Literature DB >> 18539624

What next for preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)? Experience with blastocyst biopsy and testing for aneuploidy.

Robert P S Jansen1, Mark C Bowman, Kylie A de Boer, Don A Leigh, Devora B Lieberman, Steven J McArthur.   

Abstract

Blastocysts more commonly have a normal karyotype than cleavage-stage embryos do. Moreover, blastocysts have also made a metabolic transition from catabolism and recycling of the oocyte's reserves and resources, processes that fuel the first 3 days of cleavage. Although not all blastocysts are karyotypically equal, it is still to be determined to what extent a mosaic karyotype might be a normal feature among embryos, both at the cleavage stage and the blastocyst stage--and when looking for karyotypic abnormalities by embryo biopsy might help the chance of implantation rather than harm it. It is also still impractical to look at all the chromosomes that can, through their aneuploidy, stand in the way of successful embryonic and fetal development. We report a randomized clinical trial of blastocyst biopsy followed by preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) for aneuploidy using 5-colour FISH. The trial was suspended and then terminated early when we were unable to show an advantage for PGS. If we are correct in assuming that mitotic non-disjunction is common by the stage of the blastocyst (and that it is much less ominous than meiotic non-disjunction), then further studies of effective PGS of blastocysts for aneuploidy require methods of analysis that cover all the chromosomes and can differentiate the triallelic and monoallelic states of meiotically derived aneuploidies from the biallelic state of mitotic aneuploidies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18539624     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/den129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  20 in total

1.  Twenty-four chromosome FISH in human IVF embryos reveals patterns of post-zygotic chromosome segregation and nuclear organisation.

Authors:  D Ioannou; K G L Fonseka; E J Meershoek; A R Thornhill; A Abogrein; M Ellis; D K Griffin
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Slow and ultrarapid cryopreservation of biopsied mouse blastocysts and its effect on DNA integrity index.

Authors:  Amr Kader; Tommaso Falcone; Rakesh K Sharma; Devna Mangrola; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-05-30       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  IVF/ICSI with or without preimplantation genetic screening for aneuploidy in couples without genetic disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Miguel A Checa; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Ivan Solà; Ana Robles; Ramón Carreras; Juan Balasch
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  PGS-FISH in reproductive medicine and perspective directions for improvement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sandra Zamora; Ana Clavero; M Carmen Gonzalvo; Juan de Dios Luna Del Castillo; Jose Antonio Roldán-Nofuentes; Juan Mozas; Jose Antonio Castilla
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  Preimplantation genetic screening: does it help or hinder IVF treatment and what is the role of the embryo?

Authors:  Kim Dao Ly; Ashok Agarwal; Zsolt Peter Nagy
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Pregnancy and child developmental outcomes after preimplantation genetic screening: a meta-analytic and systematic review.

Authors:  Misaki N Natsuaki; Laura M Dimler
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 2.764

7.  Association between amino acid turnover and chromosome aneuploidy during human preimplantation embryo development in vitro.

Authors:  Helen M Picton; Kay Elder; Franchesca D Houghton; Judith A Hawkhead; Anthony J Rutherford; Jan E Hogg; Henry J Leese; Sarah E Harris
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 4.025

Review 8.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: state of the art 2011.

Authors:  Joyce C Harper; Sioban B Sengupta
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  Quantitative decision-making in preimplantation genetic (aneuploidy) screening (PGS).

Authors:  Michael C Summers; Andrew D Foland
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  What next for preimplantation genetic screening? A polar body approach!

Authors:  Joep Geraedts; John Collins; Luca Gianaroli; Veerle Goossens; Alan Handyside; Joyce Harper; Markus Montag; Sjoerd Repping; Andreas Schmutzler
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 6.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.