Literature DB >> 1898804

Fatty infiltration of the liver: quantification with phase-contrast MR imaging at 1.5 T vs biopsy.

H Levenson1, F Greensite, J Hoefs, L Friloux, G Applegate, E Silva, G Kanel, R Buxton.   

Abstract

Quantification of hepatic fat content by application of MR phase-contrast imaging (Dixon method) at 1.5 T was compared with results of biopsy in 16 patients with a variety of liver abnormalities. Motion artifact was suppressed by employing six or eight averages of short TR in-phase (echo offset, 0 msec), out-of-phase (echo offset, 1.1 msec), and in-phase (echo offset, 2.2 msec) spin-echo pulse sequences. The 360 degree out-of-phase sequence was used to assess the impact of T2* decay on this method of estimating fat fraction. A standard two-echo long TR sequence also was obtained in all patients. Histologic preparations from the biopsy specimens were examined by a pathologist who had no knowledge of the MR results and were graded according to overall visual assessment as belonging to one of four categories of fat fraction. Results of the MR-calculated apparent fat fraction were compared directly with biopsy category and were also placed in MR fat fraction categories, allowing estimation of the statistical correlation between the biopsy and MR grading systems. Eight of eight patients with biopsy categories indicating a fat fraction of less than 0.25 were computed by MR to have a fat fraction of less than 0.1. Seven of eight patients with biopsy categories indicating a fat fraction of greater than 0.25 were computed by MR to have a fat fraction of at least 0.24. The MR-calculated apparent fat fraction category correlated significantly with the histologic biopsy category (r = .86, p less than .01). When compared with the in-phase image, decreased signal from liver was visually apparent on the 180 degree out-of-phase images in all cases in which the fat fraction was at least 0.24, but there was no indication of fatty liver on the standard T1- or T2-weighted images. Calculated T2 also showed no correlation with degree of fatty deposition. Correction for T2* decay by using the 360 degree out-of-phase acquisition in addition to the standard 0 degree and 180 degree out-of-phase images had little effect on fat fraction computation. Phase-contrast MR is a promising noninvasive method for quantitative assessment of fatty deposition in the liver.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1898804     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.156.2.1898804

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  21 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative Assessment of Liver Fat with Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Scott B Reeder; Irene Cruite; Gavin Hamilton; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 2.  Quantification of liver fat with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Scott B Reeder; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.266

3.  Proton density fat-fraction: a standardized MR-based biomarker of tissue fat concentration.

Authors:  Scott B Reeder; Houchun H Hu; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Characterization of hypoechoic focal hepatic lesions in patients with fatty liver: diagnostic performance and confidence of contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

Authors:  Tommaso Vincenzo Bartolotta; Adele Taibbi; Massimo Galia; Giuseppe Runza; Domenica Matranga; Massimo Midiri; Roberto Lagalla
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-10-03       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Liver fat content determined by magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy.

Authors:  Fabian Springer; Jürgen Machann; Claus D Claussen; Fritz Schick; Nina F Schwenzer
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  [Techniques for quantification of liver fat in risk stratification of diabetics].

Authors:  J-P Kühn; M C Spoerl; C Mahlke; K Hegenscheid
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  Accurate and simple method for quantification of hepatic fat content using magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective study in biopsy-proven nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Tomoko Hatta; Yasunari Fujinaga; Masumi Kadoya; Hitoshi Ueda; Hiroaki Murayama; Masahiro Kurozumi; Kazuhiko Ueda; Michiharu Komatsu; Tadanobu Nagaya; Satoru Joshita; Ryo Kodama; Eiji Tanaka; Tsuyoshi Uehara; Kenji Sano; Naoki Tanaka
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 7.527

8.  Evaluation of liver fat in the presence of iron with MRI using T2* correction: a clinical approach.

Authors:  Benjamin Henninger; Henninger Benjamin; Christian Kremser; Kremser Christian; Stefan Rauch; Rauch Stefan; Robert Eder; Eder Robert; Werner Judmaier; Judmaier Werner; Heinz Zoller; Zoller Heinz; Henrik Michaely; Michaely Henrik; Michael Schocke; Schocke Michael
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Evaluation of diffuse liver steatosis by ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging: which modality is best?

Authors:  Aliya Qayyum; Daryl M Chen; Richard S Breiman; Antonio C Westphalen; Benjamin M Yeh; Kirk D Jones; Ying Lu; Fergus V Coakley; Peter W Callen
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.605

10.  Non-invasive means of measuring hepatic fat content.

Authors:  Sanjeev-R Mehta; E-Louise Thomas; Jimmy-D Bell; Desmond-G Johnston; Simon-D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.