Literature DB >> 33534847

Facial shape affects self-perceived facial attractiveness.

Georgios Kanavakis1,2, Demetrios Halazonetis3, Christos Katsaros4, Nikolaos Gkantidis4.   

Abstract

Facial appearance expresses numerous cues about physical qualities as well as psychosocial and personality traits. Attractive faces are recognized clearly when seen and are often viewed advantageously in professional, social and romantic relationships. On the other hand, self-perceived attractiveness is not well understood and has been mainly attributed to psychological and cognitive factors. Here we use 3-dimensional facial surface data of a large young adult population (n = 601) to thoroughly assess the effect of facial shape on self-perceived facial attractiveness. Our results show that facial shape had a measurable effect on self-perception of facial attractiveness in both sexes. In females, self-perceived facial attractiveness was linked to decreased facial width, fuller anterior part of the lower facial third and more pronounced middle forehead and root of the nose. Males favored a well-defined chin, flatter cheeks and zygomas, and more pronounced eyebrow ridges, nose and middle forehead. The findings of this study support the notion that self-perceived facial attractiveness is not only motivated by psychological traits, but objectively measured phenotypic traits also contribute significantly. The role of social stereotypes for facial attractiveness in modern society is also inferred and discussed.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33534847      PMCID: PMC7857636          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245557

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  41 in total

1.  Precision and accuracy of the 3dMD photogrammetric system in craniomaxillofacial application.

Authors:  Heinz-Theo Lübbers; Laurent Medinger; Astrid Kruse; Klaus Wilhelm Grätz; Felix Matthews
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.046

2.  Geometric morphometrics of male facial shape in relation to physical strength and perceived attractiveness, dominance, and masculinity.

Authors:  Sonja Windhager; Katrin Schaefer; Bernhard Fink
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 1.937

3.  Age and gender differences in self-esteem-A cross-cultural window.

Authors:  Wiebke Bleidorn; Ruben C Arslan; Jaap J A Denissen; Peter J Rentfrow; Jochen E Gebauer; Jeff Potter; Samuel D Gosling
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2015-12-21

4.  Understanding evaluation of faces on social dimensions.

Authors:  Alexander Todorov; Chris P Said; Andrew D Engell; Nikolaas N Oosterhof
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  I'm hot, so i'd say you're not: the influence of objective physical attractiveness on mate selection.

Authors:  R Matthew Montoya
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2008-07-03

6.  What is typical is good: the influence of face typicality on perceived trustworthiness.

Authors:  Carmel Sofer; Ron Dotsch; Daniel H J Wigboldus; Alexander Todorov
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-12-15

7.  Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces.

Authors:  A C Little; D M Burt; I S Penton-Voak; D I Perrett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Locating attractiveness in the face space: faces are more attractive when closer to their group prototype.

Authors:  Timothy Potter; Olivier Corneille
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-06

9.  A genome-wide association study identifies five loci influencing facial morphology in Europeans.

Authors:  Fan Liu; Fedde van der Lijn; Claudia Schurmann; Gu Zhu; M Mallar Chakravarty; Pirro G Hysi; Andreas Wollstein; Oscar Lao; Marleen de Bruijne; M Arfan Ikram; Aad van der Lugt; Fernando Rivadeneira; André G Uitterlinden; Albert Hofman; Wiro J Niessen; Georg Homuth; Greig de Zubicaray; Katie L McMahon; Paul M Thompson; Amro Daboul; Ralf Puls; Katrin Hegenscheid; Liisa Bevan; Zdenka Pausova; Sarah E Medland; Grant W Montgomery; Margaret J Wright; Carol Wicking; Stefan Boehringer; Timothy D Spector; Tomáš Paus; Nicholas G Martin; Reiner Biffar; Manfred Kayser
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Human Commercial Models' Eye Colour Shows Negative Frequency-Dependent Selection.

Authors:  Isabela Rodrigues Nogueira Forti; Robert John Young
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Smile Reproducibility and Its Relationship to Self-Perceived Smile Attractiveness.

Authors:  Denitsa Dobreva; Nikolaos Gkantidis; Demetrios Halazonetis; Carlalberta Verna; Georgios Kanavakis
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-07

2.  Number of Teeth Is Related to Craniofacial Morphology in Humans.

Authors:  Elias S Oeschger; Georgios Kanavakis; Alina Cocos; Demetrios J Halazonetis; Nikolaos Gkantidis
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-01

3.  Do Specific Craniomaxillofacial Features Correlate with Psychological Distress in Adult Pretreatment Orthodontic Patients? A Cephalometric Study.

Authors:  Chu-Qiao Xiao; Yi-Dan Wan; Zhe-Bin Yan; Ya-Qi Li; Pei-Di Fan; Qiao-Yu Cheng; Xin Xiong
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 3.464

4.  A CBCT Evaluation of Esthetic Preference Regarding the Perceived Facial Attractiveness of Young Korean Female Adults with a Normal Skeletal Pattern.

Authors:  Jin-Hyoung Oh; Jae Hyun Park; Heon Jae Cho; Hye Young Seo; Jong-Moon Chae
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-25       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  Updating Standards of Facial Growth in Romanian Children and Adolescents Using the Anthropometric Method-A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Emilia Ogodescu; Malina Popa; Magda Luca; Andreea Igna; Mariana Miron; Krisztina Martha; Anca Tudor; Carmen Todea
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-16       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.