Literature DB >> 15844156

Limits of detection of SPIO at 3.0 T using T2 relaxometry.

H Dahnke1, T Schaeffter.   

Abstract

T(2)* relaxometry for quantitative MR imaging is strongly hampered by large-scale field inhomogeneities, which lead to signal losses and an overestimation of the relaxation rate R(2)*. This is of particular importance for the sensitive detection of iron oxide contrast agent distributions. To derive an accurate measurement of T(2)*, a main field inhomogeneity correction is applied: the main field inhomogeneity is derived from multislice T(2)* relaxometry data and used as an initial value for an iterative optimization, by which the relaxation signal is corrected for each voxel. These corrected T(2)* maps show reduced influence of the local field variation and contain information about the local SPIO concentration. The method was tested on phantoms and the limit of detection of SPIO labeled cells using T(2)* relaxometry was estimated in volunteers to be 120 x 10(3) cells/mL (2.4 microg Fe/mL) in the brain and 385 x 10(3) cells/mL (8 microg Fe/mL) in the liver. Copyright 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15844156     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.20435

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  48 in total

1.  R*(2) mapping in the presence of macroscopic B₀ field variations.

Authors:  Diego Hernando; Karl K Vigen; Ann Shimakawa; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Magnetic resonance monitoring of focused ultrasound/magnetic nanoparticle targeting delivery of therapeutic agents to the brain.

Authors:  Hao-Li Liu; Mu-Yi Hua; Hung-Wei Yang; Chiung-Yin Huang; Po-Chun Chu; Jia-Shin Wu; I-Chou Tseng; Jiun-Jie Wang; Tzu-Chen Yen; Pin-Yuan Chen; Kuo-Chen Wei
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  [Molecular and parametric imaging with iron oxides].

Authors:  L Matuszewski; B Tombach; W Heindel; C Bremer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Magnetic field dependence of the distribution of NMR relaxation times in the living human brain.

Authors:  A M Oros-Peusquens; M Laurila; N J Shah
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  Carboxylated superparamagnetic iron oxide particles label cells intracellularly without transfection agents.

Authors:  Volker Mailänder; Myriam Ricarda Lorenz; Verena Holzapfel; Anna Musyanovych; Karin Fuchs; Markus Wiesneth; Paul Walther; Katharina Landfester; Hubert Schrezenmeier
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Magnetic nanoparticle temperature estimation.

Authors:  John B Weaver; Adam M Rauwerdink; Eric W Hansen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Utilizing different methods for visualizing susceptibility from a single multi-gradient echo dataset.

Authors:  Gopal Varma; Steen Fjord Pedersen; Matthias Taupitz; Rene Michael Botnar; Hannes Dahnke; Stephen Frederick Keevil; Tobias Schaeffter
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 8.  Quantification of liver iron with MRI: state of the art and remaining challenges.

Authors:  Diego Hernando; Yakir S Levin; Claude B Sirlin; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  GESFIDE-PROPELLER approach for simultaneous R2 and R2* measurements in the abdomen.

Authors:  Ning Jin; Yang Guo; Zhuoli Zhang; Longjiang Zhang; Guangming Lu; Andrew C Larson
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 10.  Detection and quantification of magnetically labeled cells by cellular MRI.

Authors:  Wei Liu; Joseph A Frank
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 3.528

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.