Literature DB >> 19847639

Quantitative decision-making in preimplantation genetic (aneuploidy) screening (PGS).

Michael C Summers1, Andrew D Foland.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze using hypergeometric probability statistics the impact of performing preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) on a cohort of day 3 cleavage stage embryos.
METHODS: Statistical mathematical modeling.
RESULTS: We find the benefit of performing PGS is highly dependent on the number of day 3 embryos available for biopsy. Additional hidden variables that determine the outcome of PGS are the rates of aneuploidy and mosaicism, and the probability of a chromosomally mosaic embryo to test "normal". If PGS is performed, our analysis shows that many combinations of the number of biopsiable embryos, and the rates of aneuploidy and mosaicism results in a marginal benefit from the intervention. Other combinations are detrimental if PGS is actually undertaken. Finally, increases in PGS error rates lead to a rapid loss in the ability of PGS to provide useful discriminatory information.
CONCLUSION: We set out the statistical framework to determine the limits of PGS when a specific number of day 3 preimplantation embryos are available for biopsy. In general, PGS cannot be recommended a priori for a specific clinical situation due to the statistical uncertainties associated with the different hidden variable quantitative parameters considered important to the clinical outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19847639      PMCID: PMC2788688          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-009-9352-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  56 in total

1.  Chromosome analysis of blastomeres from human embryos by using comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  L Voullaire; H Slater; R Williamson; L Wilton
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Chromosome mosaicism in day 3 aneuploid embryos that develop to morphologically normal blastocysts in vitro.

Authors:  M C Magli; G M Jones; L Gras; L Gianaroli; I Korman; A O Trounson
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Cleavage anomalies in early human embryos and survival after prolonged culture in-vitro.

Authors:  M Alikani; G Calderon; G Tomkin; J Garrisi; M Kokot; J Cohen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 4.  Technology requirements for preimplantation genetic diagnosis to improve assisted reproduction outcomes.

Authors:  Santiago Munné; Dagan Wells; Jacques Cohen
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Chromosomal mosaicism throughout human preimplantation development in vitro: incidence, type, and relevance to embryo outcome.

Authors:  Magdalena Bielanska; Seang Lin Tan; Asangla Ao
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of numerical abnormalities for 13 chromosomes.

Authors:  Iman Abdelhadi; Pere Colls; Mireia Sandalinas; Tomas Escudero; Santiago Munné
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.828

7.  Developmental ability of chromosomally abnormal human embryos to develop to the blastocyst stage.

Authors:  M Sandalinas; S Sadowy; M Alikani; G Calderon; J Cohen; S Munné
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Chromosomal abnormalities in embryos.

Authors:  M C Magli; L Gianaroli; A P Ferraretti
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2001-10-22       Impact factor: 4.102

9.  Preimplantation diagnosis for aneuploidies in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization with a poor prognosis: identification of the categories for which it should be proposed.

Authors:  L Gianaroli; M C Magli; A P Ferraretti; S Munné
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Comprehensive chromosomal analysis of human preimplantation embryos using whole genome amplification and single cell comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  D Wells; J D Delhanty
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.025

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  PGS-FISH in reproductive medicine and perspective directions for improvement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sandra Zamora; Ana Clavero; M Carmen Gonzalvo; Juan de Dios Luna Del Castillo; Jose Antonio Roldán-Nofuentes; Juan Mozas; Jose Antonio Castilla
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 3.412

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.