Literature DB >> 20923866

Among-individual variation in pollen limitation and inbreeding depression in a mixed-mating shrub.

Juan P González-Varo1, Anna Traveset.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Variation in inbreeding depression (δ) among individual plants is considered to play a central role in mating system evolution and population genetics. Moreover, such variation could be linked to individual susceptibility to pollen limitation (PL) because those individuals strongly affected by δ for seed production will require more outcross pollen for setting a given number of fruits or seeds. However, no study has tested explicitly for associations between PL and δ at the individual plant level. This study assesses the extent of among-individual variation in PL and δ, the consistency of δ across life stages, and the relationships between individual PL and δ in the mixed-mating shrub Myrtus communis.
METHODS: Controlled hand-pollinations were performed in a natural M. communis population. Marked flowers were monitored until fruit production and a greenhouse experiment was conducted with the seeds produced. KEY
RESULTS: Compared with selfing, outcross-pollination enhanced seed number per fruit, germination rate and seedling growth, but did not enhance fruit-set. Only seed number per fruit was pollen limited and, thus, cumulative pollen limitation depended more on pollen quality (outcross pollen) than on quantity. The effects of δ varied considerably across life stages and individual plants. Cumulative δ was high across individuals (mean δ = 0·65), although there were no positive correlations between δ values at different life stages. Interestingly, maternal plants showing stronger δ for seed production were more pollen limited, but they were also less affected by δ for seedling growth because of a seed size/number trade-off.
CONCLUSIONS: Results show a general inconsistency in δ across life stages and individuals, suggesting that different deleterious loci are acting at different stages. The association between δ and PL at the individual level corroborates the idea that pollen limitation may be 'genotype-dependent' regardless of other factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20923866      PMCID: PMC2990669          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcq200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  12 in total

Review 1.  The genetic basis of inbreeding depression.

Authors:  B Charlesworth; D Charlesworth
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  Inbreeding depression in two populations of Arenaria uniflora (Caryophyllaceae) with contrasting mating systems.

Authors:  L Fishman
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Inbreeding depression and mixed mating in Leptosiphon jepsonii: a comparison of three populations.

Authors:  Carol Goodwillie; Mary Catherine Knight
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Expanding the limits of the pollen-limitation concept: effects of pollen quantity and quality.

Authors:  Marcelo A Aizen; Lawrence D Harder
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.499

5.  Effects of stress and phenotypic variation on inbreeding depression in Brassica rapa.

Authors:  Donald M Waller; Jefferey Dole; Andrew J Bersch
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 6.  Floral adaptation and diversification under pollen limitation.

Authors:  Lawrence D Harder; Marcelo A Aizen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Evaluation of the extent of among-family variation in inbreeding depression in the perennial herb Scabiosa columbaria (Dipsacaceae).

Authors:  F Xavier Picó; N Joop Ouborg; Jan M Van Groenendael
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.844

8.  Environmental variation influences the magnitude of inbreeding depression in Cucurbita pepo ssp. texana (Cucurbitaceae).

Authors:  C Nelson Hayes; James A Winsor; Andrew G Stephenson
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.411

9.  Experimental evolution of the genetic load and its implications for the genetic basis of inbreeding depression.

Authors:  Charles W Fox; Kristy L Scheibly; David H Reed
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Effects of reproductive compensation, gamete discounting and reproductive assurance on mating-system diversity in hermaphrodites.

Authors:  Lawrence D Harder; Shane A Richards; Matthew B Routley
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-12-06       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  5 in total

1.  Contrasting heterozygosity-fitness correlations between populations of a self-compatible shrub in a fragmented landscape.

Authors:  Juan P González-Varo; Abelardo Aparicio; Sébastien Lavergne; Juan Arroyo; Rafael G Albaladejo
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  Facilitative pollinator sharing decreases with floral similarity in multiple systems.

Authors:  Melissa K Ha; Scott A Schneider; Lynn S Adler
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  High lifetime inbreeding depression counteracts the reproductive assurance benefit of selfing in a mass-flowering shrub.

Authors:  Chloé E L Delmas; Pierre-Olivier Cheptou; Nathalie Escaravage; André Pornon
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2014-11-30       Impact factor: 3.260

4.  High Correlated Paternity Leads to Negative Effects on Progeny Performance in Two Mediterranean Shrub Species.

Authors:  Sofia Nora; Abelardo Aparicio; Rafael G Albaladejo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Sex expression and inbreeding depression in progeny derived from an extraordinary hermaphrodite of Salix subfragilis.

Authors:  Teruyoshi Nagamitsu; Norihiro Futamura
Journal:  Bot Stud       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 2.787

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.