Literature DB >> 18584164

Muscle cocontraction following dynamics learning.

Mohammad Darainy1, David J Ostry.   

Abstract

Coactivation of antagonist muscles is readily observed early in motor learning, in interactions with unstable mechanical environments and in motor system pathologies. Here we present evidence that the nervous system uses coactivation control far more extensively and that patterns of cocontraction during movement are closely tied to the specific requirements of the task. We have examined the changes in cocontraction that follow dynamics learning in tasks that are thought to involve finely sculpted feedforward adjustments to motor commands. We find that, even following substantial training, cocontraction varies in a systematic way that depends on both movement direction and the strength of the external load. The proportion of total activity that is due to cocontraction nevertheless remains remarkably constant. Moreover, long after indices of motor learning and electromyographic measures have reached asymptotic levels, cocontraction still accounts for a significant proportion of total muscle activity in all phases of movement and in all load conditions. These results show that even following dynamics learning in predictable and stable environments, cocontraction forms a central part of the means by which the nervous system regulates movement.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18584164     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1457-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  16 in total

1.  Relationship between cocontraction, movement kinematics and phasic muscle activity in single-joint arm movement.

Authors:  M Suzuki; D M Shiller; P L Gribble; D J Ostry
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Role of cocontraction in arm movement accuracy.

Authors:  Paul L Gribble; Lucy I Mullin; Nicholas Cothros; Andrew Mattar
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-01-22       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Functional significance of stiffness in adaptation of multijoint arm movements to stable and unstable dynamics.

Authors:  David W Franklin; Etienne Burdet; Rieko Osu; Mitsuo Kawato; Theodore E Milner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-29       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Failure to consolidate the consolidation theory of learning for sensorimotor adaptation tasks.

Authors:  Graham Caithness; Rieko Osu; Paul Bays; Henry Chase; Jessica Klassen; Mitsuo Kawato; Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-10-06       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Adaptation to stable and unstable dynamics achieved by combined impedance control and inverse dynamics model.

Authors:  David W Franklin; Rieko Osu; Etienne Burdet; Mitsuo Kawato; Theodore E Milner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Independent coactivation of shoulder and elbow muscles.

Authors:  P L Gribble; D J Ostry
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The central nervous system stabilizes unstable dynamics by learning optimal impedance.

Authors:  E Burdet; R Osu; D W Franklin; T E Milner; M Kawato
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-11-22       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Compensation for mechanically unstable loading in voluntary wrist movement.

Authors:  T E Milner; C Cloutier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Electromyographic correlates of learning an internal model of reaching movements.

Authors:  K A Thoroughman; R Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  A gain-field encoding of limb position and velocity in the internal model of arm dynamics.

Authors:  Eun Jung Hwang; Opher Donchin; Maurice A Smith; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2003-11-17       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  28 in total

1.  Changes in muscle directional tuning parallel feedforward adaptation to a visuomotor rotation.

Authors:  Aymar de Rugy; Timothy J Carroll
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Evidence for repetitive load in the trapezius muscle during a tapping task.

Authors:  L Tomatis; C Müller; M Nakaseko; T Läubli
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Reduction of metabolic cost during motor learning of arm reaching dynamics.

Authors:  Helen J Huang; Rodger Kram; Alaa A Ahmed
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Long-term adaptations differ for shortening and lengthening contractions.

Authors:  Osmar Pinto Neto; Hillary Lindheim; Ana Carolina de Miranda Marzullo; Harsimran S Baweja; Evangelos A Christou
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Effects of human arm impedance on dynamics learning and generalization.

Authors:  Mohammad Darainy; Andrew A G Mattar; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Older adults learn less, but still reduce metabolic cost, during motor adaptation.

Authors:  Helen J Huang; Alaa A Ahmed
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Optimizing effort: increased efficiency of motor memory with time away from practice.

Authors:  Sarah E Pekny; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Sensorimotor adaptation changes the neural coding of somatosensory stimuli.

Authors:  Sazzad M Nasir; Mohammad Darainy; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Does load uncertainty affect adaptation to catch training?

Authors:  William P Berg; Brian J Richards; Aaron M Hannigan; Kelsey L Biller; Michael R Hughes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Trial-to-trial adaptation in control of arm reaching and standing posture.

Authors:  Alison Pienciak-Siewert; Dylan P Horan; Alaa A Ahmed
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.