Literature DB >> 14608360

Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference.

Shinsuke Shimojo1, Claudiu Simion, Eiko Shimojo, Christian Scheier.   

Abstract

Emotions operate along the dimension of approach and aversion, and it is reasonable to assume that orienting behavior is intrinsically linked to emotionally involved processes such as preference decisions. Here we describe a gaze 'cascade effect' that was present when human observers were shown pairs of human faces and instructed to decide which face was more attractive. Their gaze was initially distributed evenly between the two stimuli, but then gradually shifted toward the face that they eventually chose. Gaze bias was significantly weaker in a face shape discrimination task. In a second series of experiments, manipulation of gaze duration, but not exposure duration alone, biased observers' preference decisions. We thus conclude that gaze is actively involved in preference formation. The gaze cascade effect was also present when participants compared abstract, unfamiliar shapes for attractiveness, suggesting that orienting and preference for objects in general are intrinsically linked in a positive feedback loop leading to the conscious choice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14608360     DOI: 10.1038/nn1150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Neurosci        ISSN: 1097-6256            Impact factor:   24.884


  154 in total

1.  Preference suppression caused by misattribution of task-irrelevant subliminal motion.

Authors:  Kazuhisa Shibata; Takeo Watanabe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice.

Authors:  Ian Krajbich; Carrie Armel; Antonio Rangel
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-12       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  The relationship between attention allocation and cheating.

Authors:  Andrea Pittarello; Daphna Motro; Enrico Rubaltelli; Patrik Pluchino
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

4.  The Nonverbal Transmission of Intergroup Bias: A Model of Bias Contagion with Implications for Social Policy.

Authors:  Max Weisbuch; Kristin Pauker
Journal:  Soc Issues Policy Rev       Date:  2011-12-01

5.  Value-based attentional capture affects multi-alternative decision making.

Authors:  Sebastian Gluth; Mikhail S Spektor; Jörg Rieskamp
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Temporal isolation of neural processes underlying face preference decisions.

Authors:  Hackjin Kim; Ralph Adolphs; John P O'Doherty; Shinsuke Shimojo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Through their eyes: selective attention in peahens during courtship.

Authors:  Jessica L Yorzinski; Gail L Patricelli; Jason S Babcock; John M Pearson; Michael L Platt
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  SHIFTING THE PROTOTYPE: EXPERIENCE WITH FACES INFLUENCES AFFECTIVE AND ATTRACTIVENESS PREFERENCES.

Authors:  Connor P Principe; Judith H Langlois
Journal:  Soc Cogn       Date:  2012-02

9.  Locating attractiveness in the face space: faces are more attractive when closer to their group prototype.

Authors:  Timothy Potter; Olivier Corneille
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-06

10.  Synchronising movements with the sounds of a virtual partner enhances partner likeability.

Authors:  Jacques Launay; Roger T Dean; Freya Bailes
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2014-05-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.