Literature DB >> 28404827

New insights into vestibular-saccade interaction based on covert corrective saccades in patients with unilateral vestibular deficits.

Paolo Colagiorgio1, Maurizio Versino2,3, Silvia Colnaghi4,5, Silvia Quaglieri6, Marco Manfrin6, Ewa Zamaro7, Georgios Mantokoudis7, David S Zee8, Stefano Ramat9.   

Abstract

In response to passive high-acceleration head impulses, patients with low vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gains often produce covert (executed while the head is still moving) corrective saccades in the direction of deficient slow phases. Here we examined 23 patients using passive, and 9 also active, head impulses with acute (< 10 days from onset) unilateral vestibular neuritis and low VOR gains. We found that when corrective saccades are larger than 10°, the slow-phase component of the VOR is inhibited, even though inhibition increases further the time to reacquire the fixation target. We also found that 1) saccades are faster and more accurate if the residual VOR gain is higher, 2) saccades also compensate for the head displacement that occurs during the saccade, and 3) the amplitude-peak velocity relationship of the larger corrective saccades deviates from that of head-fixed saccades of the same size. We propose a mathematical model to account for these findings hypothesizing that covert saccades are driven by a desired gaze position signal based on a prediction of head displacement using vestibular and extravestibular signals, covert saccades are controlled by a gaze feedback loop, and the VOR command is modulated according to predicted saccade amplitude. A central and novel feature of the model is that the brain develops two separate estimates of head rotation, one for generating saccades while the head is moving and the other for generating slow phases. Furthermore, while the model was developed for gaze-stabilizing behavior during passively induced head impulses, it also simulates both active gaze-stabilizing and active gaze-shifting eye movements.NEW & NOTEWORTHY During active or passive head impulses while fixating stationary targets, low vestibulo-ocular gain subjects produce corrective saccades when the head is still moving. The mechanisms driving these covert saccades are poorly understood. We propose a mathematical model showing that the brain develops two separate estimates of head rotation: a lower level one, presumably in the vestibular nuclei, used to generate the slow-phase component of the response, and a higher level one, within a gaze feedback loop, used to drive corrective saccades.
Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  VOR; covert saccades; gaze feedback loop; mathematical model; vestibular neuritis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28404827      PMCID: PMC5491708          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00864.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  52 in total

1.  Tests of two hypotheses to account for different-sized saccades during disjunctive gaze shifts.

Authors:  S Ramat; V E Das; J T Somers; R J Leigh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  A hypothetical explanation of saccadic oscillations.

Authors:  D S Zee; D A Robinson
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 10.422

3.  Ocular motor responses to abrupt interaural head translation in normal humans.

Authors:  Stefano Ramat; David S Zee
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-04-02       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Vestibuloocular reflex inhibition and gaze saccade control characteristics during eye-head orientation in humans.

Authors:  D Pelisson; C Prablanc; C Urquizar
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Goal-directed vestibulo-ocular function in man: gaze stabilization by slow-phase and saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  B N Segal; A Katsarkas
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Combined eye-head gaze shifts in the primate. II. Interactions between saccades and the vestibuloocular reflex.

Authors:  R D Tomlinson; P S Bahra
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Natural and drug-induced variations of velocity and duration of human saccadic eye movements: evidence for a control of the neural pulse generator by local feedback.

Authors:  R Jürgens; W Becker; H H Kornhuber
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.086

8.  Slow saccades in spinocerebellar degeneration.

Authors:  D S Zee; L M Optican; J D Cook; D A Robinson; W K Engel
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1976-04

9.  Comparison of head thrust test with head autorotation test reveals that the vestibulo-ocular reflex is enhanced during voluntary head movements.

Authors:  Charles C Della Santina; Phillip D Cremer; John P Carey; Lloyd B Minor
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2002-09

10.  A New Tool for Investigating the Functional Testing of the VOR.

Authors:  Paolo Colagiorgio; Silvia Colnaghi; Maurizio Versino; Stefano Ramat
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 4.003

View more
  7 in total

1.  Compensatory saccades differ between those with vestibular hypofunction and multiple sclerosis pointing to unique roles for peripheral and central vestibular inputs.

Authors:  Andrew R Wagner; Colin R Grove; Brian J Loyd; Leland E Dibble; Michael C Schubert
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 2.974

2.  The Role of Neck Input in Producing Corrective Saccades in the Head Impulse Test.

Authors:  Shinichi Iwasaki; Teru Kamogashira; Chisato Fujimoto; Kayoko Kabaya; Makoto Kinoshita; Tatsuya Yamasoba
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 4.086

3.  Functional Head Impulse Testing Might Be Useful for Assessing Vestibular Compensation After Unilateral Vestibular Loss.

Authors:  Julia Sjögren; Per-Anders Fransson; Mikael Karlberg; Måns Magnusson; Fredrik Tjernström
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 4.003

4.  A Novel Saccadic Strategy Revealed by Suppression Head Impulse Testing of Patients with Bilateral Vestibular Loss.

Authors:  Catherine de Waele; Qiwen Shen; Christophe Magnani; Ian S Curthoys
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 4.003

5.  Cognitive Rehabilitation in Bilateral Vestibular Patients: A Computational Perspective.

Authors:  Andrew W Ellis; Corina G Schöne; Dominique Vibert; Marco D Caversaccio; Fred W Mast
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 4.003

6.  Validation of the Italian Version of the Dizziness Handicap Inventory, the Situational Vertigo Questionnaire, and the Activity-Specific Balance Confidence Scale for Peripheral and Central Vestibular Symptoms.

Authors:  Silvia Colnaghi; Cristiana Rezzani; Marco Gnesi; Marco Manfrin; Silvia Quaglieri; Daniele Nuti; Marco Mandalà; Maria Cristina Monti; Maurizio Versino
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 4.003

7.  Head impulse compensatory saccades: Visual dependence is most evident in bilateral vestibular loss.

Authors:  Jacob M Pogson; Rachael L Taylor; Leigh A McGarvie; Andrew P Bradshaw; Mario D'Souza; Sean Flanagan; Jonathan Kong; G Michael Halmagyi; Miriam S Welgampola
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.