Literature DB >> 25355964

Optimizing effort: increased efficiency of motor memory with time away from practice.

Sarah E Pekny1, Reza Shadmehr2.   

Abstract

In motor tasks, efficiency can be measured via the commands that are produced to accomplish a goal. To maximize efficiency, the nervous system should produce task-relevant motor commands while avoiding behaviors that are task-irrelevant. The current view is that this is achieved through training, i.e., the optimum motor commands are learned by trial and error. However, in contrast to this view, there are numerous examples in which during an experiment, task-irrelevant commands are continuously produced. To address this, we trained human volunteers to reach in a force field. With practice, they learned to produce forces that compensated for the field, generating task-relevant commands that were necessary to achieve success. As expected, training also resulted in generalization, the transfer of learning to other movements. We designed the task so that any forces produced as a result of generalization were unnecessary and therefore task-irrelevant. Importantly, there were no explicit cues to indicate that production of these forces was task-irrelevant. Rather, the only indicator was effort itself. Could this inefficiency of the motor commands be reduced? We found that even with extensive practice, the production of task-irrelevant forces persisted. However, if subjects were given sufficient time away from practice (6 or 24 h but not 3 or 30 min), they spontaneously reduced production of the task-irrelevant forces. Therefore, practice alone was insufficient to allow for increased efficiency of motor output. Time away from practice was a required element for optimization of effort.
Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  generalization; long-term training; motor learning

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25355964      PMCID: PMC4297790          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00638.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  33 in total

1.  Generalization as a behavioral window to the neural mechanisms of learning internal models.

Authors:  Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.161

Review 2.  Sleep function and synaptic homeostasis.

Authors:  Giulio Tononi; Chiara Cirelli
Journal:  Sleep Med Rev       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 11.609

3.  Intermittent practice facilitates stable motor memories.

Authors:  Simon A Overduin; Andrew G Richardson; Courtney E Lane; Emilio Bizzi; Daniel Z Press
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Motor adaptation as a process of reoptimization.

Authors:  Jun Izawa; Tushar Rane; Opher Donchin; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Daytime sleep condenses the time course of motor memory consolidation.

Authors:  Maria Korman; Julien Doyon; Julia Doljansky; Julie Carrier; Yaron Dagan; Avi Karni
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-12       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Muscle cocontraction following dynamics learning.

Authors:  Mohammad Darainy; David J Ostry
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Electromyographic correlates of learning an internal model of reaching movements.

Authors:  K A Thoroughman; R Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Stably maintained dendritic spines are associated with lifelong memories.

Authors:  Guang Yang; Feng Pan; Wen-Biao Gan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-11-29       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Rapid formation and selective stabilization of synapses for enduring motor memories.

Authors:  Tonghui Xu; Xinzhu Yu; Andrew J Perlik; Willie F Tobin; Jonathan A Zweig; Kelly Tennant; Theresa Jones; Yi Zuo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-11-29       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Contribution of night and day sleep vs. simple passage of time to the consolidation of motor sequence and visuomotor adaptation learning.

Authors:  Julien Doyon; Maria Korman; Amélie Morin; Valérie Dostie; Abdallah Hadj Tahar; Habib Benali; Avi Karni; Leslie G Ungerleider; Julie Carrier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  9 in total

1.  Estimating properties of the fast and slow adaptive processes during sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  Scott T Albert; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Robot-assisted surgery: an emerging platform for human neuroscience research.

Authors:  Anthony M Jarc; Ilana Nisky
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Chunking as the result of an efficiency computation trade-off.

Authors:  Pavan Ramkumar; Daniel E Acuna; Max Berniker; Scott T Grafton; Robert S Turner; Konrad P Kording
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  The decay of motor adaptation to novel movement dynamics reveals an asymmetry in the stability of motion state-dependent learning.

Authors:  Eghbal A Hosseini; Katrina P Nguyen; Wilsaan M Joiner
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Adaptive coupling influences generalization of sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Mohsen Sadeghi; James N Ingram; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Effects of the amount of practice and time interval between practice sessions on the retention of internal models.

Authors:  Chiharu Yamada; Yoshihiro Itaguchi; Kazuyoshi Fukuzawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The decay and consolidation of effector-independent motor memories.

Authors:  Shancheng Bao; Jinsung Wang; David L Wright; John J Buchanan; Yuming Lei
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Selective improvements in balancing associated with offline periods of spaced training.

Authors:  Antonino Casabona; Maria Stella Valle; Carlo Cavallaro; Gabriele Castorina; Matteo Cioni
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Variable training but not sleep improves consolidation of motor adaptation.

Authors:  Benjamin Thürer; Frederik D Weber; Jan Born; Thorsten Stein
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.