Literature DB >> 20480134

[Biomechanics of interspinous spacers].

H-J Wilke1, J Drumm, K Häussler, C Mack, A Kettler.   

Abstract

Interspinous spacers are commonly used to treat lumbar spinal stenosis or facet joint arthritis. The aims of implanting interspinous devices are to unload the facet joints, restore foraminal height, and provide stability especially in extension but still allow motion. This paper summarizes several in vitro studies, which compared four different interspinous implants - Coflex, Wallis, DIAM, and X-STOP - in terms of their three-dimensional primary stability, the intradiscal pressure, and stability after cyclic loading. 24 human lumbar spine specimens were divided into four equal groups and tested with pure moments in flexion/extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation: intact, after decompression with hemifacetectomy, and after implantation. Implantation had similar biomechanical effects with all four implants. In extension, they overcompensated the instability caused by the defect and restricted extension to about 50% compared to the intact state. In contrast, in flexion, lateral bending, and axial rotation the values of the range of motion stayed similar compared to the defective state. Intradiscal pressure after implantation was similar to that of the intact specimens in flexion, lateral bending, and axial rotation but much smaller during extension; 50,000 load cycles increased the range of motion in all motion planes by no more than 20%, but in extension motion this was still less than in the intact state.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20480134     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-009-1587-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  23 in total

1.  The effects of an interspinous implant on intervertebral disc pressures.

Authors:  Kyle E Swanson; Derek P Lindsey; Ken Y Hsu; James F Zucherman; Scott A Yerby
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Effect of an interspinous implant on loads in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  A Rohlmann; T Zander; N K Burra; G Bergmann
Journal:  Biomed Tech (Berl)       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.411

3.  Lumbar spinal stenosis: conservative or surgical management?: A prospective 10-year study.

Authors:  T Amundsen; H Weber; H J Nordal; B Magnaes; M Abdelnoor; F Lilleâs
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Testing criteria for spinal implants: recommendations for the standardization of in vitro stability testing of spinal implants.

Authors:  H J Wilke; K Wenger; L Claes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Preliminary design and experimental studies of a novel soft implant for correcting sagittal plane instability in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  R J Minns; W K Walsh
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis. Clinical and outcome results and a 3-year survivorship analysis.

Authors:  A C Simotas; F J Dorey; K K Hansraj; F Cammisa
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  A universal spine tester for in vitro experiments with muscle force simulation.

Authors:  H J Wilke; L Claes; H Schmitt; S Wolf
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Biomechanics of posterior dynamic stabilizing device (DIAM) after facetectomy and discectomy.

Authors:  Frank M Phillips; Leonard I Voronov; Ioannis N Gaitanis; Gerard Carandang; Robert M Havey; Avinash G Patwardhan
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 9.  Determination of the in vivo posterior loading environment of the Coflex interlaminar-interspinous implant.

Authors:  Frank T Trautwein; Gary L Lowery; Nicholas D Wharton; John A Hipp; Robert J Chomiak
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 4.166

10.  The effects of an interspinous implant on the kinematics of the instrumented and adjacent levels in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Derek P Lindsey; Kyle E Swanson; Paul Fuchs; Ken Y Hsu; James F Zucherman; Scott A Yerby
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.