Literature DB >> 29755979

Design and validation of diffusion MRI models of white matter.

Ileana O Jelescu1, Matthew D Budde2.   

Abstract

Diffusion MRI is arguably the method of choice for characterizing white matter microstructure in vivo. Over the typical duration of diffusion encoding, the displacement of water molecules is conveniently on a length scale similar to that of the underlying cellular structures. Moreover, water molecules in white matter are largely compartmentalized which enables biologically-inspired compartmental diffusion models to characterize and quantify the true biological microstructure. A plethora of white matter models have been proposed. However, overparameterization and mathematical fitting complications encourage the introduction of simplifying assumptions that vary between different approaches. These choices impact the quantitative estimation of model parameters with potential detriments to their biological accuracy and promised specificity. First, we review biophysical white matter models in use and recapitulate their underlying assumptions and realms of applicability. Second, we present up-to-date efforts to validate parameters estimated from biophysical models. Simulations and dedicated phantoms are useful in assessing the performance of models when the ground truth is known. However, the biggest challenge remains the validation of the "biological accuracy" of estimated parameters. Complementary techniques such as microscopy of fixed tissue specimens have facilitated direct comparisons of estimates of white matter fiber orientation and densities. However, validation of compartmental diffusivities remains challenging, and complementary MRI-based techniques such as alternative diffusion encodings, compartment-specific contrast agents and metabolites have been used to validate diffusion models. Finally, white matter injury and disease pose additional challenges to modeling, which are also discussed. This review aims to provide an overview of the current state of models and their validation and to stimulate further research in the field to solve the remaining open questions and converge towards consensus.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diffusion MRI; microstructure; modeling; tissue compartments; white matter

Year:  2017        PMID: 29755979      PMCID: PMC5947881          DOI: 10.3389/fphy.2017.00061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Phys        ISSN: 2296-424X


  175 in total

1.  Early detection of regional cerebral ischemia in cats: comparison of diffusion- and T2-weighted MRI and spectroscopy.

Authors:  M E Moseley; Y Cohen; J Mintorovitch; L Chileuitt; H Shimizu; J Kucharczyk; M F Wendland; P R Weinstein
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging of the healthy cervical spinal cord in vivo.

Authors:  Francesco Grussu; Torben Schneider; Hui Zhang; Daniel C Alexander; Claudia A M Wheeler-Kingshott
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Anisotropic diffusion of metabolites in peripheral nerve using diffusion weighted magnetic resonance spectroscopy at ultra-high field.

Authors:  Jacob Ellegood; Ryan T McKay; Chris C Hanstock; Christian Beaulieu
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 2.229

4.  Diffusion time dependence of microstructural parameters in fixed spinal cord.

Authors:  Sune Nørhøj Jespersen; Jonas Lynge Olesen; Brian Hansen; Noam Shemesh
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Stroke assessment with diffusional kurtosis imaging.

Authors:  Edward S Hui; Els Fieremans; Jens H Jensen; Ali Tabesh; Wuwei Feng; Leonardo Bonilha; Maria V Spampinato; Robert Adams; Joseph A Helpern
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Ultramicroscopy: three-dimensional visualization of neuronal networks in the whole mouse brain.

Authors:  Hans-Ulrich Dodt; Ulrich Leischner; Anja Schierloh; Nina Jährling; Christoph Peter Mauch; Katrin Deininger; Jan Michael Deussing; Matthias Eder; Walter Zieglgänsberger; Klaus Becker
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2007-03-25       Impact factor: 28.547

7.  Complex geometric models of diffusion and relaxation in healthy and damaged white matter.

Authors:  Bennett A Landman; Jonathan A D Farrell; Seth A Smith; Daniel S Reich; Peter A Calabresi; Peter C M van Zijl
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.044

8.  Comparison of 3D orientation distribution functions measured with confocal microscopy and diffusion MRI.

Authors:  Kurt Schilling; Vaibhav Janve; Yurui Gao; Iwona Stepniewska; Bennett A Landman; Adam W Anderson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Evaluation of extra- and intracellular apparent diffusion in normal and globally ischemic rat brain via 19F NMR.

Authors:  T Q Duong; J J Ackerman; H S Ying; J J Neil
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Clinical feasibility of using mean apparent propagator (MAP) MRI to characterize brain tissue microstructure.

Authors:  Alexandru V Avram; Joelle E Sarlls; Alan S Barnett; Evren Özarslan; Cibu Thomas; M Okan Irfanoglu; Elizabeth Hutchinson; Carlo Pierpaoli; Peter J Basser
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  60 in total

1.  Diffusion MRI microstructural models in the cervical spinal cord - Application, normative values, and correlations with histological analysis.

Authors:  Kurt G Schilling; Samantha By; Haley R Feiler; Bailey A Box; Kristin P O'Grady; Atlee Witt; Bennett A Landman; Seth A Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Histologically derived fiber response functions for diffusion MRI vary across white matter fibers-An ex vivo validation study in the squirrel monkey brain.

Authors:  Kurt G Schilling; Yurui Gao; Iwona Stepniewska; Vaibhav Janve; Bennett A Landman; Adam W Anderson
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 4.044

3.  Linking spherical mean diffusion weighted signal with intra-axonal volume fraction.

Authors:  Hua Li; Ho Ming Chow; Diane C Chugani; Harry T Chugani
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  Fingerprinting Orientation Distribution Functions in diffusion MRI detects smaller crossing angles.

Authors:  Steven H Baete; Martijn A Cloos; Ying-Chia Lin; Dimitris G Placantonakis; Timothy Shepherd; Fernando E Boada
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 5.  Physical and numerical phantoms for the validation of brain microstructural MRI: A cookbook.

Authors:  Els Fieremans; Hong-Hsi Lee
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 6.  Quantifying brain microstructure with diffusion MRI: Theory and parameter estimation.

Authors:  Dmitry S Novikov; Els Fieremans; Sune N Jespersen; Valerij G Kiselev
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 4.044

7.  Neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging can detect presymptomatic axonal degeneration in the spinal cord of ALS mice.

Authors:  R G Gatto; S M Mustafi; M Y Amin; T H Mareci; Yu-Chien Wu; R L Magin
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2018 Jul/Sept

8.  Effect of intravoxel incoherent motion on diffusion parameters in normal brain.

Authors:  Casey Vieni; Benjamin Ades-Aron; Bettina Conti; Eric E Sigmund; Peter Riviello; Timothy M Shepherd; Yvonne W Lui; Dmitry S Novikov; Els Fieremans
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Reproducibility of axonal water fraction derived from the spherical mean diffusion weighted signal.

Authors:  Jucai Song; Ho Ming Chow; Rahul Nikam; Vinay Kandula; Arabinda K Choudhary; Hua Li
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 10.  Diffusion MR imaging acquisition and analytics for microstructural delineation in pre-clinical models of TBI.

Authors:  N G Harris; A Paydar; G S Smith; S Lepore
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 4.164

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.