Literature DB >> 27215774

Does load uncertainty affect adaptation to catch training?

William P Berg1, Brian J Richards2, Aaron M Hannigan3, Kelsey L Biller4, Michael R Hughes5.   

Abstract

Catching relies on anticipatory and compensatory control processes. Load uncertainty increases anticipatory and compensatory neuromotor effort in catching. This experiment tested the effect of load uncertainty in plyometric catch/throw training on elbow flexion reaction time (RT), movement time (MT) and peak torque, as well as the distribution of anticipatory and compensatory neuromotor effort in catching. We expected load uncertainty training to be superior to traditional training for improving elbow flexion MT and peak torque, as well as for reallocating neuromotor effort from compensatory to anticipatory control in catching. Three groups of men (mean age = 21), load knowledge training (K) (n = 14), load uncertainty training (U) (n = 13) and control (C) (n = 14), participated. Groups K and U trained three times/week for 6 weeks using single-arm catch/throw exercises with 0.45-4.08 kg balls. Sets involved 16 repetitions of four different ball masses presented randomly. Group K had knowledge of ball mass on every repetition, whereas group U never did. Change scores were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis tests and follow-up Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Group K improved both RT and MT (by 6.2 and 12 %, respectively), whereas group U did not. Both groups K and U improved peak eccentric elbow flexion torque. Group K reallocated neuromotor effort from compensatory to anticipatory processes in the biceps, triceps and the all muscle average, whereas group U did so in the triceps only. In sum, plyometric catch/throw training caused a reallocation of neuromotor effort from compensatory to anticipatory control in catching. However, load uncertainty training did not amplify this effect and in fact appeared to inhibit the reallocation of neuromotor effort from compensatory to anticipatory control.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anticipatory control; Catching; Compensatory control; Load knowledge; Load uncertainty; Plyometric training

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27215774     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-016-4664-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  22 in total

1.  Cerebellar subjects show impaired adaptation of anticipatory EMG during catching.

Authors:  C E Lang; A J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time.

Authors:  R HYMAN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1953-03

3.  The Effect of Load Uncertainty and Foreperiod Regularity on Anticipatory and Compensatory Neuromotor Control in Catching.

Authors:  William P Berg; Michael R Hughes
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 1.422

4.  Advance knowledge effects on kinematics of one-handed catching.

Authors:  Pieter Tijtgat; Simon J Bennett; Geert J P Savelsbergh; Dirk De Clercq; Matthieu Lenoir
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Improvement of anticipatory postural adjustments for balance control: effect of a single training session.

Authors:  Neeta Kanekar; Alexander S Aruin
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 2.368

6.  Postural coactivation and adaptation in the sway stabilizing responses of normals and patients with bilateral vestibular deficit.

Authors:  E A Keshner; J H Allum; C R Pfaltz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Adaptation to suppression of visual information during catching.

Authors:  F Lacquaniti; C Maioli
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  The role of preparation in tuning anticipatory and reflex responses during catching.

Authors:  F Lacquaniti; C Maioli
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Electromyographic correlates of learning an internal model of reaching movements.

Authors:  K A Thoroughman; R Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  The role of anticipatory postural adjustments in compensatory control of posture: 2. Biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  Marcio J Santos; Neeta Kanekar; Alexander S Aruin
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2010-02-13       Impact factor: 2.368

View more
  2 in total

1.  Does the sensorimotor system minimize prediction error or select the most likely prediction during object lifting?

Authors:  Joshua G A Cashaback; Heather R McGregor; Henry C H Pun; Gavin Buckingham; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Reduced plantar sole sensitivity facilitates early adaptation to a visual rotation pointing task when standing upright.

Authors:  Billot Maxime; Teasdale Normand; Gagné Lemieux Léandre; Germain Robitaille Mathieu; Simoneau Martin
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 2.193

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.