Literature DB >> 18543711

Analysis of a trial-spacing effect with relatively long intertrial intervals.

Ceyhun Sunsay1, Mark E Bouton.   

Abstract

In three experiments with rat subjects, we examined the effects of trial spacing in appetitive conditioning. Previous research in this preparation suggests that self-generated priming of the conditional stimulus (CS) and/or unconditional stimulus (US) in short-term memory is a cause of the trial-spacing effect that occurs with intertrial intervals (ITIs) of less than 240 sec. Experiment 1 nonetheless showed that a trial-spacing effect still occurs when ITIs are increased beyond 240 sec, and that the effect of ITI over 60-1,920 sec on conditioned responding is best described as a linear function. In Experiment 2, some subjects were removed from the context during the ITIs, preventing extinction of the context. Removal abolished the advantage of the long ITI, suggesting the importance of exposure to the context during the long ITI. Experiment 3 still produced a trial-spacing effect in a within-subjects design that controlled for the level of context conditioning and reinforcement rate in the absence of the CS. Overall, the results are most consistent with the idea that adding time to the ITI above 240 sec facilitates conditioning by extinguishing context-CS associations--and possibly context-US associations--that otherwise interfere with CS-US learning through retrieval-generated priming (see, e.g., Wagner, 1981).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18543711     DOI: 10.3758/lb.36.2.104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  13 in total

Review 1.  Time, rate, and conditioning.

Authors:  C R Gallistel; J Gibbon
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Theoretical mechanisms underlying the trial-spacing effect in Pavlovian fear conditioning.

Authors:  P B Barela
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1999-04

3.  Importance of trials versus accumulating time across trials in partially reinforced appetitive conditioning.

Authors:  Mark E Bouton; Ceyhun Sunsay
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2003-01

4.  Memory priming and trial spacing effects in Pavlovian learning.

Authors:  Ceyhun Sunsay; Lee Stetson; Mark E Bouton
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Eyelid conditioning as a function of the inter-trial interval.

Authors:  K W SPENCE; E B NORRIS
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1950-12

6.  Component-levels theory of the effects of spacing of repetitions on recall and recognition.

Authors:  A M Glenberg
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1979-03

7.  Trial spacing and trial distribution effects in Pavlovian conditioning: contributions of a comparator mechanism.

Authors:  H Yin; R C Barnet; R R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1994-04

8.  Local time horizons in Pavlovian learning.

Authors:  R C Barnet; N J Grahame; R R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1993-07

9.  A model for Pavlovian learning: variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli.

Authors:  J M Pearce; G Hall
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Effects of the intertrial interval on taste-aversion learning in rats.

Authors:  M Domjan
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1980-07
View more
  15 in total

1.  Distinct kinetics of synaptic structural plasticity, memory formation, and memory decay in massed and spaced learning.

Authors:  Wajeeha Aziz; Wen Wang; Sebnem Kesaf; Alsayed Abdelhamid Mohamed; Yugo Fukazawa; Ryuichi Shigemoto
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The goldfish conditioned withdrawal preparation: effects of some basic methodological variables.

Authors:  Peter B Barela
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Verbal and spatial acquisition as a function of distributed practice and code-specific interference.

Authors:  Adam P Young; Alice F Healy; Matt Jones; Lyle E Bourne
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-05

4.  Special issue on computational models of classical conditioning guest editors' introduction.

Authors:  Eduardo Alonso; Nestor Schmajuk
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Implications of learning theory for developing programs to decrease overeating.

Authors:  Kerri N Boutelle; Mark E Bouton
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 3.868

6.  Design and implementation of a study evaluating extinction processes to food cues in obese children: the Intervention for Regulations of Cues Trial (iROC).

Authors:  Kerri N Boutelle; June Liang; Stephanie Knatz; Brittany Matheson; Victoria Risbrough; David Strong; Kyung E Rhee; Michelle G Craske; Nancy Zucker; Mark E Bouton
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2014-11-22       Impact factor: 2.226

7.  Separation of time-based and trial-based accounts of the partial reinforcement extinction effect.

Authors:  Mark E Bouton; Amanda M Woods; Travis P Todd
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2013-08-17       Impact factor: 1.777

8.  Temporal maps and informativeness in associative learning.

Authors:  Peter D Balsam; C Randy Gallistel
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2009-01-10       Impact factor: 13.837

9.  Effects of conditioned stimulus (CS) duration, intertrial interval, and I/T ratio on appetitive Pavlovian conditioning.

Authors:  Eric A Thrailkill; Travis P Todd; Mark E Bouton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 2.478

Review 10.  The proboscis extension reflex to evaluate learning and memory in honeybees (Apis mellifera): some caveats.

Authors:  Elisabeth H Frost; Dave Shutler; Neil Kirk Hillier
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2012-08-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.