Literature DB >> 18567074

Non-invasive means of measuring hepatic fat content.

Sanjeev-R Mehta1, E-Louise Thomas, Jimmy-D Bell, Desmond-G Johnston, Simon-D Taylor-Robinson.   

Abstract

Hepatic steatosis affects 20% to 30% of the general adult population in the western world. Currently, the technique of choice for determining hepatic fat deposition and the stage of fibrosis is liver biopsy. However, it is an invasive procedure and its use is limited, particularly in children. It may also be subject to sampling error. Non-invasive techniques such as ultrasound, computerised tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy ((1)H MRS) can detect hepatic steatosis, but currently cannot distinguish between simple steatosis and steatohepatitis, or stage the degree of fibrosis accurately. Ultrasound is widely used to detect hepatic steatosis, but its sensitivity is reduced in the morbidly obese and also in those with small amounts of fatty infiltration. It has been used to grade hepatic fat content, but this is subjective. CT can detect hepatic steatosis, but exposes subjects to ionising radiation, thus limiting its use in longitudinal studies and in children. Recently, magnetic resonance (MR) techniques using chemical shift imaging have provided a quantitative assessment of the degree of hepatic fatty infiltration, which correlates well with liver biopsy results in the same patients. Similarly, in vivo (1)H MRS is a fast, safe, non-invasive method for the quantification of intrahepatocellular lipid (IHCL) levels. Both techniques will be useful tools in future longitudinal clinical studies, either in examining the natural history of conditions causing hepatic steatosis (e.g. non-alcoholic fatty liver disease), or in testing new treatments for these conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18567074      PMCID: PMC2716608          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.14.3476

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  86 in total

1.  Fatty infiltration of the liver: quantification with phase-contrast MR imaging at 1.5 T vs biopsy.

Authors:  H Levenson; F Greensite; J Hoefs; L Friloux; G Applegate; E Silva; G Kanel; R Buxton
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Proton MR spectroscopy in quantitative in vivo determination of fat content in human liver steatosis.

Authors:  R Longo; P Pollesello; C Ricci; F Masutti; B J Kvam; L Bercich; L S Crocè; P Grigolato; S Paoletti; B de Bernard
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1995 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Quantification of liver fat using magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Authors:  C Thomsen; U Becker; K Winkler; P Christoffersen; M Jensen; O Henriksen
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 4.  Mechanisms of Disease: pathogenesis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Arun J Sanyal
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2005-01

5.  The natural history of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a follow-up study of forty-two patients for up to 21 years.

Authors:  E E Powell; W G Cooksley; R Hanson; J Searle; J W Halliday; L W Powell
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 17.425

6.  Sonography of diffuse benign liver disease: accuracy of pattern recognition and grading.

Authors:  L Needleman; A B Kurtz; M D Rifkin; H S Cooper; M E Pasto; B B Goldberg
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Fatty infiltration of the liver. Quantification by 1H localized magnetic resonance spectroscopy and comparison with computed tomography.

Authors:  R Longo; C Ricci; F Masutti; R Vidimari; L S Crocé; L Bercich; C Tiribelli; L Dalla Palma
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 6.016

8.  Hypoechoic lesions in the 'bright liver': a reliable indicator of fatty change. A prospective study.

Authors:  E Caturelli; M M Squillante; A Andriulli; A Cedrone; C Cellerino; M Pompili; E R Manoja; G L Rapaccini
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.029

9.  Positional cloning of the mouse obese gene and its human homologue.

Authors:  Y Zhang; R Proenca; M Maffei; M Barone; L Leopold; J M Friedman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-12-01       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Comparison of liver histology with ultrasonography in assessing diffuse parenchymal liver disease.

Authors:  A E Joseph; S H Saverymuttu; S al-Sam; M G Cook; J D Maxwell
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.350

View more
  70 in total

1.  Biochemical determination of lipid content in hepatic steatosis by the Soxtec method.

Authors:  Elizabeth Hijona; Lander Hijona; Mikel Larzabal; Cristina Sarasqueta; Pablo Aldazabal; Juan Arenas; Luis Bujanda
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Mapping of liver fat with triple-echo gradient echo imaging: validation against 3.0-T proton MR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Boris Guiu; Romaric Loffroy; Jean-Michel Petit; Serge Aho; Douraied Ben Salem; David Masson; Patrick Hillon; Jean-Pierre Cercueil; Denis Krause
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Increased risk of cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease in NAFLD.

Authors:  Enzo Bonora; Giovanni Targher
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 46.802

4.  Noninvasive evaluation of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH).

Authors:  Fariborz Mansour-Ghanaei; Masrour Vahhabi-Moghaddam; Farahnaz Joukar; Mehrnaz Asgharnezhad; Noufar Noufar
Journal:  Caspian J Intern Med       Date:  2013

5.  Assessment of a high-SNR chemical-shift-encoded MRI with complex reconstruction for proton density fat fraction (PDFF) estimation overall and in the low-fat range.

Authors:  Charlie C Park; Catherine Hooker; Jonathan C Hooker; Emily Bass; William Haufe; Alexandra Schlein; Yesenia Covarrubias; Elhamy Heba; Mark Bydder; Tanya Wolfson; Anthony Gamst; Rohit Loomba; Jeffrey Schwimmer; Diego Hernando; Scott B Reeder; Michael Middleton; Claude B Sirlin; Gavin Hamilton
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-04-29       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 6.  Liver fat content determined by magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy.

Authors:  Fabian Springer; Jürgen Machann; Claus D Claussen; Fritz Schick; Nina F Schwenzer
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Evidence and recommendations for imaging liver fat in children, based on systematic review.

Authors:  Hannah I Awai; Kimberly P Newton; Claude B Sirlin; Cynthia Behling; Jeffrey B Schwimmer
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 8.  Noninvasive imaging assessment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: focus on liver scintigraphy.

Authors:  Cristiane Valle Tovo; Angelo Zambam de Mattos; Gabriela Perdomo Coral; Fernanda Schild Branco; Eiji Suwa; Angelo Alves de Mattos
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Ex vivo study of quantitative ultrasound parameters in fatty rabbit livers.

Authors:  Goutam Ghoshal; Roberto J Lavarello; Jeremy P Kemmerer; Rita J Miller; Michael L Oelze
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Determinants of second-order bile duct visualization at CT cholangiography in potential living liver donors.

Authors:  Alexander W Keedy; Richard S Breiman; Emily M Webb; John P Roberts; Fergus V Coakley; Benjamin M Yeh
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.959

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.