Literature DB >> 20683569

[Life without robots : What is left for the urologist?].

O Hakenberg1.   

Abstract

The triumphal march of robots in urology seems to be unstoppable. In the meantime, a broadening of the scope for indications in urology can be observed: this applies to pyeloplasty and to a lesser degree also to partial nephrectomy and radical cystectomy. As yet no evidence has been provided that robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RP) is superior to open surgery. Furthermore, data are available which suggest that the midterm functional results are possibly even worse than those achieved with open RP.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20683569     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-010-2302-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  10 in total

Review 1.  The current status of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Prokar Dasgupta; Roger S Kirby
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 2.  Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Giacomo Novara; Walter Artibani; Andrea Cestari; Antonio Galfano; Markus Graefen; Giorgio Guazzoni; Bertrand Guillonneau; Mani Menon; Francesco Montorsi; Vipul Patel; Jens Rassweiler; Hendrik Van Poppel
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-01-25       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Seduced by a robot.

Authors:  J Curtis Nickel
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  You can't resist the charms of the robot!

Authors:  Roger S Kirby
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  The robotic revolution: the seduction continues.

Authors:  J Curtis Nickel
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Operative details and oncological and functional outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 400 cases with a minimum of 12 months follow-up.

Authors:  Declan G Murphy; Michael Kerger; Helen Crowe; Justin S Peters; Anthony J Costello
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Satisfaction and regret after open retropubic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Florian R Schroeck; Tracey L Krupski; Leon Sun; David M Albala; Marva M Price; Thomas J Polascik; Cary N Robertson; Alok K Tewari; Judd W Moul
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-06-23       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jim C Hu; Xiangmei Gu; Stuart R Lipsitz; Michael J Barry; Anthony V D'Amico; Aaron C Weinberg; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Utilization and outcomes of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jim C Hu; Qin Wang; Chris L Pashos; Stuart R Lipsitz; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-05-10       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Variations in surgeon volume and use of pelvic lymph node dissection with open and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Sandip M Prasad; Nancy L Keating; Qin Wang; Chris L Pashos; Stuart Lipsitz; Jerome P Richie; Jim C Hu
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 2.649

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  [Pyeloplasty: pro laparoscopic].

Authors:  P Bader
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 0.639

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.