-0). Mechanical properties of the repaired tendon-bone constructs were determined in linear, load-to-failure loading and correlated with bone characteristics. RESULTS: The FiberWire-anchor repair group had the best combination of mechanical properties, with ultimate force to failure no different from the pull-out repairs but with greater stiffness and reduced displacement. Pull-out suture repairs had significantly higher ultimate force-to-failure values than did Ethibond-anchor and Supramid-anchor repairs (p < .01). However, pull-out repairs had significantly reduced stiffness and greater displacement at 20 N force than did anchor repairs from all groups (p < .05). Both bone mineral density and cortical thickness correlated significantly with ultimate force (p < .01). Almost all anchors pulled out for bone mineral density below 420 mg/cm(3) or cortical thickness less than 0.31 mm, which occurred only for specimens aged greater than 75 years. CONCLUSIONS: The mechanical properties of the double Mitek bone anchors were sensitive to both suture material and bone quality. FiberWire-anchor repairs provided the best combination of mechanical properties. Pull-out suture repairs had good strength but poor stiffness. Anchor fixation may be contraindicated in patients greater than 75 years because of poor bone quality.
Authors: Martin I Boyer; Konstantinos Ditsios; Richard H Gelberman; Fraser Leversedge; Matthew Silva Journal: J Hand Surg Am Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 2.230
Authors: Markus J Tingart; Maria Apreleva; Janne Lehtinen; David Zurakowski; Jon J P Warner Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2004-07-20 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Jerrod J Felder; Loredana M Guseila; Archana Saranathan; Timothy J Shary; Steven B Lippitt; John J Elias Journal: J Hand Microsurg Date: 2013-06-02
Authors: Chunfeng Zhao; Yu-Long Sun; Jun Ikeda; Ramona L Kirk; Andrew R Thoreson; Steven L Moran; Kai-Nan An; Peter C Amadio Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2010-12-01 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Christopher M Yakacki; Mariya Poukalova; Robert E Guldberg; Angela Lin; Minn Saing; Scott Gillogly; Ken Gall Journal: J Biomech Date: 2010-04-18 Impact factor: 2.712