Literature DB >> 23617485

Determinants of second-order bile duct visualization at CT cholangiography in potential living liver donors.

Alexander W Keedy1, Richard S Breiman, Emily M Webb, John P Roberts, Fergus V Coakley, Benjamin M Yeh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to investigate the determinants of second-order bile duct visualization at CT cholangiography in living potential liver donors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified 143 potential living liver donors (83 men and 60 women; mean age, 37 years) evaluated with CT cholangiography, which included a slow infusion of iodipamide meglumine with CT acquisition 15 minutes after biliary contrast agent administration. Two readers independently scored the visualization of the second-order bile duct branches on a previously established 4-point scale (0 = not seen, 1 = faintly seen, 2 = well seen, and 3 = excellent visualization). Multivariate analysis was used to investigate the correlation between visualization scores and potential determinants of second-order bile duct opacification, specifically age, body mass index, creatinine level, total and direct bilirubin levels, alkaline phosphatase level, aspartate aminotransferase level, alanine aminotransferase level, patient maximum linear width, CT noise, and hepatosplenic attenuation difference at unenhanced CT.
RESULTS: The mean (± SD) second-order bile duct visualization scores were 2.35 ± 0.66 and 2.55 ± 0.60 for readers 1 and 2, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, the only independent predictors of reduced second-order bile duct visualization were higher alkaline phosphatase level (p = 0.01) and higher CT noise (p = 0.02).
CONCLUSION: Higher serum alkaline phosphatase level and higher CT noise in potential living liver donors indicate a higher risk of poor second-order bile duct visualization at CT cholangiography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23617485      PMCID: PMC5308084          DOI: 10.2214/AJR.11.8364

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  35 in total

1.  Dual-energy computed-tomography cholangiography in potential donors for living-related liver transplantation: initial experience.

Authors:  Christof M Sommer; Christoph B Schwarzwaelder; Wolfram Stiller; Sebastian T Schindera; Tobias Heye; Ulrike Stampfl; Stefanie Ramsauer; Nadine Bellemann; Juergen Weitz; Jan Schmidt; Lars Grenacher; Hans U Kauczor; Boris A Radeleff
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 6.016

2.  Spiral computed tomography-intravenous cholangiography with three-dimensional reconstructions for imaging the biliary tree.

Authors:  E Alibrahim; R N Gibson; J Vincent; T Speer; N Collier; C Jardine
Journal:  Australas Radiol       Date:  2006-04

3.  Inappropriate use of bivariable analysis to screen risk factors for use in multivariable analysis.

Authors:  G W Sun; T L Shook; G L Kay
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Three-dimensional helical computed tomographic cholangiography: application to living related hepatic transplantation.

Authors:  Y F Cheng; T Y Lee; C L Chen; T L Huang; Y S Chen; C C Lui
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.863

5.  Biliary excretion of contrast media.

Authors:  G Rosati; P Schiantarelli
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1970 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.016

6.  Alkaline phosphatase and the oral cholecystogram.

Authors:  J P Owen; M J Keir; M I Lavelle; P A Smith
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  [Spiral CT of the abdomen: weight-adjusted dose reduction].

Authors:  E Coppenrath; C Schmid; R Brandl; U Szeimies; K Hahn
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2001-01

8.  Morphine cholescintigraphy.

Authors:  L Flancbaum; S M Alden
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1990-09

Review 9.  Non-invasive assessment and quantification of liver steatosis by ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Nina F Schwenzer; Fabian Springer; Christina Schraml; Norbert Stefan; Jürgen Machann; Fritz Schick
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 25.083

10.  Biliary tract depiction in living potential liver donors: comparison of conventional MR, mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced excretory MR, and multi-detector row CT cholangiography--initial experience.

Authors:  Benjamin M Yeh; Richard S Breiman; Bachir Taouli; Aliya Qayyum; John P Roberts; Fergus V Coakley
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  2 in total

1.  The impact of primary sclerosing cholangitis or inflammatory bowel disease on cholangiocarcinoma phenotype, therapy, and survival.

Authors:  Daljeet Chahal; Chris Shamatutu; Bill Salh; Janine Davies
Journal:  JGH Open       Date:  2020-08-11

2.  Graft harvest of right posterior segment for living-donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Tomohide Hori; Fumitaka Oike; Yasuhiro Ogura; Kohei Ogawa; Shinji Uemoto
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2014-06-02
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.