Literature DB >> 20937715

Adaptation of vestibular signals for self-motion perception.

Rebecca J St George1, Brian L Day, Richard C Fitzpatrick.   

Abstract

A fundamental concern of the brain is to establish the spatial relationship between self and the world to allow purposeful action. Response adaptation to unvarying sensory stimuli is a common feature of neural processing, both peripherally and centrally. For the semicircular canals, peripheral adaptation of the canal-cupula system to constant angular-velocity stimuli dominates the picture and masks central adaptation. Here we ask whether galvanic vestibular stimulation circumvents peripheral adaptation and, if so, does it reveal central adaptive processes. Transmastoidal bipolar galvanic stimulation and platform rotation (20 deg s−1) were applied separately and held constant for 2 min while perceived rotation was measured by verbal report. During real rotation, the perception of turn decayed from the onset of constant velocity with a mean time constant of 15.8 s. During galvanic-evoked virtual rotation, the perception of rotation initially rose but then declined towards zero over a period of ∼100 s. For both stimuli, oppositely directed perceptions of similar amplitude were reported when stimulation ceased indicating signal adaptation at some level. From these data the time constants of three independent processes were estimated: (i) the peripheral canal-cupula adaptation with time constant 7.3 s, (ii) the central ‘velocity-storage' process that extends the afferent signal with time constant 7.7 s, and (iii) a long-term adaptation with time constant 75.9 s. The first two agree with previous data based on constant-velocity stimuli. The third component decayed with the profile of a real constant angular acceleration stimulus, showing that the galvanic stimulus signal bypasses the peripheral transformation so that the brainstem sees the galvanic signal as angular acceleration. An adaptive process involving both peripheral and central processes is indicated. Signals evoked by most natural movements will decay peripherally before adaptation can exert an appreciable effect, making a specific vestibular behavioural role unlikely. This adaptation appears to be a general property of the internal coding of self-motion that receives information from multiple sensory sources and filters out the unvarying components regardless of their origin. In this instance of a pure vestibular sensation, it defines the afferent signal that represents the stationary or zero-rotation state.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20937715      PMCID: PMC3060364          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2010.197053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  57 in total

1.  Velocity storage in labyrinthine disorders.

Authors:  T C Hain; D S Zee
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1992-05-22       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Adaptive plasticity in the gaze stabilizing synergy of slow and saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  J Bloomberg; G Melvill Jones; B Segal
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Adaptive modification of vestibularly perceived rotation.

Authors:  J Bloomberg; G Melvill Jones; B Segal
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Failure of the oculomotor neural integrator from a discrete midline lesion between the abducens nuclei in the monkey.

Authors:  T J Anastasio; D A Robinson
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1991-06-10       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Efferent vestibular system in the toadfish: action upon horizontal semicircular canal afferents.

Authors:  R Boyle; S M Highstein
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Central adaptation models of the vestibulo-ocular and optokinetic systems.

Authors:  J M Furman; T C Hain; G D Paige
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.086

7.  The influence of semicircular canal morphology on endolymph flow dynamics. An anatomically descriptive mathematical model.

Authors:  C M Oman; E N Marcus; I S Curthoys
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1987 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.494

8.  Interaction of vestibular and proprioceptive inputs.

Authors:  T Mergner; F Hlavacka; G Schweigart
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.435

9.  A hypothetical explanation for periodic alternating nystagmus: instability in the optokinetic-vestibular system.

Authors:  R J Leigh; D A Robinson; D S Zee
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  Relation between discharge regularity and responses to externally applied galvanic currents in vestibular nerve afferents of the squirrel monkey.

Authors:  J M Goldberg; C E Smith; C Fernández
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  The sense of self-motion, orientation and balance explored by vestibular stimulation.

Authors:  Rebecca J St George; Richard C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Vestibular contribution to balance control in the medial gastrocnemius and soleus.

Authors:  Christopher J Dakin; Martin E Héroux; Billy L Luu; John Timothy Inglis; Jean-Sébastien Blouin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Gain and phase of perceived virtual rotation evoked by electrical vestibular stimuli.

Authors:  Ryan M Peters; Brandon G Rasman; J Timothy Inglis; Jean-Sébastien Blouin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  A shared neural integrator for human posture control.

Authors:  S E Haggerty; A R Wu; K H Sienko; A D Kuo
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Prolonged asymmetric vestibular stimulation induces opposite, long-term effects on self-motion perception and ocular responses.

Authors:  V E Pettorossi; R Panichi; F M Botti; A Kyriakareli; A Ferraresi; M Faralli; M Schieppati; A M Bronstein
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Development of a conversion model between mechanical and electrical vestibular stimuli.

Authors:  A Chen; N Khosravi-Hashemi; C Kuo; J K Kramer; J-S Blouin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Vestibular stimulation by magnetic fields.

Authors:  Bryan K Ward; Dale C Roberts; Charles C Della Santina; John P Carey; David S Zee
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Passive motion reduces vestibular balance and perceptual responses.

Authors:  Richard C Fitzpatrick; Shaun R D Watson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Immediate repeated testing (IRT) for BPPV: A cost-effective examination.

Authors:  Mariam H Mella; Elena Al Hakim; Jihad Khoury; Fouad Fata
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-04-22

10.  Multiple Time Courses of Vestibular Set-Point Adaptation Revealed by Sustained Magnetic Field Stimulation of the Labyrinth.

Authors:  Prem Jareonsettasin; Jorge Otero-Millan; Bryan K Ward; Dale C Roberts; Michael C Schubert; David S Zee
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 10.834

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.