Literature DB >> 26430467

Does science need bioethicists? Ethics and science collaboration in biomedical research.

Angeliki Kerasidou1, Michael Parker1.   

Abstract

Biomedical research is an increasingly multidisciplinary activity bringing together a range of different academic fields and forms of expertise to investigate diseases that are increasingly understood to be complex and multifactorial. Recently the discipline of ethics has been starting to find a place in large-scale biomedical collaborations. In this article we draw from our experience of working with the Malaria Genomic Epidemiology Network (MalariaGEN) and other research projects to reflect upon the integration of ethics into biomedical research. We examine the way in which ethics input may be valuable to research, the forms it tends to take, and also the problems and limitations of such collaborations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bioethicist; bioethics; biomedical research; ethics and science collaboration; ethics input

Year:  2014        PMID: 26430467      PMCID: PMC4587541          DOI: 10.1177/1747016114554252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Ethics        ISSN: 1747-0161


  22 in total

1.  Doing good and doing well.

Authors:  D Callahan
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.683

2.  Bioethics and health and human rights: a critical view.

Authors:  D Benatar
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Mission creep in the IRB world.

Authors:  C K Gunsalus; Edward M Bruner; Nicholas C Burbules; Leon Dash; Matthew Finkin; Joseph P Goldberg; William T Greenough; Gregory A Miller; Michael G Pratt
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Genetics. No longer de-identified.

Authors:  Amy L McGuire; Richard A Gibbs
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Community engagement and informed consent in the International HapMap project.

Authors:  Charles Rotimi; Mark Leppert; Ichiro Matsuda; Changqing Zeng; Houcan Zhang; Clement Adebamowo; Ike Ajayi; Toyin Aniagwu; Missy Dixon; Yoshimitsu Fukushima; Darryl Macer; Patricia Marshall; Chibuzor Nkwodimmah; Andy Peiffer; Charmaine Royal; Eiko Suda; Hui Zhao; Vivian Ota Wang; Jean McEwen
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  2007

6.  The dysregulation of human subjects research.

Authors:  Norman Fost; Robert J Levine
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  From genetic privacy to open consent.

Authors:  Jeantine E Lunshof; Ruth Chadwick; Daniel B Vorhaus; George M Church
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 53.242

8.  On the nature and sociology of bioethics.

Authors:  Mark Sheehan; Michael Dunn
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2013-03

9.  India concerned at export of genetic material.

Authors:  G Mudur
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-02-24

10.  How do we know that research ethics committees are really working? The neglected role of outcomes assessment in research ethics review.

Authors:  Carl H Coleman; Marie-Charlotte Bouësseau
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 2.652

View more
  2 in total

1.  A paradigm for understanding trust and mistrust in medical research: The Community VOICES study.

Authors:  M Smirnoff; I Wilets; D F Ragin; R Adams; J Holohan; R Rhodes; G Winkel; E M Ricci; C Clesca; L D Richardson
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2018-02-16

2.  Trust me, I'm a researcher!: The role of trust in biomedical research.

Authors:  Angeliki Kerasidou
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2017-03
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.