Literature DB >> 1855563

Adaptive plasticity in the gaze stabilizing synergy of slow and saccadic eye movements.

J Bloomberg1, G Melvill Jones, B Segal.   

Abstract

When a normal human subject is briefly turned in total darkness while trying to "look" at a spatially fixed target, the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) produces slow-phase compensatory eye movements tending to hold the eyes on target. However, slow-phase compensation per se is generally inadequate in these circumstances. Nevertheless it has recently been found, that even in the dark, this inadequacy tends to be corrected by supplementary saccades usually acting in the compensatory direction. The present study further investigates this phenomenon by measuring the respective contributions of saccadic, slow-phase and overall net compensation in 9 subjects tested before and after 30% adaptive attenuation of VOR slow-phase gain. In each test series, subjects attempted to stabilize their gaze on a previously seen target during each of 40 brief (approximately 0.5 s) whole body rotations (40 degrees/s, 20 degrees amp) conducted in complete darkness. The adaptive experience comprised 2 h of full-field visual suppression of the VOR during sinusoidal rotation of subject and surround at 1/6 Hz and 40 degrees/s velocity amplitude. Before adaptation, the cumulative slow-phase and cumulative saccadic components produced on average 78% and 14% respectively of the ideal (100%) compensation, thus yielding an overall net compensation which was 92% of the desired value. After adaptation, the corresponding values in the same population were 53%, 18% and 71% respectively. Thus after adaptation, the combined saccadic-slow-phase response brought the final gaze position to a point in space that was systematically shifted in the direction of head rotation (i.e. undercompensation). Subjects re-exposed to 30 min of normal visual-vestibular interaction displayed a variety of recovery patterns using different combinations of slow and saccadic eye movements. However, there was a consistent "synergistic" tendency for saccadic eye movements to improve slow-phase performance, regardless of the subject's adaptive state. In one subject, compensatory saccadic eye movements corrected a consistent directional asymmetry in the slow-phase response. It is suggested that a conscious vestibular percept of self-rotation might underlie the combined saccadic-slow-phase response, and that the net under performance after adaptation might reflect attenuation of this percept relative to the actual rotational stimulus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1855563     DOI: 10.1007/bf00231760

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  27 in total

1.  Adaptation of the human vestibuloocular reflex to magnifying lenses.

Authors:  G M Gauthier; D A Robinson
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1975-07-11       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 2.  Plasticity in the adult vestibulo-ocular reflex arc.

Authors:  G M Jones
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1977-04-26       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  The corneofundal potential and the electrooculogram. Aspects of normal physiology and variability.

Authors:  E Krogh
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Suppl       Date:  1979

4.  Goal-directed vestibulo-ocular function in man: gaze stabilization by slow-phase and saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  B N Segal; A Katsarkas
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Voluntary modification of the rotatory induced vestibulo-ocular reflex by fixating imaginary targets.

Authors:  E J Furst; J Goldberg; H A Jenkins
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1987 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.494

6.  Adaptive modification of the vestibulo-ocular reflex by mental effort in darkness.

Authors:  G M Jones; A Berthoz; B Segal
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Voluntary control of the human vestibulo-ocular reflex.

Authors:  R W Baloh; K Lyerly; R D Yee; V Honrubia
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1984 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.494

8.  Adaptive gain control of vestibuloocular reflex by the cerebellum.

Authors:  D A Robinson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Adaptive modification of the rabbit's horizontal vestibulo-ocular reflex during sustained vestibular and optokinetic stimulation.

Authors:  M Ito; P J Jastreboff; Y Miyashita
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Voluntary modulation of the vestibuloocular reflex in humans and its relation to smooth pursuit.

Authors:  P A McKinley; B W Peterson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  18 in total

1.  Adaptation of vestibular signals for self-motion perception.

Authors:  Rebecca J St George; Brian L Day; Richard C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  On the nature of the vestibular control of arm-reaching movements during whole-body rotations.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Bresciani; Gabriel M Gauthier; Jean-Louis Vercher; Jean Blouin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-05-14       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The interplay between strategic and adaptive control mechanisms in plastic recalibration of locomotor function.

Authors:  Jason T Richards; Ajitkumar P Mulavara; Jacob J Bloomberg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Modification of compensatory saccades after aVOR gain recovery.

Authors:  Michael C Schubert; Americo A Migliaccio; Charles C Della Santina
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.435

5.  Angular displacement perception modulated by force background.

Authors:  James R Lackner; Paul DiZio
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-19       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Adaptive modification of vestibularly perceived rotation.

Authors:  J Bloomberg; G Melvill Jones; B Segal
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The oculogyral illusion: retinal and oculomotor factors.

Authors:  Jerome Carriot; A Bryan; P DiZio; J R Lackner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-06       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  New insights into vestibular-saccade interaction based on covert corrective saccades in patients with unilateral vestibular deficits.

Authors:  Paolo Colagiorgio; Maurizio Versino; Silvia Colnaghi; Silvia Quaglieri; Marco Manfrin; Ewa Zamaro; Georgios Mantokoudis; David S Zee; Stefano Ramat
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  Saccade and vestibular ocular motor adaptation.

Authors:  Michael C Schubert; David S Zee
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.406

10.  Mechanism of dynamic visual acuity recovery with vestibular rehabilitation.

Authors:  Michael C Schubert; Americo A Migliaccio; Richard A Clendaniel; Amir Allak; John P Carey
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.966

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.