John B Weaver1, Esra Kuehlert. 1. Department of Radiology, Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, NH 03756, USA. john.b.weaver@dartmouth.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: Nanoparticle relaxation time measurements have many applications including characterizing molecular binding, viscosity, heating, and local matrix stiffness. The methods capable of in vivo application are extremely limited. The hypothesis investigated by the authors was that the relaxation time could be measured quantitatively using magnetic spectroscopy of nanoparticle Brownian motion (MSB). METHODS: The MSB signal (1) reflects the nanoparticle rotational Brownian motion, (2) can be measured from very low nanoparticle concentrations, and (3) is a function of the product of the drive frequency and the relaxation time characterizing Brownian motion. To estimate the relaxation time, the MSB signal was measured at several frequencies. The MSB signal for nanoparticles with altered relaxation time is a scaled version of that for reference nanoparticles with a known relaxation time. The scaling factor linking the altered and reference MSB measurements is the same factor linking the altered and reference relaxation times. The method was tested using glycerol solutions of varying viscosities to obtain continuously variable relaxation times. RESULTS: The measured relaxation time increased with increasing viscosity of the solution in which the nanoparticles resided. The MSB estimated relaxation time matched the calculated relaxation times based on viscosity with 2% average error. CONCLUSIONS: MSB can be used to monitor the nanoparticle relaxation time quantitatively through a scale space correlation of the MSB signal as a function of frequency.
PURPOSE: Nanoparticle relaxation time measurements have many applications including characterizing molecular binding, viscosity, heating, and local matrix stiffness. The methods capable of in vivo application are extremely limited. The hypothesis investigated by the authors was that the relaxation time could be measured quantitatively using magnetic spectroscopy of nanoparticle Brownian motion (MSB). METHODS: The MSB signal (1) reflects the nanoparticle rotational Brownian motion, (2) can be measured from very low nanoparticle concentrations, and (3) is a function of the product of the drive frequency and the relaxation time characterizing Brownian motion. To estimate the relaxation time, the MSB signal was measured at several frequencies. The MSB signal for nanoparticles with altered relaxation time is a scaled version of that for reference nanoparticles with a known relaxation time. The scaling factor linking the altered and reference MSB measurements is the same factor linking the altered and reference relaxation times. The method was tested using glycerol solutions of varying viscosities to obtain continuously variable relaxation times. RESULTS: The measured relaxation time increased with increasing viscosity of the solution in which the nanoparticles resided. The MSB estimated relaxation time matched the calculated relaxation times based on viscosity with 2% average error. CONCLUSIONS: MSB can be used to monitor the nanoparticle relaxation time quantitatively through a scale space correlation of the MSB signal as a function of frequency.
Authors: L-P Choo-Smith; H G M Edwards; H P Endtz; J M Kros; F Heule; H Barr; J S Robinson; H A Bruining; G J Puppels Journal: Biopolymers Date: 2002 Impact factor: 2.505
Authors: Robert B Innis; Vincent J Cunningham; Jacques Delforge; Masahiro Fujita; Albert Gjedde; Roger N Gunn; James Holden; Sylvain Houle; Sung-Cheng Huang; Masanori Ichise; Hidehiro Iida; Hiroshi Ito; Yuichi Kimura; Robert A Koeppe; Gitte M Knudsen; Juhani Knuuti; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Marc Laruelle; Jean Logan; Ralph Paul Maguire; Mark A Mintun; Evan D Morris; Ramin Parsey; Julie C Price; Mark Slifstein; Vesna Sossi; Tetsuya Suhara; John R Votaw; Dean F Wong; Richard E Carson Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2007-05-09 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Michael A Martens; Robert J Deissler; Yong Wu; Lisa Bauer; Zhen Yao; Robert Brown; Mark Griswold Journal: Med Phys Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: John B Weaver; Dylan B Ness; Jennifer Fields; Dhrubo Jyoti; Scott W Gordon-Wylie; Brent L Berwin; Sohail Mirza; Steven N Fiering Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2020-06-11 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Ian Baker; Steve N Fiering; Karl E Griswold; P Jack Hoopes; Katerina Kekalo; Christian Ndong; Keith Paulsen; Alicea A Petryk; Brian Pogue; Fridon Shubitidze; John Weaver Journal: Nanomedicine (Lond) Date: 2015 Impact factor: 5.307
Authors: John B Weaver; Xiaojuan Zhang; Esra Kuehlert; Seiko Toraya-Brown; Daniel B Reeves; Irina M Perreard; Steven Fiering Journal: Nanotechnology Date: 2013-07-18 Impact factor: 3.874
Authors: Xiaojuan Zhang; Daniel B Reeves; Irina M Perreard; Warren C Kett; Karl E Griswold; Barjor Gimi; John B Weaver Journal: Biosens Bioelectron Date: 2013-07-04 Impact factor: 10.618
Authors: Andrew J Giustini; Irina Perreard; Adam M Rauwerdink; P Jack Hoopes; John B Weaver Journal: Integr Biol (Camb) Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 2.192