Literature DB >> 18561675

Frequency distribution of the nanoparticle magnetization in the presence of a static as well as a harmonic magnetic field.

John B Weaver1, Adam M Rauwerdink, Charles R Sullivan, Ian Baker.   

Abstract

We explore the properties of the signal from magnetic nanoparticles. The nanoparticle signal has been used to generate images in magnetic particle imaging (MPI). MPI promises to be one of the most sensitive methods of imaging small numbers magnetic nanoparticles and therefore shows promise for molecular imaging. The nanoparticle signal is generated with a pure sinusoidal magnetic field that repeatedly saturates the nanoparticles creating harmonics in the induced magnetization that are easily isolated from the driving field. Signal from a selected position is isolated using a static magnetic field to completely saturate all of the particles outside a voxel enabling an image to be formed voxel by voxel. The signal produced by the magnetization of the nanoparticles contains only odd harmonics. However, it is demonstrated experimentally that with the addition of a static magnetic field bias even harmonics are introduced which increase the total signal significantly. Further, the distribution of signal among the harmonics depends on the static bias field so that information might be used to localize the nanoparticle distribution. Finally, the field required to completely saturate nanoparticles can be quite large and theory predicts that the field required is determined by the smallest nanoparticles in the sample.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18561675      PMCID: PMC4108637          DOI: 10.1118/1.2903449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  8 in total

1.  NC100150 Injection, a preparation of optimized iron oxide nanoparticles for positive-contrast MR angiography.

Authors:  K E Kellar; D K Fujii; W H Gunther; K Briley-Saebø; A Bjørnerud; M Spiller; S H Koenig
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Single metallic nanoparticle imaging for protein detection in cells.

Authors:  L Cognet; C Tardin; D Boyer; D Choquet; P Tamarat; B Lounis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Magnetization and harmonic response of YBa2Cu3O7- delta :Ag composites.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev B Condens Matter       Date:  1992-01-01

4.  Limits of detection of SPIO at 3.0 T using T2 relaxometry.

Authors:  H Dahnke; T Schaeffter
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Tomographic imaging using the nonlinear response of magnetic particles.

Authors:  Bernhard Gleich; Jürgen Weizenecker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-06-30       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  A simulation study on the resolution and sensitivity of magnetic particle imaging.

Authors:  J Weizenecker; J Borgert; B Gleich
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  In vivo molecular imaging biomarkers: clinical pharmacology's new "PET"?

Authors:  R Nutt; L J Vento; M H T Ridinger
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 6.875

8.  In vivo magnetic resonance imaging of single cells in mouse brain with optical validation.

Authors:  Chris Heyn; John A Ronald; Lisa T Mackenzie; Ian C MacDonald; Ann F Chambers; Brian K Rutt; Paula J Foster
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.668

  8 in total
  24 in total

1.  Harmonic phase angle as a concentration-independent measure of nanoparticle dynamics.

Authors:  Adam M Rauwerdink; John B Weaver
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Ferrohydrodynamic modeling of magnetic nanoparticle harmonic spectra for magnetic particle imaging.

Authors:  Rohan Dhavalikar; Lorena Maldonado-Camargo; Nicolas Garraud; Carlos Rinaldi
Journal:  J Appl Phys       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 2.546

3.  Measurement of magnetic nanoparticle relaxation time.

Authors:  John B Weaver; Esra Kuehlert
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Magnetic nanoparticle temperature estimation.

Authors:  John B Weaver; Adam M Rauwerdink; Eric W Hansen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Nanoparticle temperature estimation in combined ac and dc magnetic fields.

Authors:  Adam M Rauwerdink; Eric W Hansen; John B Weaver
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Concurrent quantification of multiple nanoparticle bound states.

Authors:  Adam M Rauwerdink; John B Weaver
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Modeling the Brownian relaxation of nanoparticle ferrofluids: comparison with experiment.

Authors:  Michael A Martens; Robert J Deissler; Yong Wu; Lisa Bauer; Zhen Yao; Robert Brown; Mark Griswold
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Experimental and simulation studies on the behavior of signal harmonics in magnetic particle imaging.

Authors:  Kenya Murase; Takashi Konishi; Yuki Takeuchi; Hiroshige Takata; Shigeyoshi Saito
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2013-04-16

9.  Temperature of the magnetic nanoparticle microenvironment: estimation from relaxation times.

Authors:  I M Perreard; D B Reeves; X Zhang; E Kuehlert; E R Forauer; J B Weaver
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 10.  Microchip-based detection of magnetically labeled cancer biomarkers.

Authors:  Melaku Muluneh; David Issadore
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 15.470

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.