Literature DB >> 22009214

[Diagnostics and therapy of localized prostate cancer: a problem-oriented account].

C Weber1.   

Abstract

The diagnostics and treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) are currently encumbered with several problems: Only a small proportion of men attend medical check-ups. The PSA count, although invaluable in the early detection of PCa, is not being paid for by health insurance schemes, because its indiscriminate use would result in overdiagnosis of PCa which, in turn would burden patients with avoidable morbidity and the mutually supportive community with unnecessary costs. Accordingly, some clinically insignificant tumors are being detected and treated although treatment appears unnecessary. However, more importantly too many significant tumors which need early detection to be cured are being discovered too late due to diagnostic possibilities being neglected. At least one third of all tumors discovered are still found at a locally advanced stage. Following diagnosis by biopsy the therapeutic recommendations are guided by the clinical stage. In spite of recent advances in MR-based imaging the exact local extent of tumors remains uncertain. Prognostic and predictive biomarkers for aid in therapeutic decisions are also lacking. The more defensive therapeutic strategies, such as active surveillance should be recommended with special precautions in patients younger than 65 years, in the light of new Scandinavian data. Among the curative treatments radical prostatectomy claims the primary position. Minimally-invasive surgery for PCa has not come up to expectations regarding superior local tumor control, less perioperative complication, or better functional results, at the expense of appreciably higher costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22009214     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-011-2181-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  24 in total

1.  Longitudinal PSA changes in men with and without prostate cancer: assessment of prostate cancer risk.

Authors:  Andreas P Berger; Martina Deibl; Hannes Steiner; Jasmin Bektic; Alexandre Pelzer; Robert Spranger; Helmut Klocker; Georg Bartsch; Wolfgang Horninger
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2005-08-01       Impact factor: 4.104

2.  High grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and prostatic adenocarcinoma between the ages of 20-69: an autopsy study of 249 cases.

Authors:  W A Sakr; D J Grignon; J D Crissman; L K Heilbrun; B J Cassin; J J Pontes; G P Haas
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  A model for the number of cores per prostate biopsy based on patient age and prostate gland volume.

Authors:  A R Vashi; K J Wojno; B Gillespie; J E Oesterling
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 4.  Prostate biopsy: who, how and when. An update.

Authors:  Bob Djavan; Shirin Milani; Mesut Remzi
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.344

5.  [Optimized standards for prostate biopsy].

Authors:  B Wullich; S Füssel; R Grobholz
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial.

Authors:  Gerald L Andriole; E David Crawford; Robert L Grubb; Saundra S Buys; David Chia; Timothy R Church; Mona N Fouad; Edward P Gelmann; Paul A Kvale; Douglas J Reding; Joel L Weissfeld; Lance A Yokochi; Barbara O'Brien; Jonathan D Clapp; Joshua M Rathmell; Thomas L Riley; Richard B Hayes; Barnett S Kramer; Grant Izmirlian; Anthony B Miller; Paul F Pinsky; Philip C Prorok; John K Gohagan; Christine D Berg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Effects of pathologic stage on the learning curve for radical prostatectomy: evidence that recurrence in organ-confined cancer is largely related to inadequate surgical technique.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Fernando J Bianco; Mithat Gonen; Angel M Cronin; James A Eastham; Deborah Schrag; Eric A Klein; Alwyn M Reuther; Michael W Kattan; J Edson Pontes; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jim C Hu; Xiangmei Gu; Stuart R Lipsitz; Michael J Barry; Anthony V D'Amico; Aaron C Weinberg; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Natural history of early, localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jan-Erik Johansson; Ove Andrén; Swen-Olof Andersson; Paul W Dickman; Lars Holmberg; Anders Magnuson; Hans-Olov Adami
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-06-09       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Utilization and outcomes of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jim C Hu; Qin Wang; Chris L Pashos; Stuart R Lipsitz; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-05-10       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.