Literature DB >> 24808109

Incidental computer tomography radiologic findings through research participation in the North Texas Healthy Heart Study.

Anna Espinoza1, Kendra Malone, Elizabeth Balyakina, Kimberly G Fulda, Roberto Cardarelli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although variation exists in the classification and practice of managing clinical findings in research, emerging views suggest that researchers bear some responsibility in the management of incidental findings. This study contributes to the documentation of the population characteristics and prevalence of medical findings incidental to research participation, specifically findings related to coronary calcium scores and computed tomography (CT) scans that investigated cardiovascular disparities in an asymptomatic population.
METHODS: A total of 571 asymptomatic adult participants were recruited in the North Texas Healthy Heart Study. Participants completed a 16-slice CT scan of the heart and abdomen. Findings of radiology reports and 3 years of follow-up documentation were reviewed.
RESULTS: A total of 246 clinically apparent findings were identified in 169 asymptomatic participants (32.9% of participants who completed a CT scan). Another 245 participants (48%) had findings of unknown significance, a total of 307 findings. At least 4 cases in this study led to a clinically significant intervention.
CONCLUSION: Although CT scans were completed for research purposes, study procedures resulted in the diagnosis and treatment of individuals who were previously asymptomatic. Potential clinical benefits in imaging research are moderated by considerations regarding possible harm and costs resulting from uncertain findings and the use of CT scans for nonclinical purposes. The continued development of protocols for the handling of incidental findings in research and the establishment of guidelines are needed to ensure that research procedures mirror the best interests of participants.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed Tomography; Incidental Findings; Medical Ethics; Practice-based Research Networks; Research Subjects

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24808109      PMCID: PMC4113722          DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2014.03.130250

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med        ISSN: 1557-2625            Impact factor:   2.657


  27 in total

1.  The prevalence and implications of incidental findings on ED abdominal CT scans.

Authors:  W A Messersmith; D F Brown; M J Barry
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.469

2.  Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report.

Authors: 
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-12-17       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Estimated radiation risks potentially associated with full-body CT screening.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Carl D Elliston
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-07-23       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Coronary artery calcification and coronary atherosclerotic disease.

Authors:  Ramil Goel; Pankaj Garg; Stephan Achenbach; Abha Gupta; Jeremy J Song; Nathan D Wong; Leslee J Shaw; Jagat Narula
Journal:  Cardiol Clin       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 2.213

5.  Incidental findings from lung CT scans: implications for research.

Authors:  Sarah Aldington; Philippa Shirtcliffe; Mike Nowitz; Andrew Kingzett-Taylor; Mike Tweed; Mark Weatherall; Joan B Soriano; Richard Beasley
Journal:  J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.735

6.  Incidental extracardiac findings at coronary CT: clinical and economic impact.

Authors:  Christoph I Lee; Emily B Tsai; Bronislava M Sigal; Sylvia K Plevritis; Alan M Garber; Geoffrey D Rubin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 7.  Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf; Frances P Lawrenz; Charles A Nelson; Jeffrey P Kahn; Mildred K Cho; Ellen Wright Clayton; Joel G Fletcher; Michael K Georgieff; Dale Hammerschmidt; Kathy Hudson; Judy Illes; Vivek Kapur; Moira A Keane; Barbara A Koenig; Bonnie S Leroy; Elizabeth G McFarland; Jordan Paradise; Lisa S Parker; Sharon F Terry; Brian Van Ness; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.718

Review 8.  Prevalence of incidental findings in computed tomographic screening of the chest: a systematic review.

Authors:  Peter C A Jacobs; Willem P Th M Mali; Diederick E Grobbee; Yolanda van der Graaf
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  The Role of Law in the Debate over Return of Research Results and Incidental Findings: The Challenge of Developing Law for Translational Science.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf
Journal:  Minn J Law Sci Technol       Date:  2012

10.  Computed tomography screening and lung cancer outcomes.

Authors:  Peter B Bach; James R Jett; Ugo Pastorino; Melvyn S Tockman; Stephen J Swensen; Colin B Begg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  [Use of Coronary CT Angiography as a Screening Tool for Coronary Artery Disease in Asymptomatic Healthy Individuals or Patients].

Authors:  Gong Yong Jin
Journal:  Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi       Date:  2022-01-21
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.