Literature DB >> 35724253

Community-Based Participatory Research and Human-Centered Design Principles to Advance Hearing Health Equity.

Nicole L Marrone1, Carrie L Nieman2,3, Laura Coco1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Inclusive and equitable research is an ethical imperative. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) as well as human-centered design are approaches that center partnership between community members and academic researchers. Together, academic-community research teams iteratively study community priorities, collaboratively develop ethical study designs, and co-create innovations that are accessible and meaningful to the community partners while advancing science. The foundation of the CBPR approach is reliant on its core principles of equity, colearning, shared power in decision-making, reciprocity, and mutual benefit. While the CBPR approach has been used extensively in public health and other areas of healthcare research, the approach is relatively new to audiology, otolaryngology, and hearing health research. The purpose of the present article is to advance an understanding of the CBPR approach, along with principles from human-centered design, in the context of research aimed to advance equity and access in hearing healthcare.
DESIGN: The literature is reviewed to provide an introduction for auditory scientists to the CBPR approach and human-centered design, including discussion of the underlying principles of CBPR and where it fits along a community-engaged continuum, theoretical and evaluation frameworks, as well as applications within auditory research.
RESULTS: Recent applications of CBPR have been framed broadly within the theoretical positions of the socioecological model for a systems-level approach to community-engaged research and the Health Services Utilization model within health services and disparities research using CBPR. Utilizing human-centered design strategies can work in tandem with a CBPR approach to engage a wide range of people in the research process and move toward the development of innovative yet feasible solutions.
CONCLUSIONS: Leveraging the principles of CBPR is an intricate and dynamic process, may not be a fit for some topics, some researchers' skillsets, and may be beyond some projects' resources. When implemented skillfully and authentically, CBPR can be of benefit by elevating and empowering community voices and cultural perspectives historically marginalized in society and underrepresented within research. With a focus on health equity, this review of CBPR in the study of hearing healthcare emphasizes how this approach to research can help to advance inclusion, diversity, and access to innovation.
Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 35724253      PMCID: PMC9219558          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.562


  67 in total

Review 1.  Cultural sensitivity in public health: defined and demystified.

Authors:  K Resnicow; T Baranowski; J S Ahluwalia; R L Braithwaite
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.847

Review 2.  Community-based participatory research: assessing the evidence.

Authors:  M Viswanathan; A Ammerman; E Eng; G Garlehner; K N Lohr; D Griffith; S Rhodes; C Samuel-Hodge; S Maty; L Lux; L Webb; S F Sutton; T Swinson; A Jackman; L Whitener
Journal:  Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ)       Date:  2004-08

Review 3.  A systematic review of community-based participatory research to enhance clinical trials in racial and ethnic minority groups.

Authors:  Denise De las Nueces; Karen Hacker; Ann DiGirolamo; LeRoi S Hicks
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Culture: The missing link in health research.

Authors:  M Kagawa Singer; W Dressler; S George
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Community-based participatory research (CBPR) in South Africa: engaging multiple constituents to shape the research question.

Authors:  Maghboeba Mosavel; Christian Simon; Debbie van Stade; Mara Buchbinder
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2005-06-13       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 6.  Interventional Audiology to Address Hearing Health Care Disparities: Oyendo Bien Pilot Study.

Authors:  Nicole Marrone; Maia Ingram; Maria Somoza; Daisey Sánchez Jacob; Adriana Sanchez; Stephanie Adamovich; Frances P Harris
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2017-05

7.  Racial/Ethnic and Sex Representation in US-Based Clinical Trials of Hearing Loss Management in Adults: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Corinne A Pittman; Raúl Roura; Carrie Price; Frank R Lin; Nicole Marrone; Carrie L Nieman
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 6.223

Review 8.  Auditory reality and self-assessment of hearing.

Authors:  William Noble
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-06

9.  Feasibility of community health workers as teleaudiology patient-site facilitators: a multilevel training study.

Authors:  Laura Coco; Rosie Piper; Nicole Marrone
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.437

10.  Impact of Participatory Health Research: A Test of the Community-Based Participatory Research Conceptual Model.

Authors:  John G Oetzel; Nina Wallerstein; Bonnie Duran; Shannon Sanchez-Youngman; Tung Nguyen; Kent Woo; Jun Wang; Amy Schulz; Joseph Keawe'aimoku Kaholokula; Barbara Israel; Margarita Alegria
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.